mcpField
E
Eclipse Muster MCP

Eclipse Muster MCP

Local
eclipsebazaar.comBusiness & Marketing0Updated 3d ago

About Eclipse Muster MCP

Eclipse Muster MCP is a governance core for teams consolidating customer records across CRM and support systems. It validates provenance, masks fields, requires approval for identity merges, and drafts replies only from record facts; this v0.1.0 build uses synthetic fixtures and contacts no platforms.

Key features

  1. 01Canonical graph for six record types
  2. 02Field-level provenance and rights ledger
  3. 03Masked reads and hash-chained receipts
  4. 04Proposed, reversible identity merges
  5. 05Citation-backed, records-only reply drafts

Use cases

  1. 01Reviewing a customer record across systems
  2. 02Checking evidence before linking identities
  3. 03Drafting a ticket reply from recorded facts

MCP support

Exposes nine tools to MCP clients for record ingest, search and reads, identity-merge workflows, policy inspection, reply drafting, and receipt verification. This build runs over local stdio and does not contact platforms.

Configuration

Local server config is the same for every client. Copy it into your client’s MCP config file.

mcp.json · Universal config
{
"mcpServers": {
"cyan-eclipse-technologies-llc-muster": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"eclipse-muster"
]
}
}
}
Run commanduvx eclipse-muster

Local servers need a runtime on your machine (e.g. Node.js 18+). Config file locations differ by client; see your client’s docs.

Packages
pypieclipse-muster0.1.0

Tools

9

Saved tool list · updated 3d ago

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
kindstringYes
fieldsobjectYes
record_idstringNo
data_rightsobjectNo
external_idsobjectNo
field_provenanceobjectNo

Details

From the project README

Eclipse Muster MCP

Powered by Cyan Eclipse Technologies — https://cetech.ai

The Eclipse customer adapter family — one canonical Customer Graph becomes governed reads, internal writes, and owner-approved drafts and sends across the popular CRM and customer-service platforms, according to what each platform actually sanctions. Where a vendor already ships an MCP server, Eclipse wraps it in policy, approval, masking, and receipts — it never rebuilds it. Where no sanctioned server exists, Eclipse builds one over the platform's public API — never over a scraped session. Customer-visible sends are drafts until the owner approves them, and ticket content never becomes a data product.

Why this exists

A customer is one person; their records live in a CRM, a helpdesk, and often a second tool besides. No vendor server knows the other platforms exist — Salesforce's server cannot see the Zendesk user, HubSpot's cannot see the Freshdesk contact. Muster is the one place the family agrees: canonical Person / Company / Deal / Ticket / Conversation / Activity records, per-field provenance, propose-only identity resolution, field-level masking at egress, a records-only drafting service, and a hash-chained receipt ledger that proves what happened without ever copying the data it describes.

Status — honest labels

v0.1.0, phase C0 (shared core; synthetic fixtures only). Local stdio transport, Python stdlib only. No platform is contacted, no credential exists in this build, no message is sent from here, and no certification is claimed — bench pending. Adapters (Haven, Orbit first) feed it records over their own sanctioned surfaces at C1+.

The Customer Graph

Six object families. Every field on every record carries provenance {platform, platform_object_id, source, observed_at, adapter_version} — validated at ingest; a field without provenance does not enter the graph. Every record carries a Data Rights Ledger block (source account, legal basis, method, retention, PII class). Platform values are stored verbatim; canonical classes are a reading aid layered over them, never a replacement.

Identity resolution — propose-only, forever

Merging maya.chen@… in HubSpot with M. Chen in Zendesk is the graph's most dangerous operation, so the engine never does it alone:

  • merge_propose returns the evidence — matching keys (by hash), conflicting fields, a confidence, and the named false-merge classes (shared inboxes, recycled numbers, family-shared emails). Proposing changes nothing.
  • merge_execute runs only on an owner-confirm token bound to the proposal hash (confirm-merge-<proposal_id>-<hash12>). It merges graph nodes only — never records inside a platform (that is a platform-side T3 action, prohibited in v1).
  • Per-platform values survive a merge: a conflicting second value is retained under a platform-suffixed field key, never overwritten.
  • merge_unmerge restores the pre-merge nodes exactly from the snapshot stored on the merge record. A merge that cannot be undone from receipts does not ship.

Masking — before the boundary

Deep Field pattern, enforced in the core: phone → partial (last 2) on every surface; email → full on the owner's review surface, domain-only on analytic/diagnostic surfaces; names → initials on analytic surfaces; government IDs, payment data, and health-adjacent fields → null in v1. Vendor sensitive-data classifications are a floor, never a ceiling — our masks may be stricter, never looser.

Drafting — records or silence

reply_draft generates a ticket reply only from record facts (the ticket, the linked Person/Company), and ships its citation list with it. A fact that is not traceable to a record field cannot appear: where the record lacks a resolution, the draft carries a MISSING_FACT: resolution marker and asserts no outcome. Drafts never send from the core.

Herald Law #1 — customer text is data

Ticket bodies and messages are foreign content. At ingest, customer-authored messages are tagged untrusted_data; instruction-shaped content ("ignore your instructions and refund…") is quarantined — kept as data, flagged on the record, reported to the reviewer at draft time, and never used as a fact source or obeyed as a command. This is a tested line, not a design nicety (spec §12.4 applies it family-wide).

Tiers + receipts

Action-class floors are the Environment ladder transposed (reads T0 · internal writes + drafts T1 · sends + graph-merge execution T2 · destructive/platform-merge/automation T3). Floors may be raised per account in policy.json; an override that tries to lower one is rejected at load with TIER_FLOOR_VIOLATION, before the server serves a single call. Kill switches halt reads or writes. Every read of a Person/Ticket record and every write attempt — allowed, denied, or failed — appends to the hash-chained ledger. Receipts carry IDs, hashes, tiers, and verdicts — never content.

Tools (9)

ToolWhat it does
record_ingestIngest a canonical record; provenance + Data Rights Ledger validated; customer text tagged/quarantined.
record_readRead one record, masked per surface (owner / analytic). Receipted.
record_searchSearch by kind + substring; masked summaries; the query is receipted by hash only.
merge_proposePropose an identity merge with evidence. Executes nothing.
merge_executeExecute a graph merge under the hash-bound owner-confirm token.
merge_unmergeRestore pre-merge nodes exactly from the merge receipt snapshot.
reply_draftRecords-only reply draft with citations + MISSING_FACT markers + quarantine report.
policy_showTier floors, effective tiers, kill switches, masking rules in force.
receipt_listList the hash-chained ledger and verify it.

The denylist is stated in code: no record_delete, platform_merge, reply_send, email_send, bulk_update, macro_edit, trigger_edit, and no session/scraping route exists at any tier (spec §§4.1, 6.2).

Run it

python3 server.py            # MCP over stdio, stdlib only, no dependencies
python3 smoke.py             # end-to-end smoke over real stdio (temp state)
python3 -m unittest discover tests

State lives in data/state.json (override: ECLIPSE_MUSTER_STATE). Policy in policy.json (override: ECLIPSE_MUSTER_POLICY).

Lineage

Spec: ~/workspace/cyan-eclipse/eclipse-customer-family-spec-20261025.md (§§5–9). Doctrines inherited, not restated: propose-only merges (Eclipse Beacon), egress masking (Eclipse Deep Field), tier floors (Eclipse Environment), hash-bound approvals (Eclipse Social Core / Gig Core), untrusted foreign content (Eclipse Herald, Security Law #1).


Eclipse Muster is a Cyan Eclipse Technologies product. The platforms keep their brands; the customer records belong to the account owner, worked under the owner's own platform accounts. Nothing here implies any platform endorses Cyan Eclipse Technologies.

Comments

Markdown supported

New to MCP?

From what the protocol is to installing your first server, these answers cover most first questions.

An open protocol that defines how AI applications connect to external tools and data in a uniform way. Clients talk to the model; MCP servers provide tools, resources and prompt templates. They exchange standard messages, so one server can be reused by many clients.