C
cloudkit-code-review
About cloudkit-code-review
A review skill for Apple CloudKit code, with checklists and references for containers, records, subscriptions, and sharing. It requires evidence and surrounding-code checks before reporting findings.
Key features
- 01Check account status, zones, and entitlements
- 02Review error handling and conflict merges
- 03Assess batch operations and asset storage
- 04Inspect subscriptions and sharing setup
- 05Report issues with file and line
- 06Verify evidence in staged review gates
Use cases
- 01Review CloudKit database and zone setup
- 02Check record sync, errors, and conflicts
- 03Validate push subscriptions and sharing
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ existential-birds/ beagle --skill cloudkit-code-reviewAfter installing, type/cloudkit-code-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled files
References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.
references/container-setup.mdrecords.mdsharing.mdsubscriptions.mdDetails
From the project READMECloudKit Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| CKContainer, databases, zones, entitlements | references/container-setup.md |
| CKRecord, references, assets, batch operations | references/records.md |
| CKSubscription, push notifications, silent sync | references/subscriptions.md |
| CKShare, participants, permissions, acceptance | references/sharing.md |
Review Checklist
- Account status checked before private/shared database operations
- Custom zones used (not default zone) for production data
- All CloudKit errors handled with
retryAfterSecondsrespected -
serverRecordChangedconflicts handled with proper merge logic -
CKErrorPartialFailureparsed for individual record errors - Batch operations used (
CKModifyRecordsOperation) not individual saves - Large binary data stored as
CKAsset(records have 1MB limit) - Record keys type-safe (enums) not string literals
- UI updates dispatched to main thread from callbacks
-
CKAccountChangedNotificationobserved for account switches - Subscriptions have unique IDs to prevent duplicates
- CKShare uses custom zone (sharing requires custom zones)
When to Load References
- Reviewing container/database setup or zones -> container-setup.md
- Reviewing record CRUD or relationships -> records.md
- Reviewing push notifications or sync triggers -> subscriptions.md
- Reviewing sharing or collaboration features -> sharing.md
Output Format
Report issues using: [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Examples:
[AppDelegate.swift:24] CKContainer not in custom zone[SyncManager.swift:156] Unhandled CKErrorPartialFailure[DataStore.swift:89] Missing retryAfterSeconds backoff
Review Questions
- What happens when the user is signed out of iCloud?
- Does error handling respect rate limiting (
retryAfterSeconds)? - Are conflicts resolved or does data get overwritten silently?
- Is the schema deployed to production before App Store release?
- Are shared records in custom zones (required for CKShare)?
Hard gates (before reporting)
Complete in order for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.
- Location artifact — The finding includes
[FILE:LINE](or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo. - Scope read — You read the full surrounding unit: the type or function that owns the CloudKit work (for example the
CKOperationsubclass usage, completion handler chain, orCKRecordlifecycle), not only a diff hunk or isolated snippet. - CloudKit or deployment claim (only if the finding depends on container identifiers, public vs private database choice, custom zone requirement, iCloud account state, entitlements, or production schema) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example
com.apple.developer.icloud-container-environmentor container ID in the entitlements file,CKContainer.default()vs custom identifier in source,Info.plist/ target capability, or evidence that schema is deployed) or you downgrade the item to an open question in Review Questions. - Protocol — Pre-report steps in review-verification-protocol are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).
Use the issue format [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.
Comments
Markdown supported