mcpField
D
domain-model-boundaries-mapper

domain-model-boundaries-mapper

github.com/patricio0312revDevelopment63258 installsUpdated 41w ago
Repository

About domain-model-boundaries-mapper

A development skill for mapping domain boundaries and ownership with Domain-Driven Design, intended for teams planning or refactoring systems. It organizes relationships through context maps, dependencies, interface contracts, and migration recommendations.

Key features

  1. 01Identify bounded contexts and core domains
  2. 02Map context and dependency relationships
  3. 03Define interface contracts and events
  4. 04Design anti-corruption layers and refactoring recommendations
  5. 05Plan phased migration strategies

Use cases

  1. 01Map domain boundaries in existing code
  2. 02Reduce tight coupling between services
  3. 03Separate shared models and oversized services
  4. 04Plan context decoupling and service extraction

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skills --skill domain-model-boundaries-mapper

After installing, type/domain-model-boundaries-mapperin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Domain Model & Boundaries Mapper

Map domain boundaries and ownership using Domain-Driven Design.

Domain Map Template

# Domain Map: E-Commerce Platform

## Bounded Contexts

### 1. Customer Management

**Core Domain:** User accounts, profiles, preferences
**Owner:** Customer Team
**Ubiquitous Language:**

- Customer: Registered user with account
- Profile: Customer personal information
- Preferences: User settings and choices

**Entities:**

- Customer (id, email, name)
- Address (id, customer_id, street, city)
- PaymentMethod (id, customer_id, type, token)

**Bounded Context Diagram:**

┌─────────────────────────────┐ │ Customer Management │ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │Customer │ │ Address │ │ │ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ │ │ ┌─────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Payment Method │ │ │ └─────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────┘


### 2. Order Management
**Core Domain:** Order processing, fulfillment
**Owner:** Orders Team
**Ubiquitous Language:**
- Order: Purchase request with line items
- LineItem: Product quantity in order
- Fulfillment: Physical delivery of order

**Entities:**
- Order (id, customer_id, status, total)
- LineItem (id, order_id, product_id, quantity)
- Shipment (id, order_id, tracking_number)

### 3. Product Catalog
**Core Domain:** Product information, inventory
**Owner:** Catalog Team
**Ubiquitous Language:**
- Product: Sellable item
- SKU: Stock keeping unit
- Inventory: Available stock

**Entities:**
- Product (id, name, price, description)
- Inventory (sku, quantity, warehouse_id)

## Context Relationships

Customer Management ──────▶ Order Management (customer_id)

Product Catalog ──────▶ Order Management (product_id)

Order Management ──────▶ Fulfillment (order events)


## Anti-Corruption Layers

### Order Management → Customer Management
**Problem:** Orders need customer data but shouldn't depend on Customer domain model

**Solution:** Customer Adapter
```typescript
// Order domain's view of customer
interface CustomerForOrder {
  id: string;
  shippingAddress: Address;
  billingAddress: Address;
}

// Adapter translates Customer domain to Order domain
class CustomerAdapter {
  async getCustomerForOrder(customerId: string): Promise<CustomerForOrder> {
    const customer = await customerService.getCustomer(customerId);
    return {
      id: customer.id,
      shippingAddress: this.toOrderAddress(customer.defaultShippingAddress),
      billingAddress: this.toOrderAddress(customer.defaultBillingAddress),
    };
  }
}

Dependency Map

┌──────────────┐
│   Customer   │
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐      ┌────────────┐
│    Orders    │─────▶│  Products  │
└──────┬───────┘      └────────────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐
│ Fulfillment  │
└──────────────┘

Dependency Rules:

  • Customer has no dependencies
  • Orders depends on Customer (read) and Products (read)
  • Fulfillment depends on Orders (events)

Interface Contracts

Customer Management → Orders
// Public interface exposed by Customer domain
interface CustomerService {
  getCustomer(id: string): Promise<Customer>;
  getCustomerAddresses(id: string): Promise<Address[]>;
}

// Events published
interface CustomerUpdated {
  customerId: string;
  email: string;
  name: string;
}
Product Catalog → Orders
interface ProductService {
  getProduct(id: string): Promise<Product>;
  checkAvailability(sku: string, quantity: number): Promise<boolean>;
  reserveInventory(items: ReservationRequest[]): Promise<Reservation>;
}

Refactor Recommendations

Problem 1: Tight Coupling

Current: Orders directly queries Customer database Issue: Breaks bounded context, creates coupling Recommendation: Use Customer API instead

// ❌ Before: Direct database access
const customer = await db.customers.findById(customerId);

// ✅ After: API call through adapter
const customer = await customerAdapter.getCustomerForOrder(customerId);
Problem 2: Shared Models

Current: Same User model used across contexts Issue: Changes in one context affect others Recommendation: Separate models per context

// Customer context
interface Customer {
  id: string;
  email: string;
  profile: CustomerProfile;
  preferences: CustomerPreferences;
}

// Order context (different model!)
interface OrderCustomer {
  id: string;
  shippingAddress: Address;
  billingAddress: Address;
}
Problem 3: God Service

Current: OrderService handles orders, inventory, payments, shipping Issue: Single service owns too much Recommendation: Extract bounded contexts

  • OrderService: Order lifecycle
  • InventoryService: Stock management
  • PaymentService: Payment processing
  • FulfillmentService: Shipping

Strategic Design Patterns

Pattern 1: Shared Kernel

When: Two contexts must share some code Example: Common value objects (Money, Address)

// Shared kernel (minimal!)
class Money {
  constructor(public amount: number, public currency: string) {}
}
Pattern 2: Customer/Supplier

When: One context depends on another Example: Orders (customer) depends on Products (supplier)

  • Supplier defines interface
  • Customer adapts to their needs
Pattern 3: Published Language

When: Many contexts need same data Example: Product events

interface ProductCreated {
  productId: string;
  name: string;
  price: Money;
  publishedAt: Date;
}

Migration Strategy

Phase 1: Identify Boundaries
  • Map existing code to domains
  • Identify coupling points
  • Document dependencies
Phase 2: Define Interfaces
  • Design APIs between contexts
  • Create adapter layers
  • Define event contracts
Phase 3: Decouple
  • Replace direct DB access with APIs
  • Introduce anti-corruption layers
  • Separate models per context
Phase 4: Extract Services (optional)
  • Move contexts to separate services
  • Implement API gateways
  • Set up event bus

Best Practices

  1. Ubiquitous language: Same terms in code and domain
  2. Bounded contexts: Clear boundaries, separate models
  3. Context maps: Document relationships
  4. Anti-corruption layers: Protect domain integrity
  5. Event-driven: Loose coupling via events
  6. Separate databases: Context owns its data

Output Checklist

  • Bounded contexts identified (3-7)
  • Core domain vs supporting domains
  • Ubiquitous language defined per context
  • Entity/aggregate definitions
  • Context relationship diagram
  • Dependency map
  • Interface contracts defined
  • Anti-corruption layers designed
  • Refactor recommendations
  • Migration strategy

Comments

Markdown supported