About code-review
A code-review skill containing guidelines for reviewing changes in Sentry projects. It helps reviewers assess correctness, performance, security, tests, design fit, and long-term risks with actionable feedback.
Key features
- 01Checks for runtime and performance issues
- 02Flags compatibility and side-effect risks
- 03Reviews ORM queries and security concerns
- 04Assesses design and test coverage
- 05Guidance for constructive feedback and approvals
Use cases
- 01Reviewing a Sentry project pull request
- 02Checking Django ORM changes for query risks
- 03Finding security issues in proposed code
- 04Assessing tests and architectural impact
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ davila7/ claude-code-templates --skill code-reviewAfter installing, type/code-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMESentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
Review Checklist
Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
- ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
Feedback Guidelines
Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
Common Patterns to Flag
Python/Django
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
TypeScript/React
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
Security
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])
References
Comments
Markdown supported