About feature-prompt
feature-prompt is a skill for turning free-form feature requests into a concise handoff prompt for grill-with-field. It emphasizes identifying scope and open decisions before drafting, and defines a contract for saving and reviewing the prompt.
Key features
- 01Infers context from intake and repository evidence
- 02Applies a fog test before drafting
- 03Limits prompts to a reviewable work slice
- 04Defines a six-section prompt contract
- 05Specifies approval and save checks
Use cases
- 01Preparing a focused request for grill-with-field
- 02Splitting broad work into an initial slice
- 03Capturing unresolved decisions as questions
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ devarfeen/ agent-skills-kit --skill feature-promptAfter installing, type/feature-promptin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled files
References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.
agents/openai.yamlevals/audit-behavior-cases.mdevals.jsonREADME.mdrubric.mdtest-cases.mdreferences/context-terms.mdDetails
From the project READMEfeature-prompt
Produces the smallest useful handoff for the next step — not an implementation
spec. grill-with-field will challenge the plan, sharpen domain terms, update
GLOSSARY.md, and offer ADRs only for hard decisions.
Output contract
Final prompts use this shape:
Project:
[Full Project Matrix code, repo, path, or context. Use one line.]
What is needed:
[The change to make. One short paragraph or 2-4 bullets.]
Why it is needed:
[The problem, user pain, business reason, or workflow gap — so grill-with-field
can challenge tradeoffs, not just wording — and what happens if nothing is
built.]
Expected end result:
[Observable done state. Prefer user-visible behavior, passing checks, or a
demo flow; seeds the later acceptance criteria. Name the empty, loading,
error, and recovery behavior, each role that sees it, and one thing that must
not happen.]
Known limits:
[Hard constraints, non-goals, compatibility needs, or exclusions
already known. When intake was split, list the deferred slices as explicit
non-goals. Always include the zero-attribution rule.]
Open questions:
[Conditional. Real unresolved questions for grill-with-field to attack.]
The first five sections are always present; omit Open questions when none remain.
Rules
Zero attribution: never add or leave co-author, AI, or tool attribution in any output. Include this rule in the prompt's Known limits.
Intake and inference
- Start from free-form intake. Infer first; ask only when
What is neededis unclear or project/context cannot be inferred safely. - Use repo evidence when cheap: Project Matrix, cwd,
GLOSSARY.md,GLOSSARY-MAP.md, and ADR names. Do not run a broad code scan by default.
Scope and slicing
- Before drafting, apply the fog test: can you state the destination in one
line and name every open decision as a sharp question, right now? If not,
stop and suggest
/wayfinder— it charts those decisions and resolves them one per session. Do not write a PR-sized prompt for foggy work. Fog, not size, is the test: a large mechanical change with nothing left to decide is not fog. - Default to one thin vertical slice, small enough to review and merge
independently. Broad intake gets split: draft this prompt for slice 1 only;
Known limitsrecords the deferred slices. A prompt that would force a very long grilling session → ask to split scope before finalizing; user away → split it yourself and note the split at the top of the response. - When the user intends parallel agent threads, split slices to minimize shared-file coupling.
Context and evidence
- Use the full Project Matrix code verbatim whenever one exists. Never abbreviate project codes or invent shorthand.
- Reference existing files/modules/seams. Put "reuse existing seam vs create
new seam" under
Open questionsonly while unresolved; otherwise record the settled choice and its evidence in the contract section that names the seam, never as a new section. If search finds no existing seam, name the terms searched. - Include only non-obvious context: constraints, architecture quirks, and domain rules the model cannot infer cheaply from repo scans. Omit stack facts the code already shows.
- Dependency internals central and unclear → suggest fetching targeted source
(e.g.
opensrc) as a follow-up context step before deep grilling. - Keep domain words intact. Ground candidate definitions in evidence and use
the approval flow below; unresolved definitions belong to
grill-with-field.
Questions and output discipline
- Do not create
Domain terms,Decisions,Dependents,Risks,Doc anchors,Integration,Constraints, orAcceptancesections. Fold useful facts into the six contract sections; user-stated hard decisions go underKnown limits. - All unclear decisions land under
Open questions; ungrillable ones ("needs to feel/see it") also route to/handoff+/prototypebefore deep grilling continues. - Keep
Open questionsto the highest-leverage unknowns (usually 1-5). Drop trivia that can be decided during implementation. - A vague answer to a sharp question ("as fast as possible", "all users") is
not an answer — ask once for a number or a named segment; still vague →
park it under
Open questionsas written. - Do not implement the feature, create a spec, or edit ADRs.
GLOSSARY.mdchanges happen only through the approved candidate-terms flow below. - Keep the final prompt spartan, direct, plain English — it is a generated artifact, never compressed shorthand.
Candidate context terms
Only when cheap repo evidence or user-requested exploration reveals domain
terms missing from or stale in GLOSSARY.md — never run extra exploration just
to fill this. The shared flow — what qualifies, presentation, the
away-fallback, applying approvals — lives in
references/context-terms.md. Show candidates
before finalizing the prompt, apply only approved updates, and report the
edited path before saving. Terms still needing review stay under
Open questions.
Agent use
Sub-agents: dispatch local lanes automatically for independent work — never cloud agents; announce the lane count at dispatch and report each lane as it completes. Lanes are for fast, independent context checks only — no worker agents, no code edits.
Final output
- Draft the final prompt.
- For non-trivial or inferred prompts, show it once for correction, listing inferred facts (project, slice boundary, end result) separately from what the user stated. User away → save as drafted and note at the top that it is unconfirmed.
- If candidate context terms were found, run the shared approval flow.
- Verify the pre-save checklist and save to the path below, then re-open the saved file and confirm sections and path match the approved draft, or the explicitly unconfirmed draft when the user is away, before reporting.
- Add only:
Context updated: <relative GLOSSARY.md path> [only if edited]
Saved to: <relative path written>
Next: pass this final prompt to the `grill-with-field` skill.
Suggested next skills (optional):
- /grill-with-field: challenge assumptions, sharpen domain terms, and confirm decisions.
- /handoff + /prototype: when open questions are ungrillable and need a higher-fidelity spike.
- /to-spec: if this needs a formal spec (PRD) after grilling.
File output
Path
<artifacts-root>/specs/prompts/NNNN-<feature-slug>-prompt.md
Resolve <artifacts-root>: the *.code-workspace directory if one exists, else the per-context root (GLOSSARY-MAP.md at repo root; legacy CONTEXT-MAP.md), else the repo root.
NNNN— scan<artifacts-root>/specs/adr/andspecs/prompts/for the highest existing four-digit number and increment. This avoids numbers occupied when the prompt is created. ADRs have an independent sequence and may later reuse a prompt number; the recorded prompt path is the link.<feature-slug>— kebab-case fromWhat is needed, max 4 words, ASCII.-prompt— fixed suffix marking the artifact type.
Conflict handling
- Create
specs/prompts/lazily. Never overwrite a number already used by another artifact. Never delete unrelated files. - A prior same-slug prompt counts as hand-edited when git shows commits or working-tree changes to it that this session didn't make; if git can't tell (untracked file), assume hand-edited.
- A same-slug prompt created in this session and unchanged since → update in place. Hand-edited → show the diff and ask: overwrite, new numbered revision, or abort. If the user is away, write a new numbered revision — never overwrite hand edits unconfirmed.
File body
Write exactly the final prompt body — no preface, no generated-by header —
drop-in usable as input to grill-with-field.
Pre-save checklist
- Only the six allowed section headers appear, in contract order
-
Project:names the full Project Matrix code verbatim (when one exists) - For a new file,
NNNNunique acrossspecs/adr/andspecs/prompts/; an in-place update retains its own number; slug ≤ 4 words, kebab-case ASCII,-promptsuffix - Split intake: deferred slices recorded under
Known limits; the zero-attribution rule is present - No placeholder text (
TBD,TODO,[...]) remains, and no two sections contradict each other - File body is the prompt only — drop-in, no preface