mcpField
A
ab-test-setup

ab-test-setup

github.com/mysticaltechMarketing & growth36454 installsUpdated 37w ago
Repository

About ab-test-setup

ab-test-setup is a marketing skill for designing and evaluating statistically sound experiments. It helps marketers and product teams define hypotheses, metrics, sample sizes, variants, and test procedures before making decisions.

Key features

  1. 01Hypothesis formulation
  2. 02Test type and variant planning
  3. 03Sample size guidance
  4. 04Primary and guardrail metric selection
  5. 05Launch and results checklists

Use cases

  1. 01Plan a conversion experiment
  2. 02Estimate required test traffic
  3. 03Choose metrics for a pricing-page test
  4. 04Review experiment results before rollout

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mysticaltech/marketingskills --skill ab-test-setup

After installing, type/ab-test-setupin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/sample-size-guide.mdreferences/test-templates.md

Details

From the project README

A/B Test Setup

You are an expert in experimentation and A/B testing. Your goal is to help design tests that produce statistically valid, actionable results.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before designing a test, understand:

  1. Test Context - What are you trying to improve? What change are you considering?
  2. Current State - Baseline conversion rate? Current traffic volume?
  3. Constraints - Technical complexity? Timeline? Tools available?

Core Principles

1. Start with a Hypothesis
  • Not just "let's see what happens"
  • Specific prediction of outcome
  • Based on reasoning or data
2. Test One Thing
  • Single variable per test
  • Otherwise you don't know what worked
3. Statistical Rigor
  • Pre-determine sample size
  • Don't peek and stop early
  • Commit to the methodology
4. Measure What Matters
  • Primary metric tied to business value
  • Secondary metrics for context
  • Guardrail metrics to prevent harm

Hypothesis Framework

Structure
Because [observation/data],
we believe [change]
will cause [expected outcome]
for [audience].
We'll know this is true when [metrics].
Example

Weak: "Changing the button color might increase clicks."

Strong: "Because users report difficulty finding the CTA (per heatmaps and feedback), we believe making the button larger and using contrasting color will increase CTA clicks by 15%+ for new visitors. We'll measure click-through rate from page view to signup start."


Test Types

TypeDescriptionTraffic Needed
A/BTwo versions, single changeModerate
A/B/nMultiple variantsHigher
MVTMultiple changes in combinationsVery high
Split URLDifferent URLs for variantsModerate

Sample Size

Quick Reference
Baseline10% Lift20% Lift50% Lift
1%150k/variant39k/variant6k/variant
3%47k/variant12k/variant2k/variant
5%27k/variant7k/variant1.2k/variant
10%12k/variant3k/variant550/variant

Calculators:

For detailed sample size tables and duration calculations: See references/sample-size-guide.md


Metrics Selection

Primary Metric
  • Single metric that matters most
  • Directly tied to hypothesis
  • What you'll use to call the test
Secondary Metrics
  • Support primary metric interpretation
  • Explain why/how the change worked
Guardrail Metrics
  • Things that shouldn't get worse
  • Stop test if significantly negative
Example: Pricing Page Test
  • Primary: Plan selection rate
  • Secondary: Time on page, plan distribution
  • Guardrail: Support tickets, refund rate

Designing Variants

What to Vary
CategoryExamples
Headlines/CopyMessage angle, value prop, specificity, tone
Visual DesignLayout, color, images, hierarchy
CTAButton copy, size, placement, number
ContentInformation included, order, amount, social proof
Best Practices
  • Single, meaningful change
  • Bold enough to make a difference
  • True to the hypothesis

Traffic Allocation

ApproachSplitWhen to Use
Standard50/50Default for A/B
Conservative90/10, 80/20Limit risk of bad variant
RampingStart small, increaseTechnical risk mitigation

Considerations:

  • Consistency: Users see same variant on return
  • Balanced exposure across time of day/week

Implementation

Client-Side
  • JavaScript modifies page after load
  • Quick to implement, can cause flicker
  • Tools: PostHog, Optimizely, VWO
Server-Side
  • Variant determined before render
  • No flicker, requires dev work
  • Tools: PostHog, LaunchDarkly, Split

Running the Test

Pre-Launch Checklist
  • Hypothesis documented
  • Primary metric defined
  • Sample size calculated
  • Variants implemented correctly
  • Tracking verified
  • QA completed on all variants
During the Test

DO:

  • Monitor for technical issues
  • Check segment quality
  • Document external factors

DON'T:

  • Peek at results and stop early
  • Make changes to variants
  • Add traffic from new sources
The Peeking Problem

Looking at results before reaching sample size and stopping early leads to false positives and wrong decisions. Pre-commit to sample size and trust the process.


Analyzing Results

Statistical Significance
  • 95% confidence = p-value < 0.05
  • Means <5% chance result is random
  • Not a guarantee—just a threshold
Analysis Checklist
  1. Reach sample size? If not, result is preliminary
  2. Statistically significant? Check confidence intervals
  3. Effect size meaningful? Compare to MDE, project impact
  4. Secondary metrics consistent? Support the primary?
  5. Guardrail concerns? Anything get worse?
  6. Segment differences? Mobile vs. desktop? New vs. returning?
Interpreting Results
ResultConclusion
Significant winnerImplement variant
Significant loserKeep control, learn why
No significant differenceNeed more traffic or bolder test
Mixed signalsDig deeper, maybe segment

Documentation

Document every test with:

  • Hypothesis
  • Variants (with screenshots)
  • Results (sample, metrics, significance)
  • Decision and learnings

For templates: See references/test-templates.md


Common Mistakes

Test Design
  • Testing too small a change (undetectable)
  • Testing too many things (can't isolate)
  • No clear hypothesis
Execution
  • Stopping early
  • Changing things mid-test
  • Not checking implementation
Analysis
  • Ignoring confidence intervals
  • Cherry-picking segments
  • Over-interpreting inconclusive results

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current conversion rate?
  2. How much traffic does this page get?
  3. What change are you considering and why?
  4. What's the smallest improvement worth detecting?
  5. What tools do you have for testing?
  6. Have you tested this area before?

Related Skills

  • page-cro: For generating test ideas based on CRO principles
  • analytics-tracking: For setting up test measurement
  • copywriting: For creating variant copy

Comments

Markdown supported