mcpField
B
biz-supply-chain

biz-supply-chain

github.com/asgard-ai-platformOther24339 installsUpdated 21w ago
Repository

About biz-supply-chain

A skill for analyzing and improving supply chains with the SCOR model. It guides end-to-end assessment across five processes, using metrics to identify bottlenecks and prioritize improvements.

Key features

  1. 01SCOR analysis across five processes
  2. 02Supply chain mapping
  3. 03Process-specific performance metrics
  4. 04Benchmarking and bottleneck diagnosis
  5. 05End-to-end improvement prioritization

Use cases

  1. 01Assessing a supply chain from supplier to customer
  2. 02Finding causes of delivery or inventory problems
  3. 03Comparing process performance with benchmarks

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-supply-chain

After installing, type/biz-supply-chainin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

examples/
sample_scenario.md
references/
inventory-models.md
scor-metrics.md

Details

From the project README

Supply Chain Analysis (SCOR Model)

Overview

The SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) model structures supply chain analysis into five core processes: Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return. It provides a common language for analyzing, benchmarking, and improving supply chain performance from supplier's supplier to customer's customer.

Framework

IRON LAW: End-to-End, Not Silo-by-Silo

Supply chain optimization must consider the ENTIRE chain. Optimizing
procurement (Source) without considering production capacity (Make) or
delivery capability (Deliver) creates bottlenecks downstream.

A local optimum in one process often creates a global problem elsewhere.
The Five SCOR Processes

1. Plan — Demand forecasting, supply planning, inventory strategy

  • Demand forecast accuracy, S&OP process, inventory policies
  • Question: "Do we make/buy the right amount at the right time?"

2. Source — Supplier selection, procurement, incoming quality

  • Supplier scorecards, lead times, sourcing strategy (single vs multi)
  • Question: "Are we getting the right inputs at the right cost and quality?"

3. Make — Production, assembly, manufacturing

  • Production scheduling, capacity utilization, quality control, WIP management
  • Question: "Are we converting inputs to outputs efficiently?"

4. Deliver — Order management, warehousing, transportation, last-mile

  • Order fulfillment rate, delivery speed, logistics cost, channel management
  • Question: "Are we getting products to customers reliably and affordably?"

5. Return — Returns processing, reverse logistics, warranty/repair

  • Return rate, reverse logistics cost, refurbishment, disposal
  • Question: "Are we handling returns efficiently and learning from them?"
Key Supply Chain Metrics
ProcessMetricFormula/Definition
PlanForecast Accuracy1 - |Actual - Forecast| / Actual
PlanInventory DaysInventory / (COGS / 365)
SourceSupplier On-Time RateOn-time deliveries / Total deliveries
SourceSupplier Defect RateDefective units / Total received
MakeOEEAvailability × Performance × Quality
DeliverPerfect Order RateOrders delivered on time, in full, without error
DeliverOrder-to-Delivery CycleTime from order to customer receipt
ReturnReturn RateReturns / Total shipments
Analysis Steps
  1. Map the current supply chain from supplier to customer
  2. Measure key metrics per SCOR process
  3. Benchmark against industry standards
  4. Identify the weakest process (highest gap to benchmark)
  5. Improve the weakest link first (same logic as TOC — chain is as strong as weakest link)

Output Format

# Supply Chain Analysis: {Company}

## Supply Chain Map
Supplier → [Source] → [Make] → [Deliver] → Customer
            ↑ [Plan] (coordinates all) ↑
                     [Return] ←

## SCOR Performance Dashboard
| Process | Key Metric | Current | Benchmark | Gap |
|---------|-----------|---------|-----------|-----|
| Plan | Forecast Accuracy | X% | 85%+ | {gap} |
| Source | Supplier On-Time | X% | 95%+ | {gap} |
| Make | OEE | X% | 85%+ | {gap} |
| Deliver | Perfect Order Rate | X% | 95%+ | {gap} |
| Return | Return Rate | X% | <5% | {gap} |

## Weakest Link Analysis
{Which process has the largest gap and why}

## Improvement Recommendations
1. {Process}: {specific improvement} → {expected metric impact}

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: SCOR analysis for a Taiwanese DTC electronics brand

ProcessMetricCurrentIssue
PlanForecast Accuracy62%Demand spikes around promotions are unpredicted
SourceSupplier On-Time88%Key component supplier in Shenzhen has inconsistent lead times
MakeOEE78%Reasonable for electronics assembly
DeliverPerfect Order Rate91%Last-mile carrier (���貓) loses 3% of packages
Weakest: Plan (62%) — fixing forecast accuracy would reduce both inventory (currently 45 days, target 30) and stockouts
Incorrect Application
  • Only analyzed Deliver (logistics) because "delivery is our biggest complaint" → Root cause was Plan (bad forecast → stockouts → backorders → late deliveries). Fixing delivery alone doesn't help. Violates Iron Law: end-to-end analysis.

Gotchas

  • Bullwhip effect: Small demand changes at retail amplify upstream. A 10% sales increase can trigger 40% production increase at the manufacturer. S&OP process mitigates this.
  • Single-source risk: One supplier = zero redundancy. The 2021 chip shortage proved this globally. Evaluate single-source dependencies explicitly.
  • Make-vs-Buy is a Source decision: Not just cost — consider IP protection, quality control, lead time, and supply security.
  • Last-mile is often the costliest: Last-mile delivery can be 40-50% of total logistics cost. Evaluate delivery model (own fleet vs 3PL vs pickup points).
  • Returns are a profit leak: Many companies treat returns as an afterthought. A 15% return rate in e-commerce means 15% of fulfillment cost is wasted plus reverse logistics cost.

References

  • For SCOR model detailed metrics, see references/scor-metrics.md
  • For inventory optimization methods, see references/inventory-models.md

Comments

Markdown supported