mcpField
B
brand-listening

brand-listening

github.com/brightdataMarketing & growth268231 installsUpdated 2w ago
Repository

About brand-listening

brand-listening is a brand monitoring skill for teams assessing public opinion across social platforms, news and reviews. It uses Bright Data CLI (`bdata`) to collect live mentions, then organizes them by sentiment and theme in a cited digest.

Key features

  1. 01Live mention collection
  2. 02Social, news and review sources
  3. 03Sentiment classification
  4. 04Theme clustering
  5. 05Cited digest and recommendations

Use cases

  1. 01Monitor reaction to a product launch
  2. 02Find recurring customer complaints
  3. 03Assess brand reputation over a time window
  4. 04Identify advocates and positive mentions

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/brightdata/skills --skill brand-listening

After installing, type/brand-listeningin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/sentiment-and-output.md

Details

From the project README

Brand Listening

Find out what people are actually saying about a brand across social platforms, news, and reviews — powered by live web data, not stale training knowledge. Combines the Bright Data CLI (bdata) for collection with a sentiment + theme analysis layer to deliver a cited, actionable digest.

Never answer brand-sentiment questions from training knowledge alone. Public sentiment changes daily. Always collect live mentions first, then classify and synthesize.

Prerequisites

  1. Bright Data CLI installed:
    curl -fsSL https://cli.brightdata.com/install.sh | bash
    
  2. One-time login completed:
    bdata login    # or: bdata login --device  (SSH / headless)
    

Verify before collecting:

if ! command -v bdata >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    echo "bdata CLI not installed — see skills/bright-data-best-practices/references/cli-setup.md"
elif ! bdata zones >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    echo "bdata not authenticated — run: bdata login"
fi

Halt and route to setup if either check fails.

Core Workflow

  1. Clarify scope — Which brand/product/person? Which platforms? What time window (default: last 30 days)? What does the user want to do with it (general health check, launch monitoring, complaint triage, advocacy hunting)?
  2. Discover, then collect — Use bdata search to find where the brand is being discussed, then bdata pipelines to pull structured mentions from each platform. Parallelize independent calls.
  3. Normalize — Collapse every raw result into the single mention schema in references/sentiment-and-output.md before any analysis.
  4. Classify & cluster — Assign sentiment per mention (with a reason), then group mentions into themes. Follow the sentiment guardrails — never inflate either side.
  5. Deliver — Produce the cited digest (Output A), optionally with the structured dataset (Output B). Every report ends with a "So what — recommendations" section.

Data Collection Rules

  • Discovery first. You rarely have the right URLs up front. Run bdata search "<brand> site:reddit.com" --json (and per-platform variants) to find threads, profiles, and articles, then feed those URLs to pipelines.
  • Prefer bdata pipelines over bdata scrape whenever a pre-built scraper exists for the platform. Pipelines return clean structured JSON (author, date, engagement, text).
  • Look up scrapers, never guess them. For each platform: bdata pipelines search "<platform> <data type>", then bdata pipelines info <dataset_id> <method> to see the input fields, then bdata pipelines run. Never guess a dataset_id or field names. Full workflow: the brightdata-cli skill, pipelines reference.
  • Always pass --json when you need to parse or pipe output.
  • Be cost-efficient — a standard sweep is ~6–12 bdata calls, not 50. Pull the highest-signal threads/profiles, not everything.
  • Parallelize independent calls across multiple Bash tool calls in one response.
  • Every mention needs a source URL. No unattributed quotes, ever.
  • Never fabricate sentiment or fill gaps. If a platform returns nothing, report it in "Gaps & caveats".

Platform Modules

Pick the platforms that fit the brand. Consumer/cultural brands skew TikTok/Instagram/Reddit; B2B/SaaS skews Reddit/X/review sites; local businesses skew Google Maps reviews.

Each run below uses the dataset_id you picked from the search line above it. Check bdata pipelines info <dataset_id> <method> first: extra inputs (comment count, days back) are --<field> <value> flags named there.

Reddit — honest, unfiltered sentiment
# Discover relevant threads
bdata search "<brand> site:reddit.com" --json
bdata search "<brand> review reddit" --json

# Pull structured post + comment data from the threads found
bdata pipelines search "reddit posts"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<reddit-thread-url>" -o reddit.json

Reddit is the single best source for candid opinions brand channels hide. Prioritize it.

X / Twitter — real-time reaction
bdata search "<brand>" --json                      # find recent discussion
bdata pipelines search "x posts"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<x-post-url>" -o x.json
Instagram — brand aesthetics, comments, advocacy
bdata pipelines search "instagram posts"         # profile posts; pick a method with info
bdata pipelines search "instagram comments"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<instagram-post-url>" -o ig_comments.json
TikTok — cultural relevance, viral sentiment
bdata pipelines search "tiktok posts"            # profile posts; pick a method with info
bdata pipelines search "tiktok comments"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<tiktok-video-url>" -o tt_comments.json
YouTube — reviews, tutorials, long-form opinion (comments are gold)
bdata search "<brand> review youtube" --json
bdata pipelines search "youtube videos"
bdata pipelines search "youtube comments"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<video-url>" -o yt_comments.json
Reviews — structured customer sentiment
# App-based products, local businesses, Facebook pages: find the review scraper
bdata pipelines search "google play"             # or "apple app store"
bdata pipelines search "google maps reviews"
bdata pipelines search "facebook reviews"
bdata pipelines run <dataset_id> collect_by_url "<listing-or-page-url>" -o reviews.json

# SaaS / software — discover then scrape (no pipeline)
bdata search "<brand> site:g2.com" --json
bdata search "<brand> site:capterra.com" --json
bdata scrape "<g2-or-capterra-url>"
News & press — coverage and tone
bdata search "<brand>" --json                  # general SERP, scan for news
bdata scrape "<article-url>"                    # pull full article text for tone

Never hardcode a scraper. The catalog changes, and two scrapers can share a name. Always pick the dataset_id from bdata pipelines search and the fields from bdata pipelines info in the same session.

Choosing What to Collect

User says...Collect from
"What are people saying about us / my brand"Reddit + X + reviews + news (broad sweep)
"How did our launch land" / "buzz around X"TikTok + Instagram + X + YouTube (recency-focused)
"Find complaints / what people hate"Reddit + reviews (G2/Capterra/app stores) + YouTube comments
"Who's advocating for us / fans"Instagram + TikTok + X (high-engagement positive posts)
"Reputation / sentiment over time"Same sources, two windows — compare prior vs current
Local business reputationGoogle Maps reviews + Facebook reviews

Sentiment, Themes & Output

Read references/sentiment-and-output.md for:

  • The normalized mention record schema (use it as the row shape for both analysis and the dataset output).
  • The sentiment method + guardrails (classify from text as written; sarcasm/ambiguous → mixed; always report counts and percentages with the denominator).
  • Theme clustering — where the actionable insight lives.
  • Output templates — A (digest report), B (structured dataset), C (both).

Output Quality Standards

  1. Every mention has a source URL — no unattributed claims.
  2. Facts separate from interpretation — the quote is the fact; your sentiment label is interpretation. Keep them distinct.
  3. Percentages always carry N — "61% positive of 142 classified mentions", never a bare percentage.
  4. Be honest about gaps — list platforms that returned nothing this window. Note small samples that can't generalize.
  5. Date-stamp everything — "Data collected on · window: last days".
  6. End with "So what" — every report closes with 2–4 actionable recommendations, each grounded in a theme from the data. Raw mentions without interpretation are not a deliverable.

Comments

Markdown supported