About backend-dev-guidelines
backend-dev-guidelines is a guidance skill for Node.js, Express, TypeScript and microservice backend work. It describes layered design, validation, error handling, observability and testing practices, while noting that its examples need adaptation to the target repository.
Key features
- 01Layered route-to-repository architecture
- 02Zod validation for external input
- 03Centralized configuration guidance
- 04Error handling and observability practices
- 05Unit, integration and repository testing
Use cases
- 01Plan an Express backend feature
- 02Review service and repository boundaries
- 03Add request validation and error handling
- 04Assess backend testing and monitoring needs
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ sickn33/ agentic-awesome-skills --skill backend-dev-guidelinesAfter installing, type/backend-dev-guidelinesin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled files
References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.
resources/async-and-errors.mdcomplete-examples.mdarchitecture-overview.mdconfiguration.mddatabase-patterns.mdmiddleware-guide.mdsentry-and-monitoring.mdvalidation-patterns.mdservices-and-repositories.mdrouting-and-controllers.mdtesting-guide.mdDetails
From the project READMEBackend Development Guidelines
(Node.js · Express · TypeScript · Microservices)
You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints.
Your goal is to build predictable, observable, and maintainable backend systems using:
- Layered architecture
- Explicit error boundaries
- Strong typing and validation
- Centralized configuration
- First-class observability
Use these patterns when they fit the target repository; its architecture, authorization model and dependency versions take precedence. This documentation does not ship a runnable service.
1. Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI)
Before implementing or modifying a backend feature, assess feasibility.
BFRI Dimensions (1–5)
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Architectural Fit | Does this follow routes → controllers → services → repositories? |
| Business Logic Complexity | How complex is the domain logic? |
| Data Risk | Does this affect critical data paths or transactions? |
| Operational Risk | Does this impact auth, billing, messaging, or infra? |
| Testability | Can this be reliably unit + integration tested? |
Score Formula
BFRI = (Architectural Fit + Testability) − (Complexity + Data Risk + Operational Risk)
Range: -13 → +7 (each input is 1–5). This is an informal discussion aid, not a validated risk model or merge gate.
Interpretation
| BFRI | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 6–7 | Lower concern | Proceed |
| 3–5 | Moderate | Add tests + monitoring |
| 0–2 | Risky | Refactor or isolate |
| < 0 | Dangerous | Redesign before coding |
When to Use
Automatically applies when working on:
- Routes, controllers, services, repositories
- Express middleware
- Prisma database access
- Zod validation
- Approved error tracking with redaction and destination/retention controls
- Configuration management
- Backend refactors or migrations
2. Architecture Pattern (When Adopted by the Repository)
1. Layered Architecture Option
Routes → Controllers → Services → Repositories → Database
- No layer skipping
- No cross-layer leakage
- Each layer has one responsibility
2. Routes Only Route
// ❌ NEVER
router.post('/create', async (req, res) => {
await prisma.user.create(...);
});
// ✅ ALWAYS
router.post('/create', (req, res) =>
userController.create(req, res)
);
Routes must contain zero business logic.
3. Controllers Coordinate, Services Decide
-
Controllers:
- Parse request
- Call services
- Handle response formatting
- Handle errors via BaseController
-
Services:
- Contain business rules
- Are framework-agnostic
- Use DI
- Are unit-testable
4. All Controllers Extend BaseController
export class UserController extends BaseController {
async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
try {
const user = await this.userService.getById(req.params.id);
this.handleSuccess(res, user);
} catch (error) {
this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
}
}
}
No raw res.json calls outside BaseController helpers.
5. Capture Unexpected Errors at One Approved Boundary
catch (error) {
Sentry.captureException(error);
throw error;
}
❌ console.log
❌ silent failures
❌ swallowed errors
6. unifiedConfig Is the Only Config Source
// ❌ NEVER
process.env.JWT_SECRET;
// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from '@/config/unifiedConfig';
config.auth.jwtSecret;
7. Validate All External Input with Zod
- Request bodies
- Query params
- Route params
- Webhook payloads
const schema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
});
const input = schema.parse(req.body);
No validation = bug.
3. Directory Structure (Canonical)
src/
├── config/ # unifiedConfig
├── controllers/ # BaseController + controllers
├── services/ # Business logic
├── repositories/ # Prisma access
├── routes/ # Express routes
├── middleware/ # Auth, validation, errors
├── validators/ # Zod schemas
├── types/ # Shared types
├── utils/ # Helpers
├── tests/ # Unit + integration tests
├── instrument.ts # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts # Express app
└── server.ts # HTTP server
4. Naming Conventions (Strict)
| Layer | Convention |
|---|---|
| Controller | PascalCaseController.ts |
| Service | camelCaseService.ts |
| Repository | PascalCaseRepository.ts |
| Routes | camelCaseRoutes.ts |
| Validators | camelCase.schema.ts |
5. Dependency Injection Rules
- Services receive dependencies via constructor
- No importing repositories directly inside controllers
- Enables mocking and testing
export class UserService {
constructor(
private readonly userRepository: UserRepository
) {}
}
6. Prisma & Repository Rules
-
Prisma client never used directly in controllers
-
Repositories:
- Encapsulate queries
- Handle transactions
- Expose intent-based methods
await userRepository.findActiveUsers();
7. Async & Error Handling
asyncErrorWrapper Required
For Express 4, route promises need an error-forwarding wrapper. Express 5 forwards rejected returned promises; avoid duplicate handlers.
router.get(
'/users',
asyncErrorWrapper((req, res) =>
controller.list(req, res)
)
);
Return or await the handler promise; a wrapper does not handle detached background work.
8. Observability & Monitoring
Required
- Approved error tracking with redaction and destination/retention controls
- Sampled performance tracing appropriate to the installed SDK
- Structured logs (where applicable)
Every critical path must be observable.
9. Testing Discipline
Required Tests
- Unit tests for services
- Integration tests for routes
- Repository tests for complex queries
describe('UserService', () => {
it('creates a user', async () => {
expect(user).toBeDefined();
});
});
No tests → no merge.
10. Review Signals
❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Skipping service layer ❌ Direct Prisma in controllers ❌ Missing validation ❌ Unvalidated environment access outside configuration bootstrap ❌ Unredacted or unapproved telemetry ❌ Untested business logic
Resource Guide
Read the relevant bundled resources before applying examples. Private project paths and @project-lifecycle-portal/database, SSOMiddleware, BaseController and configuration utilities are illustrative application components, not installed dependencies. Authenticate with access tokens, authorize every object/tenant action, allowlist public DTO fields, project response fields and protect cookie-authenticated mutations against CSRF.
11. Integration With Other Skills
- frontend-dev-guidelines → API contract alignment
- error-tracking → Sentry standards
- database-verification → Schema correctness
- analytics-tracking → Event pipelines
- skill-developer → Skill governance
12. Operator Validation Checklist
Before finalizing backend work:
- Risks discussed with evidence; no numeric score grants approval
- Layered architecture respected
- Input validated
- Errors captured in Sentry
- unifiedConfig used
- Tests written
- No anti-patterns present
13. Skill Status
Status: Illustrative patterns; target-specific compilation, tests and security review required Intended Use: Long-lived Node.js microservices with real traffic and real risk
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.