mcpField
G
go-generics

go-generics

github.com/cxuuDevelopment1861.0k installsUpdated 19w ago
Repository

About go-generics

A Go generics skill for developers deciding when and how to use type parameters. It emphasizes starting with concrete code and generalizing only when shared logic warrants it.

Key features

  1. 01Guidance on choosing generics or interfaces
  2. 02Constraint composition with unions and underlying types
  3. 03Type parameter naming conventions
  4. 04Common pitfalls and standard constraints

Use cases

  1. 01Deciding whether repeated logic merits generics
  2. 02Designing constraints for reusable Go functions
  3. 03Reviewing generic code for unnecessary complexity

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-generics

After installing, type/go-genericsin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/CONSTRAINTS.md

Details

From the project README

Go Generics and Type Parameters

Compatibility: Generics require Go 1.18+.

Resource Routing

  • references/CONSTRAINTS.md - Read when composing constraints, using type sets, or choosing between generics and interfaces.

When to Use Generics

Start with concrete types. Generalize only when a second type appears.

Prefer Generics When
  • Multiple types share identical logic (sorting, filtering, map/reduce)
  • You would otherwise rely on any and excessive type switching
  • You are building a reusable data structure (concurrent-safe set, ordered map)
Avoid Generics When
  • Only one type is being instantiated in practice
  • Interfaces already model the shared behavior cleanly
  • The generic code is harder to read than the type-specific alternative

"Write code, don't design types." — Robert Griesemer and Ian Lance Taylor

Decision Flow
Do multiple types share identical logic?
├─ No  → Use concrete types
├─ Yes → Do they share a useful interface?
│        ├─ Yes → Use an interface
│        └─ No  → Use generics

Bad:

// Premature generics: only ever called with int
func Sum[T constraints.Integer | constraints.Float](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Good:

func SumInts(vals []int) int {
    var total int
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Type Parameter Naming

NameTypical Use
TGeneral type parameter
KMap key type
VMap value type
EElement/item type

For complex constraints, a short descriptive name is acceptable:

func Marshal[Opts encoding.MarshalOptions](v any, opts Opts) ([]byte, error)

Type Aliases vs Type Definitions

Type aliases (type Old = new.Name) are rare — use only for package migration or gradual API refactoring.


Constraint Composition

Combine constraints with ~ (underlying type) and | (union):

type Numeric interface {
    ~int | ~int8 | ~int16 | ~int32 | ~int64 |
    ~float32 | ~float64
}

func Sum[T Numeric](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Use the constraints package or cmp package (Go 1.21+) for standard constraints like cmp.Ordered instead of writing your own.


Common Pitfalls

Don't Wrap Standard Library Types
// Bad: generic wrapper adds complexity without value
type Set[T comparable] struct {
    m map[T]struct{}
}

// Better: use map[T]struct{} directly when the usage is simple
seen := map[string]struct{}{}

Generics justify their complexity when they eliminate duplication across multiple call sites. A single-use generic is just indirection.

Don't Use Generics for Interface Satisfaction
// Bad: T is only used to satisfy an interface — just use the interface
func Process[T io.Reader](r T) error { ... }

// Good: accept the interface directly
func Process(r io.Reader) error { ... }
Avoid Over-Constraining
// Bad: constraint is more restrictive than needed
func Contains[T interface{ ~int | ~string }](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

// Good: comparable is sufficient
func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

Quick Reference

TopicGuidance
When to use genericsOnly when multiple types share identical logic and interfaces don't suffice
Starting pointWrite concrete code first; generalize later
NamingSingle uppercase letter (T, K, V, E)
Type aliasesSame type, alternate name; use only for migration
Constraint compositionUse ~ for underlying types, `
Common pitfallDon't genericize single-use code or when interfaces suffice

Related Skills

  • Interfaces vs generics: See go-interfaces when deciding whether an interface already models the shared behavior without generics
  • Type declarations: See go-declarations when defining new types, type aliases, or choosing between type definitions and aliases
  • Documenting generic APIs: See go-documentation when writing doc comments and runnable examples for generic functions
  • Naming type parameters: See go-naming when choosing names for type parameters or constraint interfaces

Comments

Markdown supported