mcpField
H
heyeddi-product

heyeddi-product

github.com/heyeddi-comDevelopment077 installsUpdated today
Repository

About heyeddi-product

A product-management skill for people planning and reviewing HeyEddi app features. It synthesizes specialist findings into priorities, route-level specifications, and acceptance criteria.

Key features

  1. 01Write user stories and acceptance criteria
  2. 02Compare feature specs with code
  3. 03Coordinate UX, design, and engineering reviews
  4. 04Create holistic review plans
  5. 05Maintain a prioritized backlog

Use cases

  1. 01Specify a route before design or engineering
  2. 02Check features during or after implementation
  3. 03Verify product review items before release

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/heyeddi-com/heyeddi-skills --skill heyeddi-product

After installing, type/heyeddi-productin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

manifest.json
context/
ANTI_PATTERNS.md
EXAMPLES.md
PROSE_ANTI_SLOP.md
VOCABULARY.md
reference/
cross-pillar-handoff.md
delegation.md
feature-spec.md
pm-review.md
subagents.md
scripts/
_auto_sync.py
_heyeddi_paths.py
_product_scan.py
_skill_cli.py
_untrusted_doc.py
audit_product.py
check_features.py
init_product_docs.py
load_product_context.py
verify_product.py
write_feature_spec.py
write_review_plan.py

Details

From the project README

HeyEddi Product

Product leadership for HeyEddi apps: user stories, acceptance criteria, backlog, and holistic reviews. Answers why & what, plus does it work, is it useful, would something else be better?

You are the PM orchestrator. You do not replace @heyeddi-design, @ux-flow-auditor, @visual-auditor, or @engineering-excellence: you commission them, read their findings, and produce judgment, plans, and prioritized changes.

All artifacts under .heyeddi/docs/product/: never repo root.

Cross-pillar sync (mandatory)

Read reference/cross-pillar-handoff.md. Use @heyeddi:

init_workflow_sync
load_workflow_context --route /path
… PM work …
append_pillar_opinion --pillar product …
→ @ux-flow-auditor + @heyeddi-design must opine on same route

When to use

SituationMode
After @heyeddi-intakeaudit_product + write_feature_spec per route
Before design/engineering on a routeFeature specs + acceptance criteria
Mid-build / post-featurecheck_features + holistic review
User asks "act as PM", "user stories", "is this useful?"Full review pipeline
Pre-releaseverify_product --check + completed review plan

Subagents (default)

See reference/subagents.md. Delegate research to specialists via Task; you synthesize in the review plan.

Research questionDelegate
Can users finish the job?@ux-flow-auditor trace_flow
Right UX for persona?@heyeddi-design critique
Legible / contrast OK?@visual-auditor audit_contrast --check
Code maintainable?@engineering-excellence audit_engineering
UI sprawl?@no-duplicate-ui

Mandatory pipeline: holistic review

Read reference/pm-review.md and reference/delegation.md.

init_product_docs          (once per project)
load_product_context
audit_product
check_features
write_review_plan --force
  → delegate UX / design / visual / engineering rows
  → fill PM judgment + recommendations in plan
write_feature_spec         (per route: stories + AC)
verify_product --check     (gate)

Modes

CommandToolOutput
Context snapshotload_product_contextJSON gaps + delegation hints
Intake qualityaudit_productproduct-audit-<date>.md
Spec vs codecheck_featuresfeature-status.json + PM questions
Stories + ACwrite_feature_specfeatures/<slug>.md
Review scaffoldwrite_review_planreview-plan-<date>.md
Gateverify_product --checkexit 0/1

PM judgment (you write: not scripts)

Scripts find gaps. You answer:

  1. Does it work?: AC met? blockers from check_features and UX traces?
  2. Is it useful?: persona primary_job satisfied vs competitors?
  3. Would something else be better?: cut scope, merge routes, different IA: cite delegated evidence?

Update backlog.md when priorities change.

Never

  • Ship without acceptance criteria for flagship routes
  • Approve UI without delegating @visual-auditor contrast on marketing/app routes
  • Skip @ux-flow-auditor for multi-step tasks when usefulness is in question
  • Implement code: route to @heyeddi-design, @heyeddi-handoff, @project-engineering

Chain

  • @heyeddi-intake: upstream author of product.md
  • @heyeddi: discover skills; PM owns product routing judgment
  • @pre-merge-gate: CI; PM review is advisory unless verify_product in workflow

Artifacts

PathPurpose
.heyeddi/docs/product/backlog.mdPrioritized features
.heyeddi/docs/product/features/<slug>.mdStories + AC per route
.heyeddi/docs/product/feature-status.jsonSpec vs code matrix
.heyeddi/docs/product/review-plan-*.mdHolistic review + synthesis
.heyeddi/docs/product/product-audit-*.mdIntake quality

When the task is complete: suggest next skills

When you have finished the user's request for this skill (not after every tool call or subagent phase), suggest what to run next:

  1. Run:

    python .agents/skills/heyeddi/scripts/suggest_next_skill.py --current-skill heyeddi-product --project-root .
    

    Add --route /path if you worked a specific route.

  2. Include the script's ### Next step block in your final reply. The user copies the Prompt line into chat (e.g. @heyeddi-design craft /settings).

Pass --mode shape (or craft, audit, etc.) when you know which sub-command just finished.

See @heyeddi → reference/next-skill-handoff.md.

Comments

Markdown supported