mcpField
C
cursor-agent

cursor-agent

github.com/veselyAgent workflows2865 installsUpdated 7w ago
Repository

About cursor-agent

cursor-agent is a skill for delegating a task to Cursor’s headless CLI agent and returning its response with a brief Claude summary. It supports model and mode hints, with review-specific prompt guidance.

Key features

  1. 01Headless task delegation to cursor-agent
  2. 02Model and mode hint parsing
  3. 03Review prompt enrichment
  4. 04Verbatim response with Claude TL;DR

Use cases

  1. 01Get a second opinion on code reviews
  2. 02Critique an implementation plan
  3. 03Review text or copy
  4. 04Ask general questions

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/vesely/skills --skill cursor-agent

After installing, type/cursor-agentin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesREADME.md

Details

From the project README

Cursor Agent

Delegate a task to Cursor's headless CLI agent (cursor-agent). Use this to get a second opinion from a non-Claude model on code reviews, plan critiques, text/copy review, or general Q&A.

Inputs

  • $task: The task to hand to cursor-agent. Usually a review or question prompt. If the user adds a model hint (e.g. "with Opus", "using GPT", "pomocí Sonnetu"), extract it and pass via --model.

Goal

Run cursor-agent headless, surface its output to the user, and add a brief Claude TL;DR so the user doesn't have to re-read a wall of text.

Steps

1. Parse the task

Extract from $task and the surrounding conversation:

  • Model hint — look for phrasing like:
    • "Opus" / "claude" → --model claude-opus-4-7-medium
    • "Sonnet" → --model claude-4.6-sonnet-medium
    • "GPT" / "GPT-5" / "Codex" → --model gpt-5.3-codex
    • "Gemini" → --model gemini-3.1-pro
    • "Auto" → --model auto
    • Nothing mentioned → omit --model (cursor uses its default: composer-2-fast)
  • Mode hint:
    • "plan" / "plan mode" / "navrhni" → --mode plan
    • "write" / "edit" / "implement" / "headless" → omit --mode (cursor can write)
    • Otherwise → --mode ask (read-only, default)
  • Is this a review? If the task mentions "review", "check", "verify", "second opinion", or references a branch/PR/diff, enrich the prompt (step 2).

Success criteria: Flags decided, prompt ready.

2. Enrich the prompt (reviews only)

If the task is a code review:

  • Identify the diff scope. Try in order: explicit reference in the task (PR number, branch name), current branch vs main (git diff origin/main...HEAD), or uncommitted changes (git diff HEAD).
  • Prepend a short instruction to the prompt so cursor-agent knows what to look at:

    "Review the branch <name> against main. Use git diff origin/main...HEAD to see the actual changes. Focus on real issues (correctness, edge cases, security); skip nitpicks. Report under ~400 words with file:line references."

For non-review tasks (ask/plan/text/UI), pass the task as-is.

Success criteria: Final prompt string ready for the CLI.

3. Run cursor-agent

Invoke headless via Bash:

cursor-agent -p --output-format text [--mode <mode>] [--model <model>] "<prompt>"
  • Always use -p (print/headless).
  • Always use --output-format text unless the task needs structured output.
  • Workspace defaults to pwd — don't pass --workspace unless the user explicitly asked for a different dir.
  • For runs with only non-write modes (--mode ask or --mode plan), no extra permission flags are needed. For headless write mode, do not silently add --force or --yolo; ask the user first.
  • Pipe to tail -n 200 if you suspect a very long response and want to cap context use. By default, take the full output.

Success criteria: cursor-agent returns (exit 0) with a response. If it errors (auth, model not available), surface the error to the user instead of hiding it.

4. Return the output

Present to the user in this order:

  1. Cursor's verbatim response — quote it directly so the user hears the other model's voice, including file:line references.
  2. Your short TL;DR — 3–6 bullets at most, separated by a horizontal rule. Highlight what's real vs. noise, and suggest concrete next actions. Do not silently filter cursor's findings; if you disagree with one, call it out explicitly.

Keep the summary tight — the goal is to save the user from re-reading, not to replace cursor's output.

Success criteria: User sees both cursor's raw output and a Claude-curated action list.

Notes

  • cursor-agent --list-models shows every available model ID. If the user asks for something exotic (e.g. "thinking tier", "max tier"), check the list first.
  • cursor-agent reads/writes inside the current workspace like any CLI tool — it is not sandboxed by default. Treat its output the same way you'd treat a teammate's PR comment: trust but verify.
  • This skill is for one-shot delegation. For a longer back-and-forth, the user can run cursor-agent interactively themselves (no -p).

Comments

Markdown supported