mcpField
A
architecture-decision-records

architecture-decision-records

github.com/wshobsonDevelopment41.9k22.9k installsUpdated 2w ago
Repository

About architecture-decision-records

architecture-decision-records is a skill for creating and maintaining records of significant technical decisions. It helps teams document context, choices, trade-offs, consequences, and decision status for future review and onboarding.

Key features

  1. 01ADR 内容与生命周期
  2. 02撰写时机判断
  3. 03决策目录与索引管理
  4. 04提案审查清单
  5. 05弃用与替代记录

Use cases

  1. 01记录架构技术选型
  2. 02说明设计权衡与后果
  3. 03向新团队成员介绍历史决策
  4. 04管理已弃用或被替代的决策

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill architecture-decision-records

After installing, type/architecture-decision-recordsin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/decision-templates.mdreferences/deprecation-rfc-templates.md

Details

From the project README

Architecture Decision Records

Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.

When to Use This Skill

  • Making significant architectural decisions
  • Documenting technology choices
  • Recording design trade-offs
  • Onboarding new team members
  • Reviewing historical decisions
  • Establishing decision-making processes

Core Concepts

1. What is an ADR?

An Architecture Decision Record captures:

  • Context: Why we needed to make a decision
  • Decision: What we decided
  • Consequences: What happens as a result
2. When to Write an ADR
Write ADRSkip ADR
New framework adoptionMinor version upgrades
Database technology choiceBug fixes
API design patternsImplementation details
Security architectureRoutine maintenance
Integration patternsConfiguration changes
3. ADR Lifecycle
Proposed → Accepted → Deprecated → Superseded
              ↓
           Rejected

Before drafting a standard, lightweight, or Y-statement ADR, read decision templates.

Before drafting a deprecation ADR or RFC, read deprecation and RFC templates.

ADR Management

Directory Structure
docs/
├── adr/
│   ├── README.md           # Index and guidelines
│   ├── template.md         # Team's ADR template
│   ├── 0001-use-postgresql.md
│   ├── 0002-caching-strategy.md
│   ├── 0003-mongodb-user-profiles.md  # [DEPRECATED]
│   └── 0020-deprecate-mongodb.md      # Supersedes 0003
ADR Index (README.md)
# Architecture Decision Records

This directory contains Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for [Project Name].

## Index

| ADR                                   | Title                              | Status     | Date       |
| ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- |
| [0001](0001-use-postgresql.md)        | Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database | Accepted   | 2024-01-10 |
| [0002](0002-caching-strategy.md)      | Caching Strategy with Redis        | Accepted   | 2024-01-12 |
| [0003](0003-mongodb-user-profiles.md) | MongoDB for User Profiles          | Deprecated | 2023-06-15 |
| [0020](0020-deprecate-mongodb.md)     | Deprecate MongoDB                  | Accepted   | 2024-01-15 |

## Creating a New ADR

1. Copy `template.md` to `NNNN-title-with-dashes.md`
2. Fill in the template
3. Submit PR for review
4. Update this index after approval

## ADR Status

- **Proposed**: Under discussion
- **Accepted**: Decision made, implementing
- **Deprecated**: No longer relevant
- **Superseded**: Replaced by another ADR
- **Rejected**: Considered but not adopted
Automation (adr-tools)
# Install adr-tools
brew install adr-tools

# Initialize ADR directory
adr init docs/adr

# Create new ADR
adr new "Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database"

# Supersede an ADR
adr new -s 3 "Deprecate MongoDB in Favor of PostgreSQL"

# Generate table of contents (to a separate file, so the hand-written
# index and guidelines in README.md are not overwritten)
adr generate toc > docs/adr/toc.md

# Link related ADRs
adr link 2 "Complements" 1 "Is complemented by"

Review Process

## ADR Review Checklist

### Before Submission

- [ ] Context clearly explains the problem
- [ ] All viable options considered
- [ ] Pros/cons balanced and honest
- [ ] Consequences (positive and negative) documented
- [ ] Related ADRs linked

### During Review

- [ ] At least 2 senior engineers reviewed
- [ ] Affected teams consulted
- [ ] Security implications considered
- [ ] Cost implications documented
- [ ] Reversibility assessed

### After Acceptance

- [ ] ADR index updated
- [ ] Team notified
- [ ] Implementation tickets created
- [ ] Related documentation updated

Best Practices

Do's
  • Write ADRs early - Before implementation starts
  • Keep them short - 1-2 pages maximum
  • Be honest about trade-offs - Include real cons
  • Link related decisions - Build decision graph
  • Update status - Deprecate when superseded
Don'ts
  • Don't change accepted ADRs - Write new ones to supersede
  • Don't skip context - Future readers need background
  • Don't hide failures - Rejected decisions are valuable
  • Don't be vague - Specific decisions, specific consequences
  • Don't forget implementation - ADR without action is waste

Comments

Markdown supported