mcpField
F
forgejudge

forgejudge

Local
forgejudge.ahmedhobeishy.techDeveloper Tools0Updated 5w ago

About forgejudge

ForgeJudge is an archived, open-source evaluation harness for autonomous coding agents, with a frozen leaderboard and rerunnable tests. It combines sandboxed patch grading, run traces and a multi-seed CI regression gate; scheduled runs and maintenance have ended.

Key features

  1. 01Sandboxed patch grading
  2. 02Deterministic harness self-test
  3. 03Multi-seed CI regression gate
  4. 04Per-run trace records
  5. 05Frozen evaluation leaderboard

Use cases

  1. 01Regrade saved patches
  2. 02Test changes to the evaluation harness
  3. 03Rerun an archived model comparison

MCP support

An optional MCP server is available through the `forgejudge mcp` CLI command and exposes ForgeJudge capabilities to MCP clients.

Configuration

Local server config is the same for every client. Copy it into your client’s MCP config file.

mcp.json · Universal config
{
"mcpServers": {
"ahmedeid1-forgejudge": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"forgejudge"
]
}
}
}
Run commanduvx forgejudge

Local servers need a runtime on your machine (e.g. Node.js 18+). Config file locations differ by client; see your client’s docs.

Packages
pypiforgejudge0.1.0

Tools

3

Saved tool list · updated 3w ago

This tool takes no parameters.

Details

From the project README

ForgeJudge

An open leaderboard and CI gate for autonomous coding agents — every patch runs in a sandbox, every run is traced, every regression fails the build.

📦 Archived (2026-09-28). ForgeJudge is no longer maintained and nothing runs on a schedule any more. The leaderboard is frozen at the last complete sweep (2026-07-02, 162 runs). Two of its three models have since been retired by Groq. Archive notes & how to rerun it in a fork →

CI regression gate license: MIT python 3.12

▶ Archived leaderboard (frozen 2026-07-02): forgejudge.ahmedhobeishy.tech · playground · methodology · model swap · MCP registry

Final results — the last complete sweep, 2026-07-02 (run #34; hidden-test = the agent never sees the failing test; $0 free tier; same harness, swap the model; 18 tasks × 3 seeds = 54 runs/model, 162 total):

Modelpass@1pass@3Status today
llama-3.3-70b-versatile98.1%100%retired by Groq 2026-08-16
gpt-oss-120b94.4%94.4%available
llama-3.1-8b-instant57.4%72.2%retired by Groq 2026-08-16

With the harness fixed, the 8B model trails the 70B/120B models by ~40 points (the model-swap signal), and pass@3 ≥ pass@1 reflects run-to-run variance — which is exactly why the CI gate is multi-seed. Every run's patch is in runs.json and re-grades to the same verdict; the Langfuse trace links pointed at the original project and are not expected to resolve any more. Details, later unpublished sweeps and the retired models: docs/ARCHIVE.md.

ForgeJudge is an open-source autonomous software-engineering agent that proved its quality in public on every commit while it was active: a hand-rolled single-agent solver, a deterministic execution-as-judge harness, a leaderboard with per-run traces (now a frozen snapshot), and a CI gate that blocks regressions — all on a $0 / self-hostable stack against a contamination-resistant, intrinsically-verifiable golden set.

The engineered harness, observability, and gate are the deliverable — not a high resolution rate. A $0 free-model agent will score modestly by design. We prove value with a model-swap comparison: the score rises with a better model while the harness stays fixed.

How it works

flowchart TD
    G["Golden set · Git-canonical<br/>18 intrinsically-verifiable, mutation-hardened<br/>make-CI-green tasks"]

    subgraph SOLVER["Single-agent solver"]
        direction LR
        L["localize<br/>(BM25)"] --> R["repair<br/>(LLM router · critic · syntax edit-gate)"] --> V["validate<br/>(run tests)"]
    end

    G --> SOLVER
    SOLVER --> PATCH["unified diff"]
    SOLVER -. "every step traced" .-> TRACE["OTel → Langfuse<br/>per-run trace"]

    PATCH --> H["Deterministic harness, in a sandbox<br/>apply test_patch + candidate patch · run F2P / P2P<br/><b>RESOLVED iff</b> every FAIL_TO_PASS passes AND every PASS_TO_PASS stays green<br/>swebench-equivalent · stricter on skips · cheat-resistant"]

    H --> STORE["Run store<br/>Neon + pgvector"]
    STORE --> LB["Leaderboard<br/>pass@1 / pass@3 · cost · tokens · trace link"]
    H --> GATE["Multi-seed CI gate<br/>a PR that lowers the resolution rate fails the build"]

    style G stroke:#3fb950,stroke-width:2px
    style H stroke:#4cc2ff,stroke-width:2px
    style GATE stroke:#f0883e,stroke-width:2px
  • Solver — a single, phase-structured loop (localize → repair → validate), not a multi-agent swarm: cheapest, most deterministic, most debuggable. BM25 localization, an LLM router over free tiers, a syntax edit-gate, a cheap critic pre-filter, and a cost/step budget with autosubmit.
  • Harness — encodes the SWE-bench RESOLVED_FULL rule and is verified equivalent to swebench.harness.grading on real PASS/FAIL/ERROR/XFAIL outcomes in CI — and deliberately stricter on a skipped FAIL_TO_PASS: swebench 4.1.0 rates a skipped oracle test RESOLVED_FULL (a skip is neither success nor failure), so a patch that makes the oracle skip rather than run grades as resolved. ForgeJudge counts a skip as not-passed, closing that cheat vector. Patches are also cheat-resistant: the canonical test files are restored before grading, so a patch can't neuter the oracle.
  • Golden set — 15 purpose-built post-cutoff fixtures + 3 tasks mined from the author's own repos (real commit SHAs, MIT/own license — zero leak/copyleft risk). Each is mutation-hardened: a wrong fix to the patched region is caught (16 mutation-hardened at mean score 0.94; 2 inconclusive for regex/string code; 0 weak).
  • Sandbox / CI / sweep — GitHub Actions on a public repo does triple duty (ephemeral isolated VM sandbox + regression gate + leaderboard sweep) at $0. The sweep ran nightly until the archive; it is manual (workflow_dispatch) now.
  • Observability — OpenTelemetry GenAI spans (invoke_agent → retrieval / chat / execute_tool, gen_ai.usage.*, a gen_ai.evaluation.result pass/fail verdict) exported to Langfuse Cloud; every run recorded a trace link (in the original Langfuse project; since the archive the links are not expected to resolve).
Two gates, two jobs

The deterministic gold-integrity gate (does the harness itself still work?) is kept separate from the stochastic regression gate (did a change make the agent meaningfully worse?) — because gold grading is deterministic and must never be averaged with noisy per-seed runs.

flowchart TD
    PR["Pull request / commit"] --> GG["Gold-integrity gate<br/>deterministic · $0 · re-grade all gold patches"]
    GG -->|"any gold task unresolved"| F1["fail — the harness broke"]
    GG -->|"all gold tasks resolved"| OK1["harness intact"]

    CRON["On-demand multi-seed sweep"] --> SEEDS["run the agent × N seeds<br/>→ one resolution rate per seed"]
    SEEDS --> RG["Regression gate<br/>small-sample CI (Student-t / Wilson)"]
    BASE["baseline_scores.json<br/>per-seed reference"] --> RG
    RG -->|"candidate CI upper bound &lt; baseline CI lower bound"| F2["❌ fail — real regression"]
    RG -->|"overlapping · equal · improved"| OK2["✓ no regression"]

    style GG stroke:#4cc2ff,stroke-width:2px
    style RG stroke:#f0883e,stroke-width:2px

Quickstart

Prereq: uv (Python 3.12 is provisioned for you) — curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh.

git clone https://github.com/ahmedEid1/forgejudge && cd forgejudge
uv sync                       # Python 3.12, deps via uv

# Run the deterministic harness self-test (no API key, no network):
uv run python -m forgejudge.harness.runner_actions --patch-source gold   # 18/18 resolved

# Solve a task with a free model and grade it.
# Needs a (free) Groq key. Either export it, or put it in .env and pass --env-file:
#   export GROQ_API_KEY=...                     # or
#   cp .env.example .env && edit GROQ_API_KEY   # then: uv run --env-file .env python - <<'PY'
uv run python - <<'PY'
from forgejudge.golden.loader import load_tasks
from forgejudge.agent.solver import solve
from forgejudge.harness.grade import grade
task = {t.instance_id: t for t in load_tasks("golden/dataset.jsonl")}["fixture-semver-001"]
res = solve(task, run_id="demo", budget_usd=0.10, seed=0)
print(res.status, "→ resolved:", grade(task, res.patch).resolved)
PY

Fast tests: uv run pytest -m "not slow". Full golden validation + mutation hardening: uv run pytest -m slow. Sweep one model without a database: uv run --env-file .env python -m forgejudge.eval.sweep --model groq/openai/gpt-oss-120b --seeds 0,1,2 --no-store --out runs-0.jsonl. The full rerun guide (secrets, database, deploy) is in docs/ARCHIVE.md. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full pytest marker map and dev workflow.

Install

Working on the agent/harness itself? Clone and uv sync (above). To consume ForgeJudge as a package:

The published forgejudge==0.1.0 predates the archive: its models.yaml still lists the retired llama-3.3-70b-versatile in several role chains. solve() still works through its gpt-oss-120b primary, but for the current chains install from git (pip install git+https://github.com/ahmedEid1/forgejudge).

# Library + the `forgejudge` CLI (selftest / mcp / info):
pip install forgejudge
forgejudge selftest           # deterministic harness check — 18/18 resolved, no key
forgejudge mcp                # MCP server over stdio (needs the [mcp] extra)

# Zero-install MCP server (no venv to manage) — for an MCP client config:
uvx --from "forgejudge[mcp]" forgejudge mcp

Optional extras (installed only when you need them):

ExtraPulls inFor
forgejudge[harness]swebenchthe swebench-equivalence grading check
forgejudge[mcp]fastmcpthe MCP server (forgejudge mcp)
forgejudge[playground]fastapi, uvicorn, httpxthe guarded live playground API (self-host; the hosted instance is no longer maintained)
pip install "forgejudge[mcp]"            # one extra
pip install "forgejudge[harness,mcp]"    # several

forgejudge selftest and forgejudge info work with the base install — no extras, no API key, no network.

Six objections, pre-empted

  1. "Your benchmark is contaminated / cherry-picked." The golden set is freshly authored / post-cutoff, sourced only from the author's own repos + fixtures (no third-party leak surface), and mutation-hardened so a wrong patch can't pass. SWE-bench Verified is now widely held contaminated — OpenAI stopped reporting it (2026-02); >32% of "passed" cases leaked the solution and ~31% passed on weak tests. Decontamination here is a documented, tested property — not a footnote.
  2. "Thin wrapper around an LLM / a framework." The orchestrator is hand-rolled (no LangChain): the control loop, the sandbox-and-score harness, the cheat-resistant grader, the mutation hardener, the OTel instrumentation, and the multi-seed CI gate are the work.
  3. "Your resolution rate is low vs SOTA." SOTA is ~88–94% with premium models and budgets; a $0 free-model number is modest on purpose. The deliverable is the engineered system; the model-swap comparison (score rises with a better model, harness fixed) is the proof.
  4. "Is it actually autonomous or staged?" Every run recorded an OpenTelemetry/Langfuse trace, and every stored patch re-grades deterministically to its recorded verdict. The replay-first playground demos a real solve without exposing cost/abuse surface.
  5. "Three agent projects — one-trick pony?" One eval methodology — golden set + judge + traces + CI gate — across three domains at rising autonomy (Lumen → Thoth → ForgeJudge).
  6. Determinism. temperature=0 does not guarantee determinism (pass@1 varies 2–6pp). The scorer is fully deterministic; the gate is multi-seed (fail only when the candidate's CI upper bound is below the baseline's CI lower bound), so flaky single runs don't break the build.

Repository layout

PathWhat
forgejudge/golden/golden-set loader, fixture contract, dataset builder, mutation hardener
forgejudge/harness/deterministic grade(), cheat-resistant runner, swebench-equivalence check, sandbox executor
forgejudge/agent/localize → repair → validate solve loop, critic
forgejudge/llm/role-based LiteLLM router with fallback + cost accounting
forgejudge/obs/OpenTelemetry GenAI tracing → Langfuse / Phoenix
forgejudge/eval/leaderboard sweep, quality-gated publish, multi-seed regression gate, LLM-as-judge + Cohen's κ
forgejudge/store/Neon (Postgres + pgvector) run store + leaderboard query
golden/dataset.jsonlcanonical golden set (one Task per line)
.github/workflows/ci, gate (gold integrity), eval (sandbox), regression-gate, release (on a v* tag push or on demand), and the manual-only sweep, pages-deploy, publish-mcp
docs/DESIGN.md (technical deep-dive), ARCHIVE.md (final results + rerun guide)

License

MIT © 2026 Ahmed Hobeishy. Imports and attributes the MIT-licensed swebench grading harness.

Comments

Markdown supported

New to MCP?

From what the protocol is to installing your first server, these answers cover most first questions.

An open protocol that defines how AI applications connect to external tools and data in a uniform way. Clients talk to the model; MCP servers provide tools, resources and prompt templates. They exchange standard messages, so one server can be reused by many clients.