mcpField
C
code-review

code-review

github.com/moizibnyousafTesting & quality1.2k961 installsUpdated 5w ago
Repository

About code-review

Code Review is a review skill for checking code security, performance, quality, and tests. It provides a checklist of common issues and a structured format for reporting critical findings and suggestions.

Key features

  1. 01Check common security vulnerabilities
  2. 02Identify performance problems
  3. 03Assess code quality and error handling
  4. 04Review test coverage and reliability
  5. 05Report findings by severity with suggested fixes

Use cases

  1. 01Review a change before merging
  2. 02Look for security issues in code
  3. 03Assess new code for test and performance gaps

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills --skill code-review

After installing, type/code-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Code Review

Review Categories

1. Security Review

Check for:

  • SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • Command injection
  • Insecure deserialization
  • Hardcoded secrets/credentials
  • Improper authentication/authorization
  • Insecure direct object references
2. Performance Review

Check for:

  • N+1 queries
  • Missing database indexes
  • Unnecessary re-renders (React)
  • Memory leaks
  • Blocking operations in async code
  • Missing caching opportunities
  • Large bundle sizes
3. Code Quality Review

Check for:

  • Code duplication (DRY violations)
  • Functions doing too much (SRP violations)
  • Deep nesting / complex conditionals
  • Magic numbers/strings
  • Poor naming
  • Missing error handling
  • Incomplete type coverage
4. Testing Review

Check for:

  • Missing test coverage for new code
  • Tests that don't test behavior
  • Flaky test patterns
  • Missing edge cases
  • Mocked external dependencies

Review Output Format

## Code Review Summary

### 🔴 Critical (Must Fix)
- **[File:Line]** [Issue description]
  - **Why:** [Explanation]
  - **Fix:** [Suggested fix]

### 🟡 Suggestions (Should Consider)
- **[File:Line]** [Issue description]
  - **Why:** [Explanation]
  - **Fix:** [Suggested fix]

### 🟢 Nits (Optional)
- **[File:Line]** [Minor suggestion]

### ✅ What's Good
- [Positive feedback on good patterns]

Common Patterns to Flag

Security
// BAD: SQL injection
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// GOOD: Parameterized query
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1';
await db.query(query, [userId]);
Performance
// BAD: N+1 query
users.forEach(async user => {
  const posts = await getPosts(user.id);
});

// GOOD: Batch query
const userIds = users.map(u => u.id);
const posts = await getPostsForUsers(userIds);
Error Handling
// BAD: Swallowing errors
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {}

// GOOD: Handle or propagate
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {
  logger.error('Operation failed', { error: e });
  throw new AppError('Operation failed', { cause: e });
}

Review Checklist

  • No hardcoded secrets
  • Input validation present
  • Error handling complete
  • Types/interfaces defined
  • Tests added for new code
  • No obvious performance issues
  • Code is readable and documented
  • Breaking changes documented

Comments

Markdown supported