About domain-modeling
domain-modeling is an active design skill for conversations that change a project's domain model. It challenges terminology with concrete scenarios and records settled terms and important decisions in repository documents.
Key features
- 01Challenge terms against the project glossary
- 02Clarify vague or overloaded language
- 03Probe relationships with edge-case scenarios
- 04Check stated behavior against code
- 05Update glossary entries as terms resolve
- 06Offer ADRs for consequential trade-offs
Use cases
- 01Designing or changing a domain model
- 02Reviewing model behavior against implementation
- 03Recording resolved terminology during design
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ anorth/ agent-skills --skill domain-modelingAfter installing, type/domain-modelingin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled filesGLOSSARY-FORMAT.mdADR-FORMAT.md
Details
From the project READMEDomain Modeling
Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design.
This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios,
and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise.
(Merely reading GLOSSARY.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do.
This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)
It applies in any conversation where the model changes: designing, building, or reviewing.
File structure
If the project already keeps its glossary or ADRs somewhere else or under another name
(for example CONTEXT.md, or as its AGENTS.md describes), use those. Otherwise, use this layout:
/
├── GLOSSARY.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
Create files lazily: only when you have something to write.
If no GLOSSARY.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved.
If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in GLOSSARY.md, call it out immediately.
"Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Cross-reference with code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"
Update GLOSSARY.md inline
When a term is resolved, update GLOSSARY.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen.
Use the format in GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md.
GLOSSARY.md should be totally devoid of implementation details.
Do not treat GLOSSARY.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions.
It is a glossary and nothing else.
Offer ADRs sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
- Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
- The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.
Keep it current
When a conversation changes something already recorded, fix the record in the same change:
- A term's meaning shifts → update its entry.
- A decision is reversed or replaced → write a new ADR, and mark the old one
superseded by ADR-NNNN. Don't rewrite the old one. - An ADR has drifted in a small factual way (a renamed module, a moved file) → correct it in place.