mcpField
A
android-ui-states-validation

android-ui-states-validation

github.com/krutikjainDesign & UI1476 installsUpdated 31w ago
Repository

About android-ui-states-validation

A skill for reviewing Android user-interface flows before release, focused on state coverage and recovery behavior rather than test-framework selection. It guides teams through a state matrix and identifies relevant screens and handoffs.

Key features

  1. 01Build state matrices for UI flows
  2. 02Review loading, empty, error, and offline states
  3. 03Check permissions and stale-data behavior
  4. 04Identify screens and state holders
  5. 05Hand off automation and accessibility work

Use cases

  1. 01Review an Android flow before release
  2. 02Find missing recovery paths for errors or denied permissions
  3. 03Check edge cases across Android screens

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/krutikjain/android-agent-skills --skill android-ui-states-validation

After installing, type/android-ui-states-validationin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

agents/
openai.yaml
references/
official-links.md
patterns.md
scenarios.md
scripts/
run_examples.sh

Details

From the project README

Android UI States Validation

When To Use

  • Use this skill when the request is about: validate android ui states, check loading empty error flow android, edge cases in android screen.
  • Primary outcome: Review Android UI flows for empty, loading, error, offline, and edge-case behavior before release.
  • Reach for this skill when the core question is state coverage and recovery UX, not which test framework or assertion library to use.
  • This skill decides what the user should see in each branch of the state matrix. android-testing-ui only validates that design with assertions and screenshots.
  • Handoff skills when the scope expands:
  • android-compose-accessibility
  • android-testing-ui

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user-visible journey, target device behavior, and failure states that matter.
  2. Build a state matrix that covers loading, content, empty, error, offline, stale-data, denied-permission, and post-action confirmation states as applicable.
  3. Identify the owning screens, activities, destinations, and state holders for each branch of that matrix.
  4. Validate recovery UX, accessibility, configuration changes, and back-stack behavior in the showcase apps.
  5. Hand off to testing only when the missing work is about assertions or automation rather than state design.

Guardrails

  • Treat loading, empty, error, offline, and permission-denied states as first-class UI states.
  • Do not hide navigation or permission side effects inside reusable UI components.
  • Prefer lifecycle-aware APIs over manual callback chains.
  • Keep deep links, intents, and permission prompts testable and observable.
  • Distinguish transient messages, persistent error states, and stale-but-usable content instead of collapsing them into one generic failure screen.

Anti-Patterns

  • Assuming the happy path is enough for product flows.
  • Hard-coding request codes or route strings in multiple places.
  • Triggering navigation directly from repositories or network layers.
  • Shipping flows without recovery UI for denied permissions or broken state.
  • Using tests as a substitute for deciding what the product should show in each failure mode.

Examples

Happy path
  • Scenario: Validate OrbitTasks loading, content, and success confirmation states.
  • Command: cd examples/orbittasks-compose && ./gradlew :app:connectedDebugAndroidTest
Edge case
  • Scenario: Exercise long content, empty lists, and sync failures in the XML fixture.
  • Command: cd examples/orbittasks-xml && ./gradlew :app:connectedDebugAndroidTest
Failure recovery
  • Scenario: Avoid misrouting UI validation work to accessibility or testing-only skills.
  • Command: python3 scripts/eval_triggers.py --skill android-ui-states-validation

Done Checklist

  • The implementation path is explicit, minimal, and tied to the right Android surface.
  • Relevant example commands and benchmark prompts have been exercised or updated.
  • Handoffs to adjacent skills are documented when the request crosses boundaries.
  • Official references cover the chosen pattern and the main migration or troubleshooting path.

Official References

Comments

Markdown supported