mcpField
A
api-design-reviewer

api-design-reviewer

github.com/borgheiTesting & quality1.0k162 installsUpdated 1w ago
Repository

About api-design-reviewer

api-design-reviewer is a skill for engineering teams reviewing REST API designs and OpenAPI or Swagger specifications. It combines convention linting, version-diff analysis, and scored design reviews, with migration guidance for breaking changes.

Key features

  1. 01Check REST naming and conventions
  2. 02Detect breaking changes between specs
  3. 03Score designs across five dimensions
  4. 04Generate migration guides and recommendations

Use cases

  1. 01Review a new REST API or contract
  2. 02Validate OpenAPI or Swagger specifications
  3. 03Compare releases and manage API versions
  4. 04Gate API quality in CI

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill api-design-reviewer

After installing, type/api-design-reviewerin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

references/
api_antipatterns.md
rest_design_rules.md
rest-design-patterns.md
tooling-ci-and-troubleshooting.md
scripts/
api_linter.py
api_scorecard.py
breaking_change_detector.py

Details

From the project README

API Design Reviewer

Comprehensive analysis and review of REST API designs against conventions, best practices, and industry standards. Helps engineering teams build consistent, maintainable, well-designed APIs through automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards.

Core Capabilities

  • API linting & convention analysis — resource naming (kebab-case URLs, camelCase fields), HTTP method usage, URL structure, status-code compliance, error-format consistency, and documentation coverage.
  • Breaking change detection — endpoint removal, response-shape changes, field removal/rename, type changes, new required fields, and status-code changes between two spec versions, with migration guides.
  • API design scoring — weighted scorecard across Consistency (30%), Documentation (20%), Security (20%), Usability (15%), and Performance (15%), with letter grades A–F and recommendations.

When to Use

  • Designing a new REST API or reviewing an API contract.
  • Validating an OpenAPI/Swagger spec against REST conventions.
  • Managing API versioning and detecting breaking changes between releases.
  • Gating deployments on API design quality in CI.

Clarify First

Before producing the review, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Which output — lint report, design scorecard, or breaking-change detection (selects api_linter.py, api_scorecard.py, or breaking_change_detector.py)
  • Spec file(s) — the OpenAPI/Swagger JSON, or the two versions to diff (the input the tools parse)
  • Quality bar / CI gate — minimum grade or fail-on-breaking (sets --min-grade / --exit-on-breaking and how strict the verdict is)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.

Tools

ToolPurposeCommand
api_linter.pyLint an OpenAPI/Swagger JSON spec for REST conventions and best practicespython scripts/api_linter.py openapi.json --format json
breaking_change_detector.pyDetect breaking changes between two spec versions (with migration guides)python scripts/breaking_change_detector.py v1.json v2.json --exit-on-breaking
api_scorecard.pyScore API design quality across 5 weighted dimensions (A–F grades)python scripts/api_scorecard.py openapi.json --min-grade B

References

Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:

  • references/rest-design-patterns.md — REST naming/method/URL principles, versioning strategies, pagination patterns, error formats and status codes, auth/RBAC patterns, rate limiting, HATEOAS, idempotency, backward-compatibility rules, OpenAPI validation, performance, and security best practices. Read when designing or reviewing endpoints.
  • references/tooling-ci-and-troubleshooting.md — the three tools' features, CI/CD and pre-commit integration, best-practices and anti-pattern checklists, troubleshooting table, success criteria, and full CLI flag references. Read when wiring tools into pipelines or debugging.
  • references/rest_design_rules.md — detailed REST design rules reference (resources vs actions, HTTP method semantics with worked examples). Read for an in-depth rules catalog.
  • references/api_antipatterns.md — common API anti-patterns (verb-based URLs / RPC trap and more) with bad/good examples and recommended fixes. Read when auditing an existing API for design smells.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Linting OpenAPI 3.x and Swagger 2.0 JSON specifications against REST conventions
  • Detecting breaking, potentially-breaking, and non-breaking changes between two spec versions
  • Scoring API design quality across consistency, documentation, security, usability, and performance
  • Generating actionable migration guides when breaking changes are found

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Runtime API testing, load testing, or contract testing (see api-test-suite-builder)
  • GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket API design review
  • Auto-generation of OpenAPI specs from code or server stubs
  • Authentication flow implementation or OAuth server configuration (see senior-security in engineering/)

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
engineering/api-test-suite-builderGenerate test cases from linter findingsLinter issues feed into test plan priorities for endpoint validation
engineering/changelog-generatorDocument breaking changes in release notesBreaking change detector output provides structured change data for changelogs
engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builderGate deployments on API qualityScorecard grade and linter exit codes integrate as pipeline quality gates
engineering/senior-backendReview API implementation against designScorecard recommendations guide backend refactoring decisions
engineering/code-reviewerEnrich PR reviews with API analysisLinter and breaking change reports attach to PR review comments
engineering/release-managerValidate version bumps match change severityBreaking change detector severity levels inform semver version decisions

Comments

Markdown supported