mcpField
D
design-rationale

design-rationale

github.com/dragoon0xDesign & UI675 installsUpdated 35w ago
Repository

About design-rationale

design-rationale is a conversation skill for explaining design decisions with a structured argument. It ties choices to user behavior or business goals and prepares for objections, tradeoffs, and fallback positions.

Key features

  1. 01Structure rationale in four parts
  2. 02Connect choices to user or business goals
  3. 03Anticipate likely objections
  4. 04Explain tradeoffs and prepare a fallback
  5. 05Avoid appeals to authority or aesthetics

Use cases

  1. 01Explain why a design option was chosen
  2. 02Address team objections to a design tradeoff
  3. 03Prepare an alternative position for a design decision

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/dragoon0x/taste-skills --skill design-rationale

After installing, type/design-rationalein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Design Rationale

Convince the room with structure, not feelings.

How to use

  • /design-rationale Apply rationale constraints to defend design decisions in this conversation.

Constraints

Rationale Structure
  • MUST include all four elements in one paragraph:
    1. What you chose
    2. What you didn't choose (and why)
    3. What principle guided the decision
    4. What outcome you expect
  • MUST connect to user behavior or business goals, not aesthetic preference
  • NEVER defend a design decision with "it feels right" or "it looks better"
Anticipate Objections
  • MUST address the most likely pushback before it's raised
  • SHOULD acknowledge what's lost by this choice (the tradeoff)
  • MUST have a fallback position if the primary argument doesn't land
Anti-Patterns
  • Defending decisions by appealing to authority ("Apple does it this way")
  • Using data as a shield without explaining the logic ("our A/B test showed...")
  • Getting defensive when challenged instead of engaging with the objection
  • Over-explaining simple decisions (not every choice needs a thesis)

Comments

Markdown supported