mcpField
I
improve-writing

improve-writing

github.com/simonrwProductivity049 installsUpdated 1d ago
Repository

About improve-writing

A writing skill that guides revisions toward formal, neutral, concise, and precise documentation. It provides rules for structure, word choice, emphasis, and consistent terminology.

Key features

  1. 01Formal, neutral writing guidance
  2. 02Concise and active phrasing
  3. 03Structure and list-use rules
  4. 04Consistent terminology
  5. 05Precise technical vocabulary

Use cases

  1. 01Revise technical documentation
  2. 02Improve clarity in project prose
  3. 03Standardize terminology across documents

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/simonrw/skills --skill improve-writing

After installing, type/improve-writingin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Improve Writing

A path to higher quality written output.

Guidance

  • Formal, neutral and professional language: Avoid colorful or figurative language. We are writing docs that are intended to be dry and concise. There is no need to make them exciting. Avoid colloquialisms.
  • Avoid dashes and (semi)colons Use direct and active language that avoids the need for dashes or (semi) colons. Avoid paratactic style, asyndetic construction, parenthetical construction and appositive construction.
  • Colons after list elements If a list item has emphasised 'header' word(s) use a colon afterwards not a period. Take this list as an example.
  • Avoid bullet pointed lists: Only use bullet pointed lists when they actually make sense and you are enumerating elements of a set. Do not use them as a general mechanism to structure text that can also be structured as paragraphs.
  • Use emphasis intentionally: Use emphasis (bold, italic) to guide the reader through the doc. Emphasised text provides the reader with anchors when quickly glancing over a page. They serve an important role in navigation and overview.
  • Plain words first: Use simple words and language unless a specific technical term is more precise and that precision is actually meaningful in the context. E.g. use Send instead of dispatch unless dispatch carries information the simpler verb does not.
  • No decoration: Omit decorative language that does not add relevant meaning. Examples for this are words like orchestration, pipeline, synergy, first-class, platform-grade, etc...
  • Use technical vocabulary precisely, not as flair: Contract, boundary, observer, layer, primitive, interface each carry a specific engineering meaning. Use them only when you mean exactly that. If a plainer word fits, prefer the plainer word.
  • No techno babble: Avoid any cool sounding words just for the purpose of adding color. If a specific term carries meaning that can not be expressed otherwise/in a simple way, use it, but omit otherwise.
  • Stable terms: Once a doc has introduced a name for a thing, do not switch to a synonym later. Either use the defined term or the plainest possible alternative — never a third invented synonym in the same doc.
  • Active voice, entity-first: The subscription emits an event when its plan changes beats An event is emitted by the system upon subscription plan change events. Lead with the thing that acts.
  • No hedging in factual statements: Might, could, generally, typically — if something is uncertain, it belongs in Open Questions or marked as such. If it is fact, state it directly.
  • Sections only where appropriate: Use sections --- only when areas of text are disjoint. Do not use them as a structuring mechanism where simple headers could be used instead.
  • Precision: Precision is of utmost importance. If a concrete name is used, expecially when using it with code decoration (examble) then this name must exactly match the source code. Simplifications are not allowed, becuase if the name changes then it does not identify that concrete element anymore.

Comments

Markdown supported