About groove-work-spec
groove-work-spec is a skill for producing implementation-ready specifications from a topic. It guides an agent through codebase research and user decisions, then structures the spec around choices, steps, and edge cases.
Key features
- 01Codebase research before drafting
- 02User interview on scope and decisions
- 03Parent and child spec planning
- 04Structured implementation and verification criteria
Use cases
- 01Planning a feature against an existing codebase
- 02Splitting work into sequential or independent specs
- 03Recording technical choices and edge cases
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ andreadellacorte/ groove --skill groove-work-specAfter installing, type/groove-work-specin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMEgroove-work-spec
Use $ARGUMENTS as the spec topic if provided.
Outcome
A complete outcome spec that defines what to build and how to verify it — the agent determines the procedure.
Acceptance Criteria
Spec file contains:
- Overview: What to build and why
- Decisions: Key technical choices with rationale
- Implementation Steps: Concrete, ordered steps
- Edge Cases: Error handling, boundary conditions
Constraints
- Sanitize topic for use as filename — strip path separators, special characters, and traversal patterns (
../) - Specs directory is always
.groove/memory/specs/ - Ensure the specs directory exists (create if missing)
- Research codebase first (use Explore agent)
- Interview user for decisions, edge cases, testing approach, scope
- Assess scope: if the work has natural seams (independent components, sequential phases, separable concerns), recommend splitting into a parent spec with child specs
- Parent spec: Overview of the full feature, links to child specs, execution order if sequential
- Child specs: Each self-contained with its own Overview, Decisions, Steps, Edge Cases
- Naming:
<topic>.mdfor single specs,<topic>/index.md+<topic>/01-<part>.mdfor split specs - User decides: Present the split recommendation with rationale, user confirms or overrides
- Write spec in isolated context (use general-purpose agent)
- Verify all required sections exist before completing
- Reference actual codebase patterns, not generic advice
Quality Signals
- Decisions reference real code patterns
- Steps include actual file paths and function names
- Edge cases reflect discovered constraints
Comments
Markdown supported