About enterprise-security-exception-review
A skill for reviewing enterprise security exceptions, customer requirements, compensating controls, and remediation. It produces a decision artifact with evidence, approval ownership, expiry, and customer communication.
Key features
- 01Exception type classification
- 02Control gap and risk review
- 03Compensating control planning
- 04Approval, evidence, and expiry definition
- 05Remediation and customer response planning
Use cases
- 01Assess a customer-specific security requirement
- 02Review a proposed risk acceptance
- 03Set expiry and remediation for an exception
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ sylphxai/ skills --skill enterprise-security-exception-reviewAfter installing, type/enterprise-security-exception-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled filesagents/openai.yamlreferences/enterprise-security-exception-patterns.md
Details
From the project READMEEnterprise Security Exception Review
Use this skill to convert enterprise security exception, compensating control, customer requirement, risk acceptance, expiry, and remediation questions into a concrete artifact with owners, gates, metrics, and recovery paths.
Workflow
- Identify customer request, control requirement, current standard, gap, affected data, contract impact, compensating controls, owner, expiry need, and remediation feasibility.
- Read
references/enterprise-security-exception-patterns.md. - Classify exception as no-exception-needed, documentation gap, customer-specific config, compensating control, risk acceptance, roadmap request, contract redline, or non-acceptable risk.
- Define approval owner, evidence, compensating control, customer communication, expiry, renewal review, remediation plan, and support/runbook impact.
- Produce exception review, state machine, decision table, event schema, risk checklist, and customer response plan.
When not to use
- Do not use for generic advice the base model already handles without this skill's specific artifact contract.
Guardrails
- Do not grant indefinite customer-specific security exceptions without owner, expiry, and renewal review.
- Do not let sales promise security controls, certifications, encryption, residency, logging, SSO, or retention exceptions without evidence.
- Do not accept exceptions that silently weaken other customers, shared infrastructure, or regulatory commitments.
- Do not confuse roadmap intent with currently operating compensating controls.
Output format
Security exception context:
Audience / source of truth / risk boundary:
Exception decision plan:
| Area | Decision | Evidence | Risk | Owner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Compensating controls, expiry, and remediation:
- <trigger> -> <policy, metric, edge case, support note>
Comments
Markdown supported