link-prospect-qualification
About link-prospect-qualification
A skill for turning raw URLs into evidence-backed, prioritized link-building prospect segments. It combines hard reject gates, scoring, and manual page review, then records reasons and next actions.
Key features
- 01Apply hard rejection gates
- 02Score and prioritize prospects
- 03Manually inspect shortlisted pages
- 04Record evidence and rejection reasons
- 05Suggest pitch angles and contact paths
Use cases
- 01Prioritize sites for link outreach
- 02Reject prospects with spam risks
- 03Prepare outreach rationale and contact paths
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ lvtd-llc/ skills --skill link-prospect-qualificationAfter installing, type/link-prospect-qualificationin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled files
References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.
references/core/examples.mdknowledge.mdrules.mdworkflows/qualify-link-prospects.mdDetails
From the project READMELink Prospect Qualification
Use this skill to turn raw prospect URLs into prioritized outreach segments with evidence, scores, rejection reasons, and next actions.
This skill is derived from Garrett French and Eric Ward's Ultimate Guide to Link Building and uses transformed guidance with durable book-topic references. Do not copy book prose into user outputs.
Quick Start
- Use the Contents table below to choose the smallest useful reference set.
- Use
workflows/qualify-link-prospects.mdfor a full qualification pass. - Apply hard reject gates before scoring.
- Use automated signals to triage, then manually inspect shortlisted pages.
- Return priority, standard, nurture, review, and reject buckets with evidence.
Default Output
When asked to qualify prospects, return:
- Summary - reviewed, priority, standard, nurture, manual review, rejected.
- Priority prospects - URL, type, score, fit, qualification reason, pitch angle, contact path.
- Review/nurture prospects - open questions and needed checks.
- Rejected prospects - reject reason and evidence.
- Rubric notes - relevance, trust, authority, editorial quality, spam risk, and asset readiness.
Contents
| Need | Start Here |
|---|---|
| Understand qualification concepts | references/core/knowledge.md |
| Apply scoring rules | references/core/rules.md |
| See scoring examples | references/core/examples.md |
| Run qualification | workflows/qualify-link-prospects.md |
Core Posture
- Metrics triage prospects; human relevance and intent decide.
- Trust comes from people and institutions serving users, not from scores alone.
- Spam risk can override attractive authority metrics.
- A target asset should be internally connected and shareable before outreach.