mcpField
C
code-review

code-review

github.com/getsentryTesting & quality1.1k5.5k installsUpdated 5d ago
Repository

About code-review

A code-review skill for Sentry projects that helps reviewers assess correctness, security, performance, design, test coverage, and long-term impact. It emphasizes actionable, considerate feedback and risk-based approvals.

Key features

  1. 01Check runtime errors and performance risks
  2. 02Review side effects and API compatibility
  3. 03Identify security vulnerabilities
  4. 04Assess design and project conventions
  5. 05Evaluate tests and edge cases
  6. 06Flag changes needing senior review

Use cases

  1. 01Review a Sentry pull request for defects
  2. 02Assess security and performance risks in changes
  3. 03Check test coverage and compatibility impact

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/skills --skill code-review

After installing, type/code-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Sentry Code Review

Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.

Review Checklist

Identifying Problems

Look for these issues in code changes:

  • Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
  • Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
  • Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
  • Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
  • ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
  • Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
Design Assessment
  • Do component interactions make logical sense?
  • Does the change align with existing project architecture?
  • Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
Test Coverage

Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:

  • Functional tests for business logic
  • Integration tests for component interactions
  • End-to-end tests for critical user paths

Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.

Long-Term Impact

Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:

  • Database schema modifications
  • API contract changes
  • New framework or library adoption
  • Performance-critical code paths
  • Security-sensitive functionality

Feedback Guidelines

Tone
  • Be polite and empathetic
  • Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
  • Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
Approval
  • Approve when only minor issues remain
  • Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
  • Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code

Common Patterns to Flag

Python/Django
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
    print(user.profile.name)  # Separate query per user

# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
TypeScript/React
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, []);  // userId not in deps

// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
Security
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])

References

Comments

Markdown supported