Gossiphs

Gossiphs = Gossip Graphs

Tip

AI-ready: Use the gossiphs skill to analyze code relationships in any AI assistant.

Also available: Python SDK and MCP Server

"Zero setup" & "Blazingly fast" code file relationship analysis. Based on tree-sitter and git history.

What's it

Gossiphs can analyze the history of commits and the relationships between variable declarations and references in your codebase to obtain a relationship diagram of the code files.

It also allows developers to query the content declared in each file, thereby enabling free search for its references throughout the entire codebase to achieve more complex analysis.

graph TD
    A[main.py] --- S1[func_main] --- B[module_a.py]
    A --- S2[Handler] --- C[module_b.py]
    B --- S3[func_util] --- D[utils.py]
    C --- S3[func_util] --- D
    A --- S4[func_init] --- E[module_c.py]
    E --- S5[process] --- F[module_d.py]
    E --- S6[Processor] --- H[module_e.py]
    H --- S7[transform] --- I[module_f.py]
    I --- S3[func_util] --- D

Supported Languages

We are expanding language support based on Tree-Sitter Query, which isn't too costly. If you're interested, you can check out the contribution section.

Language	Status
Rust	✅
Python	✅
TypeScript	✅
JavaScript	✅
Golang	✅
Java	✅
Kotlin	✅
Swift	✅
C#	✅

You can see the rule files here.

Usage

Python

pip install gossiphs

Analyze your codebase with networkx within 30 lines:

import networkx as nx
from gossiphs import GraphConfig, create_graph, Graph

config = GraphConfig()
config.project_path = "../.."
graph: Graph = create_graph(config)

nx_graph = nx.DiGraph()

for each_file in graph.files():
    nx_graph.add_node(each_file, metadata=graph.file_metadata(each_file))

    related_files = graph.related_files(each_file)
    for each_related_file in related_files:
        related_symbols = set(each_symbol.symbol.name for each_symbol in each_related_file.related_symbols)

        nx_graph.add_edge(
            each_file,
            each_related_file.name,
            related_symbols=list(related_symbols)
        )

print(f"NetworkX graph created with {nx_graph.number_of_nodes()} nodes and {nx_graph.number_of_edges()} edges.")

for src, dest, data in nx_graph.edges(data=True):
    print(f"{src} -> {dest}, related symbols: {data['related_symbols']}")

Output:

NetworkX graph created with 13 nodes and 27 edges.
src/server.rs -> src/main.rs, related symbols: ['server_main']
src/main.rs -> src/graph.rs, related symbols: ['default']
src/main.rs -> examples/mini.rs, related symbols: ['default']
src/main.rs -> src/server.rs, related symbols: ['main']
src/symbol.rs -> src/graph.rs, related symbols: ['link_file_to_symbol', 'list_references', 'list_references_by_definition', 'id', 'enhance_symbol_to_symbol', 'add_file', 'add_symbol', 'list_definitions', 'list_symbols', 'new', 'link_symbol_to_symbol', 'get_symbol']
...

More examples can be found here.

Others

We also provide a CLI and additional usage options, making it easy to directly export CSV files or start an HTTP service.

See usage page.

Goal & Motivation

Tip

Create a file relationship index with:

• low cost
• acceptable accuracy
• high versatility for nearly any code repository

Code navigation is a fascinating subject that plays a pivotal role in various domains, such as:

• Guiding the context during the development process within an IDE.
• Facilitating more convenient code browsing on websites.
• Analyzing the impact of code changes in Continuous Integration (CI) systems.
• ...

In the past, I endeavored to apply LSP/LSIF technologies and techniques like Github's Stack-Graphs to impact analysis, encountering different challenges along the way. For our needs, a method akin to Stack-Graphs aligns most closely with our expectations. However, the challenges are evident: it requires crafting highly language-specific rules, which is a considerable investment for us, given that we do not require such high precision data.

We attempt to make some trade-offs on the challenges currently faced by stack-graphs to achieve our expected goals to a certain extent:

• Zero repo-specific configuration: It can be applied to most languages and repositories without additional configuration.
• Low extension cost: adding rules for languages is not high.
• Acceptable precision: We have sacrificed a certain level of precision, but we also hope that it remains at an acceptable level.

How it works

Gossiphs constructs a graph that interconnects symbols of definitions and references.

1. Extract imports and exports: Identify the imports and exports of each file.
2. Connect nodes: Establish connections between potential definition and reference nodes.
3. Refine edges with commit histories: Utilize commit histories to refine the relationships between nodes.

Unlike stack-graphs, we have omitted the highly complex scope analysis and instead opted to refine our edges using commit histories. This approach significantly reduces the complexity of rule writing, as the rules only need to specify which types of symbols should be exported or imported for each file.

While there is undoubtedly a trade-off in precision, the benefits are clear:

1. Minimal impact on accuracy: In practical scenarios, the loss of precision is not as significant as one might expect.
2. Commit history relevance: The use of commit history to reflect the influence between code segments aligns well with our objectives.
3. Language support: We can easily support the vast majority of programming languages, meeting the analysis needs of various types of repositories.

Precision

Static analysis has its limits, such as dynamic binding. Therefore, it is unlikely to achieve the level of accuracy provided by LSP, but it can offer sufficient accuracy in the areas where it is primarily used.

The method we use to demonstrate accuracy is to compare the results with those of LSP/LSIF. It must be admitted that static inference is almost impossible to obtain all reference relationships like LSP.

You can further combine your own needs and use other methods such as tfidf to process the results to meet more complex requirements.

Repo	Coverage of LSP Edges by Gossiphs
https://github.com/go-gorm/gorm	442/499 = 88.5 %
https://github.com/gin-gonic/gin	238/252 = 94.4%

Contribution

The project is still in a very early and experimental stage. If you are interested, please leave your thoughts through an issue. In the short term, we hope to build better support for more languages.

You just need to:

1. Edit rules in src/rule.rs
2. Test it in src/extractor.rs
3. Try it with your repo in src/graph.rs

Tree-sitter Playground is a good helper.

License

Apache 2.0