mcpField
C
creation-feasibility-gate

creation-feasibility-gate

github.com/oimiragieoAgent workflows4457 installsUpdated 17w ago
Repository

About creation-feasibility-gate

A preflight skill for deciding whether creating a new agent, skill, workflow, hook, template, or schema is feasible. It requires duplicate checks and file-level evidence, then returns PASS, WARN, or BLOCK with next steps.

Key features

  1. 01Duplicate and existence checks
  2. 02Stack and integration preflight
  3. 03Security boundary checks
  4. 04PASS, WARN, or BLOCK decisions
  5. 05Evidence and remediation steps

Use cases

  1. 01Checking a proposed new skill
  2. 02Assessing workflow creation readiness
  3. 03Identifying blockers before artifact creation

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill creation-feasibility-gate

After installing, type/creation-feasibility-gatein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

commands/
creation-feasibility-gate.md
hooks/
post-execute.cjs
pre-execute.cjs
references/
research-requirements.md
rules/
creation-feasibility-gate.md
schemas/
input.schema.json
output.schema.json
scripts/
main.cjs
templates/
implementation-template.md

Details

From the project README

Creation Feasibility Gate

Overview

Run a fast preflight feasibility check before creating a new agent/skill/workflow/hook/template/schema. This prevents low-value or impossible creator runs.

When to Use

  • Phase 0.5 dynamic creation flow
  • User asks for net-new capability
  • Reflection/evolution recommends artifact creation

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER create artifacts inside this skill — return PASS/WARN/BLOCK with evidence only; all actual creation happens in the appropriate creator skill downstream.
  2. ALWAYS run the existence/duplication check first — never proceed toward PASS if a functionally identical artifact already exists in any catalog or registry.
  3. ALWAYS include concrete file-level evidence for every decision — a bare PASS or BLOCK without referencing specific paths or catalog entries is a spec violation.
  4. NEVER let WARN silently become PASS — every WARN must list exact caveats that the calling agent must acknowledge before creation proceeds.
  5. ALWAYS resolve BLOCK status with actionable next steps and recommended target agents — a BLOCK without remediation tasks is an incomplete gate decision.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Returning PASS without running the duplication checkCreates duplicate artifacts that split agent traffic and inflate catalogsAlways query catalog + registry + filesystem before PASS
Returning BLOCK without remediation tasksCalling agent stalls with no path forwardInclude nextActions with specific agents/skills to unblock
Skipping the security/creator boundary checkCreator paths may be blocked by governance hooks; silently bypassing them causes runtime failuresAlways verify creator skill chain is reachable before PASS
Treating WARN as informational onlyWARN caveats are not surfaced to the user; creation proceeds with unresolved risksWARN must be acknowledged explicitly by the caller in its task metadata
Running creation steps inside the gate skillViolates separation of concerns; gate outputs can't be validated independentlyGate outputs only the decision JSON; delegate creation to creator skills

Workflow

Step 1: Resolve Target
  • Identify proposed artifact type and name
  • Identify expected runtime/tool dependencies
  • Identify expected owner agents
Step 2: Existence/Duplication Check (Iron Law #2)

Use the shared duplicate detection library:

const { checkDuplicate } = require('.claude/lib/creation/duplicate-detector.cjs');
const result = checkDuplicate({
  artifactType: artifactType, // from Step 1 classification
  name: proposedName,
  description: proposedDescription,
});

if (result.decision === 'EXACT_MATCH') {
  return {
    gate: 'BLOCK',
    reason: `Artifact exists at ${result.matchedPath}. Use the ${artifactType}-updater skill instead.`,
  };
}
if (result.decision === 'REGISTRY_MATCH') {
  return {
    gate: 'WARN',
    reason: `"${proposedName}" found in ${result.message} but file may be missing. Investigate.`,
  };
}
if (result.decision === 'SIMILAR_FOUND') {
  return {
    gate: 'WARN',
    reason: `Similar artifacts found: ${result.candidates.map(c => `${c.name} (${(c.score * 100).toFixed(0)}%)`).join(', ')}. Confirm creation is intentional.`,
  };
}
return { gate: 'PASS' };

The 3 detection layers (filesystem, registry/catalog, fuzzy/semantic) are handled internally by the library. See .claude/lib/creation/duplicate-detector.cjs for details.

Step 2.5: Additional Preflight Checks

Run these checks with concrete evidence:

  1. Stack compatibility check
    • Required tooling/runtime present in current project conventions
  2. Integration readiness check
    • Can it be routed/discovered/assigned after creation?
  3. Security/creator boundary check
    • Ensure creator path and governance can be satisfied
Step 3: Decision

Return one status:

  • PASS: creation is feasible now
  • WARN: feasible with clear caveats
  • BLOCK: not feasible; must resolve blockers first

Use this output shape:

{
  "status": "PASS|WARN|BLOCK",
  "artifactType": "agent|skill|workflow|hook|template|schema",
  "artifactName": "example-name",
  "evidence": ["..."],
  "blockers": [],
  "nextActions": ["..."]
}

Output Protocol

If BLOCK, include concrete remediation tasks and recommended target agents. If PASS or WARN, include exact creator skill chain to run next.

Memory Protocol

Record feasibility patterns and recurring blockers to .claude/context/memory/learnings.md.

Comments

Markdown supported