About veritasgraph
VeritasGraph is a GraphRAG MCP server and agent framework combining tree navigation with knowledge-graph reasoning. It targets document Q&A workflows that need traceable evidence and governed execution, runs locally or in the cloud, and can abstain when evidence is missing.
Key features
- 01Tree-structured and knowledge-graph retrieval
- 02Multi-hop Q&A with source citations
- 03Explicit abstention when evidence is missing
- 04Local or cloud operating modes
- 05Governed agent orchestration and traces
- 06Studio graph and agent workspace
Use cases
- 01Build citation-grounded Q&A over documents
- 02Query graph relationships across multiple hops
- 03Run governed agent workflows locally
- 04Inspect orchestration stages and tool calls
MCP support
VeritasGraph provides an MCP server entry point, launchable with `python -m veritasgraph_mcp`. Studio also includes local MCP proxy connectors.
Configuration
Local server config is the same for every client. Copy it into your client’s MCP config file.
uvx veritasgraph-mcpVERITASGRAPH_MODELDefault local Ollama model for ingest/query (e.g. qwen3:latest).OLLAMA_HOSTLocal Ollama endpoint.STUDIO_DATA_DIRDirectory where the knowledge-graph snapshot is persisted.Local servers need a runtime on your machine (e.g. Node.js 18+). Config file locations differ by client; see your client’s docs.
Tools
5Saved tool list · updated 2w ago
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | Yes | Full document text to ingest. |
| model | string | No | Local Ollama model to use (defaults to $VERITASGRAPH_MODEL). |
| title | string | No | Human-readable document title. |
Details
From the project READMEVeritasGraph — The Governed, On-Prem GraphRAG & Agent Framework
Stop chunking blindly. Combine Tree-Search structure with Knowledge-Graph reasoning — and wire it into governed AI agents. Runs 100% locally or in the cloud.
🎯 Traditional RAG guesses based on similarity. VeritasGraph reasons based on structure. Don't just find the document — understand the connection, then act on it with governed agents.
🌐 Live site · ⭐ Star · 🍴 Fork · 💬 Discuss · 🐛 Report a bug
python -m veritasgraph_mcp # from repo root (needs local Ollama for ingest/query)
Why Vector RAG Breaks on Deep Research
- Attribution is a data model, not a prompt: Storing provenance at write time prevents hallucinated citations at read time.
- Deterministic retrieval: Graph traversal is fully reproducible, separating factual evidence traces from stochastic LLM generation.
- Explicit abstention: The agent identifies missing graph edges and returns "insufficient evidence" rather than guessing.
📚 Featured Guide — Build Governed AI Agents On-Prem
A complete walkthrough of designing, wiring, and shipping governed AI agents entirely on your own infrastructure.
📄 Read the guide: Build Governed AI Agents On-Prem (PDF)
🚀 Quick Start (2 lines, no GPU)
pip install veritasgraph
veritasgraph demo --mode=lite
That's it — an interactive demo using cloud APIs (OpenAI/Anthropic), no local models required.
| Mode | Best For | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
--mode=lite | Quick demo, no GPU | OpenAI/Anthropic API key |
--mode=local | Privacy, offline use | Ollama + 8GB RAM |
--mode=full | Production, all features | Docker + Neo4j |
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..." # Lite: cloud APIs, zero setup
veritasgraph demo --mode=lite
veritasgraph demo --mode=local --model=llama3.2 # 100% offline with Ollama
veritasgraph start --mode=full # full GraphRAG pipeline
Useful links: ⚡ Live docs · 🎮 Live demo · 📖 Article · 📄 Research paper
🏥 Example Implementation — MedTrust Agent
MedTrust Agent is a complete, reproducible example implementation of the VeritasGraph governed-agent architecture, applied to medical and pharmaceutical workflows — a zero-trust, observable LLM agent framework (NEECON 2026 paper).
- Zero-trust control plane: least-privilege IAM with step-up authorization — no tool runs before authorization succeeds.
- Governed answers: mandatory
[doc#chunk]citations; uncited answers are withheld or routed to human review. - Tamper-evident audit: keyed, hash-chained audit log with published anchors.
- Honest evaluation: security measured directly from the running code (100% unauthorized actions blocked, Wilson 95% CIs), answer quality clearly labelled illustrative; 69 tests, a versioned 40-scenario suite, and a one-command reproduce script.
python -m medtrust.demo # end-to-end governed demo, 100% offline
📄 Read the full write-up: MedTrust Agent README
🧩 Built with VeritasGraph
A growing ecosystem of projects is building on VeritasGraph for enterprise GraphRAG, agent orchestration, fact-checking, and governed reasoning.
Community projects and integrations
- MeAkash77 / VeritasGraph-Enterprise-GraphRAG-Verifiable-AI-Platform — enterprise GraphRAG adapter and verifiable AI platform patterns.
- PTP063 / veritas-graph — derivative project and live deployment using VeritasGraph concepts.
- RahulSagar2005 / multi-hop-rag — multi-hop retrieval and reasoning workflows.
- lukehungngo / agentwall — agent security and governance-oriented reasoning flows.
- gajanan229 / Fact-checker-Agent — evidence-focused fact-checking and explanation patterns.
- Minh-Tam-Solution / EndiorBot — enterprise chatbot and AI agent integration built around graph-backed reasoning.
- NistorDorinGabriel / Proiect_Licenta — academic thesis project extending VeritasGraph-inspired graph reasoning techniques.
If you are building with VeritasGraph and want to be featured here, open a PR or reach out with a short repo description and usage summary.
� Live Example — Floorplan-KG Takeoff Demo
A hosted, zero-setup example of VeritasGraph applied to construction drawings. Upload a floorplan PDF (or pick a bundled sample) and the engine extracts rooms, dimensions, openings, fixtures, and schedules — then builds a knowledge graph and quantity takeoff you can query, all with verifiable provenance back to the source sheet.
🏗️ Try the Floorplan-KG demo — free, no login; runs the live PyMuPDF/pdfplumber extraction pipeline.
- What it shows: PDF → structured rooms/dimensions/schedules → knowledge graph → CSV/XLSX takeoff export, with a VeritasGraph assist panel for grounded Q&A over the extracted graph.
- Why it matters: the same governed-attribution model that powers document RAG applies to geometry — every measured quantity traces back to a specific sheet and element rather than a guessed value.
- Example output: a single-sheet residential plan returns ~17 rooms and ~2,400 sq ft in under 200 ms.
Studio is a local Agent Build Workspace (FastAPI + single-page UI) that lets you build a knowledge graph from your own documents and wire it into agents alongside tools, memory, data logging, guardrails, and headroom-style context budgeting — then chat with those agents live and watch every stage of the orchestration pipeline. Everything runs 100% locally against Ollama.
🎮 Try the Studio Live — stable URL that always redirects to the current running studio tunnel.
Run it:
pip install -r requirements.txt
ollama serve & ollama pull qwen3:latest # any local chat model
STUDIO_DATA_DIR="$PWD/studio_api/data" \
uvicorn studio_api.main:app --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8200 --log-level warning
# Studio UI → http://localhost:8200/studio · API docs → /docs
One-command end-to-end demo (builds a graph + drives a fully-wired agent through graph reasoning, memory recall, PII redaction, and a guardrail block):
python3 demos/agent-studio/sample_pipeline.py --model qwen3:latest
What's inside — full Studio feature set
- 🧩 Knowledge Graph builder & explorer — ingest text, extract entities/relationships locally, inspect nodes/edges with grounded evidence.
- 🔎 Graph Q&A with citations — multi-hop answers backed by
[doc#chunk]source attribution. - 🤖 Agent workspace — create/edit agents with model selection, prompt/persona settings, and per-agent capability toggles.
- 🔀 Governed orchestration pipeline — per-turn flow of Guardrails → Memory → Knowledge Graph → Headroom budget → Tools → Data log, with full trace visibility.
- 🧰 Editable tools catalog — add, edit, enable/disable, test, and delete tools directly in Studio.
- 🌐 External real tool support — call real HTTP endpoints with configurable method, auth header, and custom headers.
- 🔌 MCP bridge integrations — local MCP proxy connectors (e.g. Chrome DevTools MCP, Unity MCP) with health-aware probing.
- 🛡️ Guardrails — PII redaction and policy-block controls with visible guardrail-block metrics.
- 🧠 Memory + Data logs — per-agent short-term memory and interaction-log persistence.
- 📈 Evaluation & fine-tune simulation — run eval suites, track pass-rate trends, and queue/monitor fine-tune jobs.
- 💬 Playground — run governed agent conversations live and inspect the pipeline trace.
- 📊 KPI dashboard — active agents, connected tools, eval pass rate, and guardrail-block counters.
See studio_api/README.md for API and architecture, and docs/STUDIO_ENTERPRISE_TEST.md for enterprise test scenarios.
📋 Examples
| # | Example | What it demonstrates | Run |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sample_pipeline.py | Studio agent pipeline — ingests a company brief → builds KG → multi-hop Q&A with citations → memory recall → PII redaction → guardrail block → audit log. | python3 demos/agent-studio/sample_pipeline.py |
| 2 | sample_tools_explorer.py | Tool catalog seeder — registers 17 tools and creates sample explorer agents. Idempotent. | python3 demos/agent-studio/sample_tools_explorer.py |
| 3 | clinical-kg/ | Medical AI — Clinical Knowledge Graph — de-identifies notes (Safe Harbor), extracts entities, detects contradictions, normalizes to ICD-10/RxNorm/SNOMED/LOINC, builds patient KG with citations. | cd clinical-kg/backend && python run.py |
| 4 | municipality-incident-chatbot/ | DMT Inspection System — citizen incident reporting with CV validation (YOLO/VLM), KG-grounded routing, evidence fusion, case registration. | cd municipality-incident-chatbot && python cli.py |
🏥 Example 3 — Medical AI: HIPAA-Safe Clinical Knowledge Graph
Turn unstructured clinical notes into a governed, citable knowledge graph — fully on-prem.
The 7-step pipeline:
| Step | What it does |
|---|---|
| De-identify | Safe Harbor regex redaction with a sealed SurrogateVault for audited re-identification |
| Extract | Section-aware NER, med-sig / lab-value parsing, ConText axes (negation, certainty, temporality, experiencer) |
| Reconcile | Groups mentions by concept; detects contradictions across notes (e.g. "no diabetes" in HPI vs "T2DM" in problem list) |
| Normalize | Maps mentions → coded concepts (ICD-10-CM, RxNorm, SNOMED CT, LOINC) |
| Knowledge Graph | Patient / Encounter / Condition / Medication / LabResult nodes with EVIDENCED_BY provenance edges |
| Query | NL → structured CohortQuery → multi-hop traversal with [doc#chunk] citations |
| Governance | k-anonymity over released cohorts |
# Backend (FastAPI on :8300)
cd clinical-kg/backend
pip install -r requirements.txt
python run.py
# Frontend (Next.js dashboard on :3200)
cd clinical-kg/frontend
npm install && npm run dev
Open http://localhost:3200 → click Load sample notes → run queries. The UI has 6 tabs: Cohort Query, Ingest Note, Patients, Contradictions, Graph, Re-ID Risk.
🏛️ Example 4 — DMT Inspection System: Municipality Incident Chatbot
AI chatbot for citizens to report civic incidents, validated by computer vision and grounded by a knowledge graph.
Pipeline flow: citizen photo + description → KG classification → CV validation (YOLO/VLM) → cross-check (CCTV, location, prior reports) → evidence fusion → case registration.
Supported incidents: trash overflow · abandoned vehicles · overcrowding · illegal parking (extensible)
cd municipality-incident-chatbot
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Interactive CLI
python cli.py
# you> trash overflowing near the market | photo=garbage_overflow.jpg | zone=downtown
# Test suite
python -m pytest -q
| Component | File |
|---|---|
| Knowledge graph (grounding + routing) | app/knowledge_graph.py |
| CV validation (YOLO + VLM) | app/cv_service.py |
| Evidence fusion & scoring | app/fusion.py |
| Chatbot orchestrator | app/orchestrator.py |
| Architecture docs | 01_architecture.md |
Enterprise scenario — follow the Northwind Bank compliance test playbook for a guided walkthrough using realistic financial-services data.
For API-level examples and curl recipes, see studio_api/README.md.
🌳 + 🔗 Graph + Tree: the ultimate retrieval
Why choose? VeritasGraph includes the hierarchical "Table of Contents" navigation of PageIndex PLUS the semantic reasoning of a Knowledge Graph.
Document Root
├── [1] Introduction
│ ├── [1.1] Background ←── Tree Navigation
│ └── [1.2] Objectives
├── [2] Methodology ←───────── Graph Links
│ └── relates_to ──────────→ [3.1] Findings
└── [3] Results
📊 Feature comparison
| Feature | Vector RAG | PageIndex | VeritasGraph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrieval type | Similarity | Tree search | 🏆 Tree + Graph reasoning |
| Attribution | ❌ Low | ⚠️ Medium | ✅ 100% verifiable |
| Multi-hop reasoning | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Tree navigation (TOC) | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Semantic search | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Cross-section linking | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Visual graph explorer | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ Built-in UI |
| 100% local/private | ⚠️ Varies | ❌ Cloud | ✅ On-premise |
| Open source | ⚠️ Varies | ❌ Proprietary | ✅ MIT license |
🎬 See it in action
💡 What you're seeing: a query triggers multi-hop reasoning across the knowledge graph. Nodes light up as connections are discovered, showing exactly how the answer was found — not just what was found.
🔌 MCP Server — connect your IDE agent to VeritasGraph
VeritasGraph ships a dedicated Model Context Protocol server — the first zero-trust, air-gapped Enterprise GraphRAG server for MCP. Connect Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Cline, or Continue directly to the GraphRAG engine over JSON-RPC 2.0 stdio, with zero external data egress.
python -m veritasgraph_mcp # from repo root (needs local Ollama for ingest/query)
Tools: veritasgraph_ingest_document, veritasgraph_query (multi-hop answers with [doc#chunk] citations), veritasgraph_search_entities, veritasgraph_get_graph, veritasgraph_clear_graph. See veritasgraph_mcp/README.md for IDE registration snippets.
🏥 VeritasGraph-MCP Use Case — Production Medical AI on Azure
Real-world deployment: VeritasGraph MCP server running on Azure Functions with Azure AI Foundry, delivering GraphRAG-powered clinical decision support with verifiable citations and compliance-ready architecture.
📖 Production deployment walkthrough
The Challenge: 90% of Azure AI demos work. Most never ship. The gap isn't the model — it's architecture, security, state management, and compliance.
The Solution: VeritasGraph deployed as a remote MCP server that Azure AI Foundry agents call to answer clinical questions with:
- ✅ Multi-hop GraphRAG reasoning — assembles answers from separate graph edges
- ✅ Verifiable citations — every claim traces to
[doc#chunk]sources - ✅ Production-grade architecture — externalized state, identity at boundary, observability
- ✅ Compliance-ready — region-pinned, PHI-aware guardrails, semantic-layer RBAC
Architecture highlights:
Foundry Agent / MCP client
→ Identity (Entra ID + function key)
→ Azure Functions (Flex Consumption, 4 mcpToolTrigger tools)
→ veritasgraph-mcp + graphrag_engine
→ Azure OpenAI (extraction + reasoning)
→ Knowledge Graph
→ Durable Azure Files mount (externalized state)
→ Storage + App Insights (observability)
Key production lessons learned:
- State externalization — Flex Consumption wiped in-memory graphs; fixed with mounted Azure Files share
- Identity at boundary — Carry Entra identity; enforce Power BI RLS / Dataverse roles on-behalf-of user
- Self-correcting agents — Feed errors + schema back; retry up to 3× (e.g., DAX generation)
- Compliance by design — Foundry guardrails block PHI-leaking requests before reaching the model
- Observability layers — Application Insights + Foundry Traces + Evaluations + Alerts
Example query flow:
{
"question": "Should we adjust warfarin for patient 4471 on amiodarone?",
"answer": "Reduce the warfarin dose because amiodarone inhibits CYP2C9...",
"citations": ["doc_warfarin_note#0", "doc_warfarin_note#1"],
"reasoning_path": ["Amiodarone → CYP2C9", "CYP2C9 → Warfarin", "Warfarin → Bleeding Risk"]
}
Technical stack:
- Compute: Azure Functions (Flex Consumption) — scales to zero, fast event-driven scale-out
- State: Azure Files mount — survives cold starts and scale events
- Inference: Azure OpenAI (gpt-4-turbo/gpt-5-mini, swappable)
- Identity: Entra ID + function/system key
- Observability: Application Insights + Foundry Traces
- Compliance: Region-pinned deployments, PHI-aware guardrails, Key Vault secrets
Deployed systems:
- Medical MCP Server — Clinical knowledge graph with multi-hop reasoning and
[doc#chunk]citations - Power BI Natural-Language Agent — Validates OAuth token → discovers schema → generates DAX → executes via
executeQueriesREST API with row-level security enforced by the platform
Resources:
- 📄 Read the full guide: From Proof of Concept to Production: Azure AI That Actually Ships — Complete walkthrough covering architecture, deployment, GraphRAG reasoning, auditability, semantic-layer access control, resilience, observability, and compliance.
- 💻 Azure AI Foundry + VeritasGraph Implementation Repository — Production deployment code, configuration, and examples.
Production-ready checklist:
- ✓ Grounded — answers cite your data (
[doc#chunk]) - ✓ State externalized — no reliance on serverless memory
- ✓ Identity at boundary — Entra + keys; on-behalf-of for data
- ✓ Entitlements enforced — RLS/roles before data reaches model
- ✓ Resilient — handles bad params, throttling, tool failures
- ✓ Observable — logs, traces, evals, cost alerts
- ✓ Region-pinned & compliant — inference in-tenant, PHI-aware
- ✓ Secrets in Key Vault — managed identity, least privilege
- ✓ Reproducible deploy — remote build, pinned config
💡 Key insight: The gap between POC and production is architecture, not the model. Ground it, externalize state, secure it, observe it, make it resilient, keep it compliant.
📖 Python API
from veritasgraph import VisionRAGPipeline
pipeline = VisionRAGPipeline() # auto-detects available models
doc = pipeline.ingest_pdf("document.pdf")
result = pipeline.query("What are the key findings?")
print(result.answer)
🌳 Hierarchical tree navigation + graph search
from veritasgraph import VisionRAGPipeline
pipeline = VisionRAGPipeline()
doc = pipeline.ingest_pdf("report.pdf")
# View the document's hierarchical structure (like a Table of Contents)
print(pipeline.get_document_tree())
# Document Root
# ├── [1] Introduction (pp. 1-5)
# │ ├── [1.1] Background (pp. 1-2)
# │ └── [1.2] Objectives (pp. 3-5)
# └── [2] Methodology (pp. 6-15)
# Navigate to a specific section (tree-based retrieval)
section = pipeline.navigate_to_section("Methodology")
print(section['breadcrumb']) # ['Document Root', 'Methodology']
# Or use graph-based semantic search
result = pipeline.query("What methodology was used?")
# → answer with section context: "📍 Location: Document > Methodology > Analysis Framework"
🔧 Custom configuration & ingestion modes
from veritasgraph import VisionRAGPipeline, VisionRAGConfig
config = VisionRAGConfig(ingest_mode="document-centric") # tables stay intact!
pipeline = VisionRAGPipeline(config)
doc = pipeline.ingest_pdf("annual_report.pdf")
| Mode | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
document-centric | Whole pages/sections as nodes (default) | Most documents |
page | Each page = one node | Slide decks, reports |
section | Each section = one node | Structured documents |
chunk | Traditional 500-token chunks | Legacy compatibility |
CLI
veritasgraph --version # show version
veritasgraph info # check dependencies
veritasgraph init my_project # initialize a project
veritasgraph ingest document.pdf --ingest-mode=document-centric # Don't Chunk. Graph.
veritasgraph ingest https://youtube.com/watch?v=xxx # auto-extract transcript
veritasgraph ingest https://example.com/article # extract web article
Installation options
pip install veritasgraph # basic (includes lite mode)
pip install veritasgraph[web] # Gradio UI + visualization
pip install veritasgraph[graphrag] # Microsoft GraphRAG integration
pip install veritasgraph[ingest] # YouTube & web-article ingestion
pip install veritasgraph[all] # everything
🏛️ Enterprise Compliance — VeritasGraph + VeritasReason
GraphRAG is brilliant at describing what your documents say. But enterprise questions like "Which purchase orders violated our Segregation-of-Duties policy last quarter?" are rule-evaluation problems over structured records — not similarity search.
For those, VeritasGraph ships a sister module: VeritasReason — a deterministic reasoning engine (forward-chaining + Rete + SPARQL) that fires policy rules over a triplet store and returns auditable answers with W3C PROV-O provenance.
Policy PDFs ─┐ ┌─ ingest_structured.py (SQL → triples + text)
▼ ▼
VeritasGraph GraphRAG VeritasReason (TripletStore + RuleSet
(quotes policy text) + ForwardChainer + PROV-O)
└──────────┬───────────────┘
▼
Compliance answer + violators table + clause citations
30-second smoke test (no install, stdlib only)
python tests/test_policy_compliance_demo.py
Seeds a fake ERP into a tiny in-memory triple store, evaluates four SoD rules from rules/sod_policy.yaml, and prints violators with citations:
✓ Reasoner fired. Detected 4 violation(s):
po:PO-2204 SOD-01 Approved & paid by emp:E118
po:PO-2301 SOD-02 Requested & approved by emp:E091
po:PO-2317 SOD-03 $48,750.00 approved by emp:E091 (role:Manager, not Director)
po:PO-2402 SOD-04 Vendor vendor:V77 related to approver emp:E140
Or install and run the packaged demo:
pip install veritas-reason
veritasreason-policy-demo
The same pattern applies to leave-policy violations (HRIS attendance), expense-report fraud (ledger + receipts), clinical protocol breaches (EHR + guidelines), or KYC/AML (transactions + watchlists). Define the SQL → triple mapping in ingest_structured.py, write rules in rules/*.yaml, and ask in plain English. See veritas-reason/plan.md for a full walk-through.
🔗 Interactive Graph Visualization
VeritasGraph includes an interactive 2D knowledge-graph explorer (PyVis) that visualizes entities and relationships in real time.

| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Query-aware subgraph | Shows only entities related to your query |
| Community coloring | Nodes grouped by community membership |
| Red highlight | Query-related entities shown in red |
| Node sizing | Bigger nodes = more connections |
| Interactive | Drag, zoom, hover for entity details |
| Full graph explorer | View the entire knowledge graph |
⚙️ Provider Support (OpenAI-compatible)
VeritasGraph works with any OpenAI-compatible API — mix and match cloud and local:
| Provider | API Base | API Key | Example Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ollama (default) | http://localhost:11434/v1 | ollama | llama3.1-12k |
| OpenAI | https://api.openai.com/v1 | sk-proj-... | gpt-4-turbo-preview |
| Groq | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 | gsk_... | llama-3.1-70b-versatile |
| Together AI | https://api.together.xyz/v1 | your-key | Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-Turbo |
| LM Studio | http://localhost:1234/v1 | lm-studio | (model loaded in LM Studio) |
Also supported: Azure OpenAI, OpenRouter, Anyscale, LocalAI, vLLM.
cd graphrag-ollama-config
cp settings_openai.yaml settings.yaml
cp .env.openai.example .env # edit with your provider settings
python -m graphrag.index --root . --config settings_openai.yaml
python app.py
⚠️ Embeddings must match your index. If you indexed with
nomic-embed-text(768 dims), you must query with the same model — switching embedding models requires re-indexing. Full details in OPENAI_COMPATIBLE_API.md.
🐳 Deployment
Five-Minute Magic Onboarding (Docker)
Run a full stack (Ollama + Neo4j + Gradio) with one command:
cd docker/five-minute-magic-onboarding
# set your Neo4j password in .env, then:
docker compose up --build
Services: Gradio UI → http://127.0.0.1:7860 · Neo4j → http://localhost:7474 · Ollama → http://localhost:11434. See docker/five-minute-magic-onboarding/README.md.
Share with your team (free)
| Method | Duration | Local Ollama | Setup | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
python app.py --share | 72 hours | ✅ | 1 min | Quick demos |
| Ngrok tunnel | Unlimited* | ✅ | 5 min | Team evaluation |
| Cloudflare tunnel | Unlimited* | ✅ | 5 min | Team evaluation |
| Hugging Face Spaces | Permanent | ❌ (cloud LLM) | 15 min | Public showcase |
*Free tier has some limitations.
🏗️ Architecture
graph TD
subgraph "Indexing Pipeline (one-time)"
A[Source Documents] --> B{Document Chunking};
B --> C{"LLM Extraction<br/>(Entities & Relationships)"};
C --> D[Vector Index];
C --> E[Knowledge Graph];
end
subgraph "Query Pipeline (real-time)"
F[User Query] --> G{Hybrid Retrieval Engine};
G -- "1. Vector search for entry points" --> D;
G -- "2. Multi-hop graph traversal" --> E;
G --> H{Pruning & Re-ranking};
H -- "Rich context" --> I{LoRA-Tuned LLM Core};
I -- "Answer + provenance" --> J{Attribution Layer};
J --> K[Attributed Answer];
end
style A fill:#f2f2f2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style F fill:#e6f7ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style K fill:#e6ffe6,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
The four stages:
- Automated Knowledge Graph construction — chunk documents into
TextUnits, extract(head, relation, tail)triplets, assemble nodes + edges in a graph DB (e.g. Neo4j). - Hybrid retrieval engine — vector search finds entry nodes, multi-hop traversal uncovers hidden relationships, pruning & re-ranking keeps the most relevant facts.
- LoRA-tuned reasoning core — a locally hosted, LoRA-tuned open model generates attributed answers with efficient fine-tuning for reasoning + attribution.
- Attribution & provenance layer — propagates source IDs, chunks, and graph nodes into a structured, traceable JSON output.
On-premise prerequisites
Hardware: 16+ CPU cores · 64GB+ RAM (128GB recommended) · NVIDIA GPU with 24GB+ VRAM (A100 / H100 / RTX 4090).
Software: Docker & Docker Compose · Python 3.10+ · NVIDIA Container Toolkit.
Copy .env.example → .env and populate with environment-specific values.
Why VeritasGraph?
- ✅ Fully on-premise & secure — 100% control over your data and models.
- ✅ Verifiable attribution — every claim traces back to its source.
- ✅ Advanced graph reasoning — answers complex, multi-hop questions.
- ✅ Hierarchical tree + graph — PageIndex-style TOC navigation with graph flexibility.
- ✅ Governed agents — guardrails, memory, tools, and context budgeting wired together in Studio.
- ✅ Open-source & sovereign — MIT-licensed, no vendor lock-in.
Who is it for? Engineers building enterprise search, compliance assistants, research copilots, scientific literature explorers, and agent memory systems — anywhere "the answer" depends on how facts connect, not just whether they appear near each other in a vector index.
🙌 Acknowledgments
Builds on the foundational work of HopRAG, Microsoft GraphRAG, LangChain & LlamaIndex, and Neo4j.
🏆 Awards & Citation
Presented at the International Conference on Applied Science and Future Technology (ICASF 2025) — 📄 Appreciation Certificate.
@article{VeritasGraph2025,
title={VeritasGraph: A Sovereign GraphRAG Framework for Enterprise-Grade AI with Verifiable Attribution},
author={Bibin Prathap},
journal={International Conference on Applied Science and Future Technology (ICASF)},
year={2025}
}
Star History
Licensed under MIT. ⭐ Star the repo to follow the roadmap for open-source, governed GraphRAG.
Comments
New to MCP?
From what the protocol is to installing your first server, these answers cover most first questions.
An open protocol that defines how AI applications connect to external tools and data in a uniform way. Clients talk to the model; MCP servers provide tools, resources and prompt templates. They exchange standard messages, so one server can be reused by many clients.






