About content-scoring
content-scoring is a skill for evaluating content for GEO optimization. It scores ten criteria and calls for evidence-based feedback with prioritized improvements.
Key features
- 01Ten GEO criteria scored from 0 to 10
- 02Overall score calculated from criterion scores
- 03Evidence drawn from the evaluated content
- 04Improvements prioritized by potential impact
Use cases
- 01Assessing a page's GEO readiness
- 02Identifying content weaknesses to address
- 03Comparing performance across ten criteria
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/After installing, type/content-scoringin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMEContent Scoring Skill
When scoring content for GEO optimization:
The 10 GEO Criteria
Score each criterion 0-10:
| # | Criterion | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranking Emphasis | "best", "top", "#1", superlatives, leadership claims |
| 2 | User Intent | Direct answers, addresses specific needs, solves problems |
| 3 | Competitive Diff | Unique advantages, "unlike others", differentiators |
| 4 | Social Proof | Stats, testimonials, reviews, customer counts, ratings |
| 5 | Narrative | Engaging flow, persuasive language, compelling story |
| 6 | Authority | Expert tone, credentials, specific knowledge, confidence |
| 7 | USPs | Clear unique value, what makes it special |
| 8 | Urgency | Time limits, scarcity, "now", limited availability |
| 9 | Scannable | Headers, bullets, short paragraphs, clear structure |
| 10 | Factual | Verifiable claims, specific numbers, accurate info |
Scoring Guide
- 0-2: Missing or severely lacking
- 3-4: Present but weak
- 5-6: Adequate, room for improvement
- 7-8: Good, minor improvements possible
- 9-10: Excellent, near optimal
Output Format
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📊 GEO CONTENT SCORE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ OVERALL SCORE: XX/100 │
│ ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ XX% │
│ │
│ BREAKDOWN │
│ ───────── │
│ 1. Ranking Emphasis ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 2. User Intent ██████████ 10/10 │
│ 3. Competitive Diff ████░░░░░░ 4/10 │
│ 4. Social Proof ██░░░░░░░░ 2/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 5. Narrative ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 6. Authority ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 7. USPs ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 8. Urgency ░░░░░░░░░░ 0/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 9. Scannable ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 10. Factual ██████████ 10/10 │
│ │
│ TOP PRIORITIES │
│ ────────────── │
│ 1. Add social proof (+15-20 points potential) │
│ 2. Add urgency signals (+5-10 points potential) │
│ 3. Strengthen competitive differentiation (+8 points) │
│ │
│ EVIDENCE │
│ ──────── │
│ ✓ Good: "industry-leading solution" (ranking emphasis) │
│ ✗ Missing: No customer testimonials (social proof) │
│ ✗ Missing: No time-sensitive offers (urgency) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Rules
- Always show evidence from the actual content
- Prioritize improvements by potential impact
- Be specific about what's missing and how to fix it
- Calculate total score as sum of all criteria
Comments
Markdown supported