mcpField
E
elixir-docs-review

elixir-docs-review

github.com/existential-birdsTesting & quality8588 installsUpdated 11w ago
Repository

About elixir-docs-review

A review skill for assessing Elixir documentation, specifications, and doctests. It provides checklists, context-sensitive rules, and evidence gates for reviewing public APIs.

Key features

  1. 01Module and function documentation checks
  2. 02Public API specification coverage
  3. 03Doctest suitability and execution checks
  4. 04Cross-reference and metadata checks
  5. 05Evidence-based review gates

Use cases

  1. 01Reviewing documentation on public Elixir modules
  2. 02Checking exported functions for @doc and @spec
  3. 03Assessing doctest coverage for pure functions

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill elixir-docs-review

After installing, type/elixir-docs-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/doc-quality.mdreferences/spec-coverage.md

Details

From the project README

Elixir Documentation Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
@moduledoc, @doc quality, anti-patternsreferences/doc-quality.md
@spec, @type, @typedoc coveragereferences/spec-coverage.md

Review Checklist

Module Documentation
  • All public modules have @moduledoc
  • First-line summary is concise (one line, used by tools as summary)
  • @moduledoc includes ## Examples where appropriate
  • @moduledoc false only on internal/implementation modules
Function Documentation
  • All public functions have @doc
  • All public functions have @spec
  • @doc describes return values clearly
  • Multi-clause functions documented before first clause
  • Function head declared when arg names need clarification
Doctests
  • Doctests present for pure, deterministic functions
  • No doctests for side-effectful operations (DB, HTTP, etc.)
  • Doctests actually run (module included in test file)
Cross-References
  • Module references use backtick auto-linking (MyModule)
  • Function refs use proper arity format (function/2)
  • Type refs use t: prefix (t:typename/0)
  • No plain-text references where auto-links are possible
Metadata
  • @since annotations on new public API additions
  • @deprecated with migration guidance where appropriate

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • @doc false on callback implementations - Documented at behaviour level
  • @doc false on protocol implementations - Protocol docs cover the intent
  • Missing @spec on private functions - @spec optional for internals
  • Short @moduledoc without ## Examples on simple utility modules - Not every module needs examples
  • Using @impl true without separate @doc - Inherits documentation from behaviour

Context-Sensitive Rules

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing @moduledocModule is public AND not a protocol impl
Missing @specFunction is public AND exported
Missing doctestsFunction is pure AND deterministic
Generic @docDoc restates function name without adding value

Gates (sequenced — do not skip)

Work in order. Do not draft or ship a finding until the prior step passes.

  1. Scope lock — Pass when: You listed the exact .ex/.exs file paths (or Module names) under review; no vague “the project” scope.
  2. Full-context read — Pass when: For each candidate issue, you read the full surrounding definition (all clauses for multi-clause functions; full @moduledoc block for module-level claims), not only a diff hunk or search snippet.
  3. Evidence bundle — Pass when: Every draft finding uses the [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE header (line range allowed) and includes a verbatim quote or pointer to the @doc / @spec / doctest text in question. Module.function/arity may appear as supporting context but does not replace the [FILE:LINE] anchor. For “doctest fails” claims, Pass when: you cite mix test output for the relevant file or line, or the exact error string.
  4. Protocol before report — Pass when: You loaded and followed review-verification-protocol (its Pre-Report checklist) before finalizing the issue list—not after.

When to Load References

  • Reviewing @moduledoc or @doc quality, seeing anti-patterns -> doc-quality.md
  • Reviewing @spec, @type, or @typedoc coverage -> spec-coverage.md

Comments

Markdown supported