mcpField
C
competitive-strategist

competitive-strategist

github.com/ncklrsMarketing & growth53154 installsUpdated 35w ago
Repository

About competitive-strategist

Competitive Strategist is a skill for organizing competitive research, market analysis, positioning, and sales enablement. Its guidance covers win/loss analysis, battlecards, messaging, and monitoring while emphasizing customer needs and evidence-based comparisons.

Key features

  1. 01Guidance for competitive research and analysis
  2. 02Win/loss and market landscape frameworks
  3. 03Battlecard creation and maintenance
  4. 04Positioning and objection-handling guidance
  5. 05Competitive monitoring and sales enablement

Use cases

  1. 01Preparing battlecards for primary competitors
  2. 02Reviewing wins and losses to identify differentiators
  3. 03Developing responses to competitor objections

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist

After installing, type/competitive-strategistin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

rules/
_sections.md
analysis-win-loss.md
battlecard-creation.md
comparison-feature-strategy.md
enablement-sales-training.md
landscape-mapping.md
messaging-competitive-claims.md
messaging-objection-handling.md
monitoring-systems.md
positioning-differentiation.md
research-methodologies.md

Details

From the project README

Competitive Strategist

Expert competitive intelligence and positioning guidance for winning in crowded markets — from research methodologies to sales enablement and everything in between.

Philosophy

Competitive strategy isn't about copying competitors or tearing them down:

  1. Know yourself first — You can't position against others until you know your own strengths
  2. Focus on customers, not competitors — What they need matters more than what rivals do
  3. Be honest — Lies and FUD destroy credibility faster than any competitor
  4. Stay current — Markets move fast; stale intel costs deals

How This Skill Works

When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:

  • research-* — Competitive research methodologies and intelligence gathering
  • analysis-* — Win/loss analysis and market landscape mapping
  • battlecard-* — Battlecard creation, structure, and maintenance
  • positioning-* — Positioning against alternatives and differentiation
  • messaging-* — Competitive messaging and objection handling
  • enablement-* — Sales enablement for competitive situations
  • monitoring-* — Competitive monitoring systems and alerts

Core Frameworks

The Competitive Intelligence Cycle
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐             │
│   │  GATHER  │───▶│ ANALYZE  │───▶│  SHARE   │             │
│   │  (Intel) │    │ (Insight)│    │ (Enable) │             │
│   └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘             │
│        ▲                                │                   │
│        │          ┌──────────┐          │                   │
│        └──────────│  UPDATE  │◀─────────┘                   │
│                   │ (Iterate)│                              │
│                   └──────────┘                              │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Competitive Positioning Matrix
Positioning TypeWhen to UseKey Approach
Head-to-headYou're stronger on key dimensionsDirect comparison
Niche downCompetitor owns general categoryOwn a specific segment
ReframeCompetitor's strength is irrelevantChange the criteria
LeapfrogNew capability they can't matchFuture-oriented vision
CoexistDifferent jobs to be doneComplement, don't compete
Competitor Tiers
TierDescriptionMonitoring FrequencyDepth of Analysis
PrimaryDirect competitors, same ICPWeeklyDeep battlecards
SecondaryAdjacent solutions, partial overlapMonthlyOverview cards
EmergingStartups, potential disruptorsQuarterlyWatch list
AlternativesStatus quo, DIY, spreadsheetsOngoingPain point mapping
Win/Loss Analysis Framework
Deal Outcome
    │
    ├── Won Against Competitor
    │   ├── What differentiated us?
    │   ├── What did they say about competitor?
    │   └── What would have changed their mind?
    │
    └── Lost to Competitor
        ├── What was the deciding factor?
        ├── Where did we fall short?
        └── What could we have done differently?
The Battlecard Structure
SectionPurposeUpdate Frequency
OverviewQuick context, what they doQuarterly
PositioningHow we win, key differentiatorsMonthly
LandminesQuestions to ask that expose weaknessesAs discovered
Objection HandlingResponses to "Why not [competitor]?"As encountered
Proof PointsCustomer quotes, case studiesAs available
Pricing IntelKnown pricing, packagingAs discovered

Competitive Response Spectrum

SituationResponseExample
They launch feature you haveEmphasize experience, depth"We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned"
They launch feature you don'tRoadmap or reframe"We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more"
They cut priceHold on value"You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison"
They spread FUDCorrect with facts"That's not accurate — here's the truth with proof"
They announce fundingIgnore or pivot to stability"We've been profitable since 2019"

Intelligence Sources (Ranked by Value)

  1. Win/loss interviews — First-party, high signal
  2. Sales call recordings — Real objections, real context
  3. Customer feedback — Why they chose you (and considered others)
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Volume of sentiment data
  5. LinkedIn activity — Hiring, messaging, customer posts
  6. Job postings — Strategic direction signals
  7. Press/funding news — Major moves, positioning shifts
  8. Product trials — Hands-on intel (respect ToS)

Anti-Patterns

  • FUD tactics — Spreading fear, uncertainty, doubt backfires
  • Obsessing over competitors — Customer needs > competitor moves
  • Stale battlecards — Outdated intel loses deals
  • One-size-fits-all — Different competitors need different strategies
  • Ignoring the real competitor — Often it's "do nothing" or spreadsheets
  • Attacking instead of differentiating — Negative selling repels buyers
  • Hoarding intel — Unshared intelligence is worthless
  • Copying competitors — You become undifferentiated

Comments

Markdown supported