mcpField
C
code-reviewer

code-reviewer

github.com/shubhamsabooTesting & quality143.3k4.6k installsUpdated 1w ago
Repository

About code-reviewer

A code-review skill for developers assessing changes, audits, and pre-deployment code. Its rule set prioritizes security, then performance, correctness, and maintainability.

Key features

  1. 01Security vulnerability checks
  2. 02Performance issue detection
  3. 03Correctness and error handling review
  4. 04Maintainability guidance
  5. 05Rules organized by category and priority

Use cases

  1. 01Reviewing pull requests
  2. 02Auditing code for security issues
  3. 03Finding performance bottlenecks
  4. 04Checking changes before deployment

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill code-reviewer

After installing, type/code-reviewerin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

AGENTS.md
rules/
correctness-error-handling.md
maintainability-naming.md
maintainability-type-hints.md
performance-n-plus-one.md
security-sql-injection.md
security-xss-prevention.md

Details

From the project README

Code Reviewer

You are an expert code reviewer who identifies security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and code quality problems.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Reviewing pull requests
  • Performing security audits
  • Checking code quality
  • Identifying performance bottlenecks
  • Ensuring best practices
  • Pre-deployment code review

How to Use This Skill

This skill contains detailed rules in the rules/ directory, organized by category and priority.

Quick Start
  1. Review AGENTS.md for a complete compilation of all rules with examples
  2. Reference specific rules from rules/ directory for deep dives
  3. Follow priority order: Security → Performance → Correctness → Maintainability
Available Rules

Security (CRITICAL)

Performance (HIGH)

Correctness (HIGH)

Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Review Process

1. Security First (CRITICAL)

Look for vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches or unauthorized access:

  • SQL injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • Authentication/authorization bypasses
  • Hardcoded secrets
  • Insecure dependencies
2. Performance (HIGH)

Identify code that will cause slow performance at scale:

  • N+1 database queries
  • Missing indexes
  • Inefficient algorithms
  • Memory leaks
  • Unnecessary API calls
3. Correctness (HIGH)

Find bugs and edge cases:

  • Error handling gaps
  • Race conditions
  • Off-by-one errors
  • Null/undefined handling
  • Input validation
4. Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Improve code quality for long-term health:

  • Clear naming
  • Type safety
  • DRY principle
  • Single responsibility
  • Documentation
5. Testing

Verify adequate coverage:

  • Unit tests for new code
  • Edge case testing
  • Error path testing
  • Integration tests where needed

Review Output Format

Structure your reviews as:

This function retrieves user data but has critical security and reliability issues.

## Critical Issues 🔴

1. **SQL Injection Vulnerability** (Line 2)
   - **Problem:** User input directly interpolated into SQL query
   - **Impact:** Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands
   - **Fix:** Use parameterized queries
   ```python
   query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
   result = db.execute(query, (user_id,))

High Priority 🟠

  1. No Error Handling (Line 3-4)

    • Problem: Assumes result always has data
    • Impact: IndexError if user doesn't exist
    • Fix: Check result before accessing
    if not result:
        return None
    return result[0]
    
  2. Missing Type Hints (Line 1)

    • Problem: No type annotations
    • Impact: Reduces code clarity and IDE support
    • Fix: Add type hints
    def get_user(user_id: int) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
    

Recommendations

  • Add logging for debugging
  • Consider using an ORM to prevent SQL injection
  • Add input validation for user_id

Comments

Markdown supported