About backend-db-performance
A database performance skill for developers investigating slow queries and schema bottlenecks. It emphasizes checking existing indexes and migrations, then verifying proposed fixes with EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
Key features
- 01Inspect slow queries with pg_stat_statements
- 02Detect N+1 queries and over-fetching
- 03Check indexes and migrations before changes
- 04Guide pagination and query batching
- 05Verify fixes with EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Use cases
- 01Investigate slow page loads or query timeouts
- 02Reduce N+1 queries in Prisma or Supabase
- 03Review index changes before migrations
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ kensaurus/ skills --skill backend-db-performanceAfter installing, type/backend-db-performancein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled filesreferences/queries.mdreferences/schema-and-indexes.md
Details
From the project READMEDatabase Optimization Skill
Degree of freedom: MIXED. Which query/index/N+1 to fix [HIGH freedom];
existing-index probes and EXPLAIN ANALYZE [LOW freedom — run exactly].
How to reason
- Observe — EXPLAIN ANALYZE /
pg_stat_statements/ existingpg_indexes - Interpret — seq scan vs N+1 vs over-fetch vs missing pagination
- Classify — add-index / eager-load / narrow-select / paginate / leave-alone
- Severity — write-path timeout outranks a 200ms list page
Worked example
Observe:
/feedp95 2.4s; Prisma logs 81 queries;pg_indexeshas noidx_posts_user_created. Interpret:findManyposts then per-rowuser.findUnique— N+1;ORDER BY created_atis a seq scan. Classify: eager-loadinclude: { author }+ composite index(user_id, created_at DESC). Verify: EXPLAIN ANALYZE → Index Scan; query count 2; p95 < 200ms. Did not add a duplicate index.
Self-critique before reporting
- Existing first — listed
pg_indexes/ migrations beforeCREATE INDEX - EXPLAIN — the claimed winner has ANALYZE output, not intuition
- No duplicate index — the proposed name was queried and absent
- Right owner — schema consistency →
audit-db-schema; RLS access →plan-rls-audit
Systematic approach to identifying and fixing database performance issues.
When to Use
- Slow page loads (database bottleneck)
- Query timeout errors
- N+1 queries
- Schema design review
- Index optimization
- Migration planning
Check existing first [LOW freedom — run exactly]
Before ANY optimization, verify current state:
- Check existing indexes:
SELECT indexname, indexdef FROM pg_indexes
WHERE schemaname = 'public' AND tablename = 'your_table';
- Check existing migrations:
ls -la supabase/migrations/ | grep -i "index\|optim\|perf"
- Check if index already exists:
SELECT 1 FROM pg_indexes WHERE indexname = 'your_proposed_index';
- Check Supabase advisors for current issues:
- Use
get_advisorsMCP tool for performance/security - Don't re-fix already addressed issues
Why: Duplicate indexes waste storage and slow writes. Always verify before adding.
Performance Investigation [HIGH freedom]
1. Identify Slow Queries
- Prisma:
new PrismaClient({ log: [{ emit: 'event', level: 'query' }] })anddb.$on('query', ...); log anything over 100 ms with its duration. - Postgres/Supabase:
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_stat_statements, then order bytotal_time DESC, readingtotal_time / callsandrows / calls.
Logging snippet and the pg_stat_statements query: references/queries.md §Identify slow queries.
2. Common Performance Issues
| Issue | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| N+1 Queries | Many small queries | Use include / eager load |
| Missing Index | Slow WHERE/JOIN | Add index on filtered columns |
| Full Table Scan | Slow on large tables | Add index, limit results |
| Over-fetching | Slow response | Select only needed fields |
| No Pagination | Memory issues | Add cursor/offset pagination |
N+1 Query Fix [HIGH freedom]
- Problem:
findManythen a per-rowfindUniquein a loop — 1 + N queries. - Fix: eager-load the relation; narrow it with a nested
selectso you do not over-fetch the join. - Supabase: one
.select('*, author:users(id, name, avatar)')call does the join.
// Good - 2 queries total
const posts = await db.post.findMany({
include: { author: { select: { id: true, name: true, avatar: true } } },
})
Bad/good Prisma and the Supabase equivalent: references/queries.md §N+1 query fix.
Index Optimization [HIGH freedom]
When to Add Indexes
Add index when column is used in:
WHEREclauses (filtering)JOINconditionsORDER BYclauses- Unique constraints
Don't add index when:
- Table is small (< 1000 rows)
- Column has low cardinality (few unique values)
- Column is rarely queried
- Table has heavy writes
Index Types
- Single-column for one filter; composite when
WHERE a = ? ORDER BY b(column order matters: equality first, then sort). - Unique index for constraints; partial index (
WHERE published = true) for a hot subset; GIN for JSONB, arrays andto_tsvectorsearch. - Prisma:
@@index([userId, createdAt(sort: Desc)]),@@unique([...])mirror the SQL.
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_user_created ON posts(user_id, created_at DESC); -- composite, order matters
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_published ON posts(created_at) WHERE published = true; -- partial
All six index forms and the Prisma model: references/schema-and-indexes.md §Index types, §Prisma index syntax.
Query Optimization Patterns [HIGH freedom]
- Select only needed fields —
select: { id, name, email }instead of the whole row. - Pagination — offset (
skip/take) is fine for small pages; cursor (cursor: { id },skip: 1) for large or infinite lists; returnnextCursorfrom the last row. - Batch —
createMany({ skipDuplicates })instead of a create loop;$transaction([...])for related writes. - Count —
db.post.count({ where }); pair it with the page query inside one$transaction.
const posts = await db.post.findMany({
take: limit,
skip: cursor ? 1 : 0, // skip the cursor row itself
cursor: cursor ? { id: cursor } : undefined,
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
})
const nextCursor = posts.length === limit ? posts[posts.length - 1].id : null
Select, both pagination styles, batching and count: references/queries.md §Select only needed fields through §Count optimization.
Schema Design Best Practices [HIGH freedom]
Normalization vs Denormalization
Normalize when:
- Data changes frequently
- Data integrity is critical
- Storage is a concern
Denormalize when:
-
Read performance is critical
-
Data rarely changes
-
Complex joins are slow
-
Normalized: a
post_stats(post_id PK → posts, view_count, like_count)table; denormalized: counters as columns onposts. -
Data types —
UUIDids,VARCHAR(n)for bounded strings,DECIMAL(10,2)for money,TIMESTAMPTZalways,ENUMfor fixed sets. -
Soft deletes — nullable
deletedAtwith@@index([deletedAt]); every read filtersdeletedAt: null.
SQL for both shapes, the data-type list and the soft-delete model: references/schema-and-indexes.md §Normalization, §Efficient data types, §Soft deletes.
Supabase-Specific Optimizations [HIGH freedom]
- RLS — a function call or sub-select per row (
get_user_team()) is slow; preferuser_id = auth.uid(), or anEXISTSjoin against the membership table when the rule needs it. - Edge Functions — move multi-query aggregations into one
supabase.rpc('get_dashboard_stats')call behindDeno.serveinstead of several client round trips.
CREATE POLICY "fast_policy" ON posts FOR SELECT USING (user_id = auth.uid());
Slow/fast/join policies and the Edge Function: references/schema-and-indexes.md §RLS performance, §Edge Functions.
Query Analysis [LOW freedom — run exactly]
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = 'abc123' ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20;
Look for: Seq Scan (bad on large tables), Index Scan (good), Nested Loop (check for N+1), high actual time. Annotated version: references/queries.md §EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
Key Metrics
| Metric | Target | Action if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| Query time | < 100ms | Add index, optimize |
| Rows scanned | < 10x returned | Add index |
| Memory usage | < 256MB | Add LIMIT, pagination |
| Connection count | < pool size | Use connection pooling |
Optimization Checklist [LOW freedom — do not skip]
- Queries logged and monitored
- Indexes on filtered/joined columns
- No N+1 queries (eager loading)
- Pagination on all list endpoints
- Select only needed fields
- Batch operations where possible
- Connection pooling configured
- RLS policies optimized
- EXPLAIN ANALYZE on slow queries
- Appropriate data types used