About linkedcheck
linkedcheck checks whether a PR's closing claim is supported by its text and changed-file scope, using the target issue title and supplied commit messages. It combines closing-keyword detection with title-term matches in file paths and processes only the provided text and paths.
Key features
- 01Find closing references in PRs and commits
- 02Distinguish mentions from closing claims
- 03Match issue-title terms in file paths
- 04Return four linkage verdicts
- 05Validate supplied input locally
Use cases
- 01Review whether a PR supports its issue-closing claim
- 02Flag closing claims without scope evidence
- 03Check changed paths for issue-title term overlap
MCP support
As an MCP server, it provides the check_pr_issue_link tool. Clients submit PR text, issue details, changed files, and optional commit messages to get a verdict and matched terms.
Configuration
Local server config is the same for every client. Copy it into your client’s MCP config file.
Tools
1Saved tool list · updated 1w ago
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pr_body | string | Yes | Pull request body text |
| issue_title | string | Yes | Title of the issue the PR claims to close |
| issue_number | integer | Yes | Number of the issue the PR claims to close |
| changed_files | array | Yes | Paths of the files the PR changes |
| commit_messages | array | No | Commit messages of the PR (optional) |
Details
From the project READMElinkedcheck
A pull request that says "fixes #123" in its description has made a claim, not a proof. The files it touches might have nothing to do with the issue at all, and a reviewer skimming a long queue has no quick way to tell a genuine link from a hopeful one. linkedcheck checks the claim against two independent signals: the words of the PR itself, and the scope of its diff.
The first signal is linkage in the text. The PR body is
scanned first, then each commit message in order, for a
closing reference: one of the closing keywords close,
closes, closed, fix, fixes, fixed, resolve,
resolves, or resolved — case-insensitive, as a whole
word — followed by optional whitespace and #<issue_number>.
The number must match as a whole token, so #12 is not a
reference to issue 123 and #1234 is not either. Any bare
#<issue_number> occurrence, keyword or not, counts as a
mention, and a closing reference always counts as one too.
The second signal is scope. The issue title is lowercased
and split on runs of characters outside [a-z0-9]; tokens
shorter than three characters and a fixed list of stopwords
(the, a, an, in, on, of, for, to, when,
with, and, or, is, are, be, by, at, as,
it, this, that) are dropped. What remains are the
title's terms. Each changed file path is tokenised the same
way, and matched_terms is the sorted list of terms that
also appear as file tokens — so an issue about a login
redirect matching src/login/redirect.ts is real overlap,
not a coincidence of prose.
The two signals combine into one verdict:
linked— a closing reference exists and at least one term matches.weak— a closing reference exists but no term matches: claimed, with no scope evidence behind it.mentioned_only— the issue is mentioned but no closing keyword claims it.unlinked— neither a closing reference nor a mention.
Malformed input — a missing or non-string pr_body, an
issue_number that is not an integer of at least 1, a
missing, empty, or non-string issue_title, a
changed_files list that is missing, not an array, or
holding a non-string or empty entry, or a
commit_messages value that is not an array of strings —
is a validation error naming the offending path, with no
partial result. The computation is pure and local: no
network, no configuration, and no repository is read —
linkedcheck only checks the texts and paths you hand it.
CLI
npx @reneturcios/linkedcheck check --input args.json
npx @reneturcios/linkedcheck --version
args.json contains the full arguments object:
{
"pr_body": "Fixes #123",
"issue_number": 123,
"issue_title": "Fix login redirect loop",
"changed_files": ["src/login/redirect.ts"],
"commit_messages": []
}
The result is printed as JSON:
{
"verdict": "linked",
"closing_reference": true,
"mentioned": true,
"matched_terms": ["login", "redirect"],
"term_count": 4
}
Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including
an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2
on a usage error.
MCP server
npx -y @reneturcios/linkedcheck mcp
MCP client config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"linkedcheck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/linkedcheck", "mcp"]
}
}
}
Tools
-
check_pr_issue_link— Verify that a pull request actually addresses the issue it claims to close.pr_body(string, required, may be empty) — pull request body textissue_number(integer, required, at least 1) — number of the issue the PR claims to closeissue_title(string, required, non-empty) — title of the issue the PR claims to closechanged_files(array of strings, required, may be empty) — paths of the files the PR changescommit_messages(array of strings, optional, default[]) — commit messages of the PR
Returns
{verdict, closing_reference, mentioned, matched_terms, term_count}, whereterm_countis the number of distinct issue-title terms andmatched_termsis the sorted subset of them found in the changed files.
Docker
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/linkedcheck
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/linkedcheck check --input /w/args.json
Development
npm install
npm run build # tsc -> dist/
npm test # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)
npm run dev # run the CLI from source
License
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios
Comments
New to MCP?
From what the protocol is to installing your first server, these answers cover most first questions.
An open protocol that defines how AI applications connect to external tools and data in a uniform way. Clients talk to the model; MCP servers provide tools, resources and prompt templates. They exchange standard messages, so one server can be reused by many clients.