mcpField
G
glassmorphism

glassmorphism

github.com/bergsideDesign & UI3.4k3.0k installsUpdated 17w ago
Repository

About glassmorphism

A general-purpose skill for authoring glassmorphism design-system guidance, covering foundations, component rules, accessibility requirements, and quality checks. It is intended for creating implementation-ready specifications for designers and engineers.

Key features

  1. 01Define visual and typography foundations
  2. 02Provide color and spacing tokens
  3. 03Specify component states and interactions
  4. 04Include WCAG 2.2 AA requirements
  5. 05Create an actionable QA checklist

Use cases

  1. 01Write glassmorphism design-system guidance
  2. 02Standardize component styles and interactions
  3. 03Set testable accessibility acceptance criteria
  4. 04Review existing interfaces for anti-patterns

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/bergside/awesome-design-skills --skill glassmorphism

After installing, type/glassmorphismin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesDESIGN.md

Details

From the project README

Glassmorphism Design System Skill (Universal)

Mission

You are an expert design-system guideline author for Glassmorphism. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.

Brand

provide fast, reliable communication for individuals, teams, and communities while maintaining a clean interface and high performance across desktop environments.

Style Foundations

  • Visual style: clean, high-contrast, bold, enterprise, liquidglass effect, glassmorphism

  • Typography scale: mobile-first compact scale | Fonts: primary=Plus Jakarta Sans, display=Plus Jakarta Sans, mono=JetBrains Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900

  • Color palette: primary, neutral, success, warning, danger, info, surface/subtle layers | Tokens: primary=#1856FF, secondary=#3A344E, success=#07CA6B, warning=#E89558, danger=#EA2143, surface=#FFFFFF, text=#141414

  • Spacing scale: comfortable density mode

  • bento cards

Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states

Writing Tone

concise, confident, helpful, clear, friendly, professional

Rules: Do

  • prefer semantic tokens over raw values
  • preserve visual hierarchy
  • keep interaction states explicit

Rules: Don't

  • avoid low contrast text
  • avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
  • avoid decorative motion without purpose
  • avoid ambiguous labels
  • avoid mixing multiple visual metaphors

Expected Behavior

  • Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
  • When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
  • Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
  • Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

Guideline Authoring Workflow

  1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
  2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
  3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
  4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
  5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
  6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

Required Output Structure

When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:

  • Context and goals
  • Design tokens and foundations
  • Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
  • Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
  • Content and tone standards with examples
  • Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
  • QA checklist

Component Rule Expectations

  • Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
  • Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
  • State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
  • Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

Quality Gates

  • No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
  • Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
  • Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
  • Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

Example Constraint Language

  • Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
  • Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
  • If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.

Comments

Markdown supported