mcpField
D
docs-feedback-triage

docs-feedback-triage

github.com/lvtd-llcDocuments142 installsUpdated 7w ago
Repository

About docs-feedback-triage

A skill for agents handling feedback on developer documentation. It helps assess validity, actionability, and user impact so teams can prioritize work and route issues to documentation, product, or support owners.

Key features

  1. 01Classify feedback and its source
  2. 02Assess validity and actionability
  3. 03Prioritize by user impact
  4. 04Route docs, product, or support issues
  5. 05Plan follow-up and evidence collection

Use cases

  1. 01Triage comments on developer docs
  2. 02Separate documentation defects from product issues
  3. 03Decide which feedback merits a fix or follow-up

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/lvtd-llc/skills --skill docs-feedback-triage

After installing, type/docs-feedback-triagein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

guidelines.md
references/core/
knowledge.md
workflows/
triage-doc-feedback.md

Details

From the project README

Docs Feedback Triage

Use this skill to turn developer documentation feedback into valid, actionable, prioritized work. It helps agents avoid treating every comment as equal while preserving user evidence.

This skill is derived from Docs for Developers: An Engineer's Field Guide to Technical Writing, especially Chapter 8, "Gathering and integrating feedback." It is expanded with paraphrased guidance from Christopher Gales and the Splunk Documentation Team's The Product Is Docs: Writing Technical Documentation in a Product Development Group, especially Chapter 5, "Customer Feedback and Community," Chapter 18, "Working with Customer Support," and Chapter 20, "Working with the Field." Do not copy book prose into user outputs. Source: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842-7217-6

Quick Start

  1. Load guidelines.md to choose the smallest useful reference set.
  2. Identify feedback source, affected doc, user impact, response need, and whether the issue is docs-owned.
  3. Test validity, actionability, and importance before recommending work.
  4. Use workflows/triage-doc-feedback.md for a full triage pass.
  5. Close the loop with users or source teams when the feedback changes product, support, or docs work.

Default Output

When triaging feedback, return:

  1. Feedback summary - source, affected doc, user type, and reported problem.
  2. Classification - valid/invalid/needs research, docs/product/support issue, duplicate status.
  3. Actionability - reproducible, scoped, and fixable information.
  4. Priority - severity and rationale.
  5. Recommended action - doc fix, routing, follow-up, or no action.
  6. Follow-up - user response, owner, and evidence to collect.

Contents

NeedStart Here
Understand feedback channelsreferences/core/knowledge.md
Apply triage rulesreferences/core/knowledge.md
See triage examplesreferences/core/knowledge.md
Triage feedbackworkflows/triage-doc-feedback.md
Route by taskguidelines.md

Core Posture

  • Feedback is evidence, not a direct order.
  • Distinguish docs problems from product, support, pricing, or policy problems.
  • Prioritize by user impact and fixability.
  • Treat public/community feedback as both support signal and trust-building opportunity.
  • Follow up when users took time to report a real issue.

Comments

Markdown supported