mcpField
I
idea-validator

idea-validator

github.com/shipshitdevMarketing & growth38260 installsUpdated today
Repository

About idea-validator

idea-validator is a structured framework for assessing startup ideas before development. It combines a problem assessment matrix, a Perceived Created Value score, and discovery questions to help founders decide whether an idea needs refinement or merits pursuit.

Key features

  1. 01Rate problem frequency and severity
  2. 02Score perceived created value across four dimensions
  3. 03Use guided customer discovery questions
  4. 04Connect validation with related startup skills

Use cases

  1. 01Assess an idea before committing to development
  2. 02Identify weaknesses in the problem or customer definition
  3. 03Compare a proposed solution with current alternatives
  4. 04Decide whether to refine or pursue a startup idea

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/skills --skill idea-validator

After installing, type/idea-validatorin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesplugin.jsonreferences/full-guide.md

Details

From the project README

Idea Validator - Startup Idea Assessment Framework

Rigorously assess startup ideas BEFORE building using structured validation—saving months of wasted effort on ideas that won't work.

Hexa's Principle: "You want to make something people want. But people don't always know what they want—so you need to understand what they actually need."

When This Activates

  • User asks "is this a good idea"
  • User says "I want to build X" without validation
  • User asks "should I pursue this"
  • User mentions a startup idea they're considering
  • User wants to know if their idea is worth building

The Framework

Validation = Opportunity Memo Assessment + Perceived Created Value (PCV) Score

Problem Assessment Matrix
DimensionRatingImpact
Frequency[Daily/Weekly/Monthly]High/Med/Low
Severity[Critical/Important/Nice-to-have]High/Med/Low
Awareness[Actively seeking/Aware/Unaware]High/Med/Low
Budget[Has budget/Would find/No budget]High/Med/Low

Problem Score: 3-4 High = Strong. 1-2 = Weak. 0 = Not a real problem.

PCV Scoring (4 Dimensions)

Rate current solution problems + your improvement:

DimensionCurrent ProblemYour Improvement
PriceNot a problem / A problem / SeriousNo diff / Some / Serious
QualityNot a problem / A problem / SeriousNo diff / Some / Serious
PerformanceNot a problem / A problem / SeriousNo diff / Some / Serious
ConvenienceNot a problem / A problem / SeriousNo diff / Some / Serious

Scoring: a=0, b=1, c=3 points. Sum all 8 ratings.

ScoreInterpretationRecommendation
0-6WeakDon't pursue
7-12ModerateNeeds refinement
13-18StrongWorth pursuing
19-24ExceptionalBuild NOW

Quick Discovery Questions

Problem Space:

  1. What specific pain point does your ICP feel?
  2. How do they currently solve this?
  3. What's wrong with current solutions?
  4. How often do they experience this pain?
  5. What does this problem cost them?

Timing:

  1. Why is NOW the right time?
  2. What has changed recently?
  3. What barriers existed before that are now gone?

ICP:

  1. Company type, size, industry
  2. Buyer vs. user role
  3. What triggers them to seek a solution?

Integration

SkillWhen to Use
market-sizerAfter validation passes
startup-icp-definerDeep dive on customer
mvp-architectScope the build
leads-researcherFind design partners

For detailed execution workflow, output templates, and PCV calculations: references/full-guide.md

Comments

Markdown supported