mcpField
C
crafting-effective-readmes

crafting-effective-readmes

github.com/whincDocuments4098 installsUpdated 6d ago
Repository

About crafting-effective-readmes

A README-writing skill for project maintainers and developers, structured around audience needs and whether a document is being created, extended, updated, or reviewed.

Key features

  1. 01Audience-focused README planning
  2. 02Task-specific question prompts
  3. 03Project-type guidance
  4. 04Essential section checklist
  5. 05Links to style and reference guides

Use cases

  1. 01Drafting a README for a new project
  2. 02Documenting a new feature or section
  3. 03Refreshing stale project documentation

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/whinc/super-skills --skill crafting-effective-readmes

After installing, type/crafting-effective-readmesin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

README.md
section-checklist.md
style-guide.md
using-references.md
references/
art-of-readme.md
make-a-readme.md
standard-readme-example-maximal.md
standard-readme-example-minimal.md
standard-readme-spec.md
templates/
internal.md
oss.md
personal.md
xdg-config.md

Details

From the project README

Crafting Effective READMEs

Overview

READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.

Always ask: Who will read this, and what do they need to know?

Process

Step 1: Identify the Task

Ask: "What README task are you working on?"

TaskWhen
CreatingNew project, no README yet
AddingNeed to document something new
UpdatingCapabilities changed, content is stale
ReviewingChecking if README is still accurate
Step 2: Task-Specific Questions

Creating initial README:

  1. What type of project? (see Project Types below)
  2. What problem does this solve in one sentence?
  3. What's the quickest path to "it works"?
  4. Anything notable to highlight?

Adding a section:

  1. What needs documenting?
  2. Where should it go in the existing structure?
  3. Who needs this info most?

Updating existing content:

  1. What changed?
  2. Read current README, identify stale sections
  3. Propose specific edits

Reviewing/refreshing:

  1. Read current README
  2. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
  3. Flag outdated sections
  4. Update "Last reviewed" date if present
Step 3: Always Ask

After drafting, ask: "Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"

Project Types

TypeAudienceKey SectionsTemplate
Open SourceContributors, users worldwideInstall, Usage, Contributing, Licensetemplates/oss.md
PersonalFuture you, portfolio viewersWhat it does, Tech stack, Learningstemplates/personal.md
InternalTeammates, new hiresSetup, Architecture, Runbookstemplates/internal.md
ConfigFuture you (confused)What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchastemplates/xdg-config.md

Ask the user if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.

Essential Sections (All Types)

Every README needs at minimum:

  1. Name - Self-explanatory title
  2. Description - What + why in 1-2 sentences
  3. Usage - How to use it (examples help)

References

  • section-checklist.md - Which sections to include by project type
  • style-guide.md - Common README mistakes and prose guidance
  • using-references.md - Guide to deeper reference materials

Comments

Markdown supported