mcpField
M
mux-work

mux-work

github.com/maddec01Agent workflows116 installsUpdated today
Repository

About mux-work

mux-work is a skill for running a Mux factory issue from intake through shaping and build handoff. It defines routing, issue updates, subagent roles, decision checkpoints, and the information to preserve so work can resume from the issue.

Key features

  1. 01Issue intake and route selection
  2. 02Status updates on the Mux board
  3. 03Subagent-based repository investigation
  4. 04Brief and decision recording
  5. 05Build thread handoff and continuation

Use cases

  1. 01Triage a new factory issue
  2. 02Resolve open product or domain questions
  3. 03Prepare and gate a build brief
  4. 04Resume work across threads

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/maddec01/mux-factory --skill mux-work

After installing, type/mux-workin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

concepts.md
issue-tracker.md
questions.md
retro-capture.md
screenshots.md
agents/
approver.md
builder.md
ci-fixer.md
doubt.md
implementer.md
planner.md
reviewer-code.md
reviewer-security.md
reviewer-ui.md
reviewer-ux.md
scripts/
status.sh

Details

From the project README

You run one Mux factory item. Pedro answers questions, picks prototypes, verifies visible changes and merges every PR; the rest is yours.

Rules

  • Move the issue's Status on the "Mux" board at every step: bash <this skill>/scripts/status.sh <owner/repo#n> "<Status>". Statuses: List, Queued, Shaping, Needs you, Ready, In progress, Review, Verify, Ready to merge, Done.
  • Facts are yours to find; decisions are Pedro's. Read code, docs and history in subagents. Every factory subagent reports in ≤300 words, never whole files, logs or screenshots. Ask Pedro only what a subagent can't answer.
  • Tools: gh issue view <ref> --comments and gh issue comment for issues; t3_thread_launch for threads; delegate_task for a T3 child task; AskUserQuestion for ordinary questions to Pedro, following the question guide. Retro picks and their clarifications stay in chat. Call orchestrator_capabilities only to change a model; never search the tool catalogue.
  • Read each linked file or skill only when its step runs.
  • The issue is the only hand-over: brief, map, decisions and links live in its body and comments, so every step resumes from the issue alone.
  • Past about 150k tokens, hand off: post a handoff written per ~/.agents/skills/handoff/SKILL.md as an issue comment, then continue in a fresh thread with t3_thread_launch.
    • Shaping thread: /mux-work <issue>, root workspace.
    • Build thread: only while work before the PR step remains (slices, merges, a review round); otherwise finish in place (PR, status, retro). Past the mark, start no new implementers; merge the running ones, then hand off with the message from 5. Start the build and workspaceStrategy {"type":"existing_worktree","worktreePath":"<build worktree>","branch":"<build branch>"}. The handoff names the step and review round to resume at; the open slice sub-issues carry the rest. At a review round it also lists each reviewer's verdict, the open findings, and the rejected findings with reasons.
  • Never merge or push to main. Commit and PR rules are in each repo's AGENTS.md.

Grilling with docs

Wherever this skill grills (open questions in 2. Size up, Concepts step 1, decision: grill), load grilling and domain-modeling, as upstream grill-with-docs does. Challenge Pedro's terms against the repo's GLOSSARY.md and ADRs; capture each resolved term and ADR-worthy decision the moment it settles.

Shaping, concept and decision threads run in the repo's main checkout with no branch or PR, writing only to the issue and leaving the checkout as found. So draft each glossary entry and ADR instead of writing it: record it in the batch's answers comment, then in Domain docs of the brief (3. Brief) or the map (Concepts). Drafts follow domain-modeling's GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md and ADR-FORMAT.md; an ADR draft meets its three conditions. The builder writes them to the repo in the build PR.

1. Pick up

Read the issue with comments, parent, sub-issues and blockers, then route:

  • Unfinished retro capture record (first, even over a passing brief): finish only that capture per Retro capture, keeping the source status. Rerun no build or retro; start no shaping or thread. Report links and pending failures, then end this pickup, even if capture completes.
  • A decision: * sub-issue: Decisions.
  • A build sub-issue, or a passing brief in the body: 5. Start the build.
  • Anything else: set Shaping. An Explore subagent reads the repo's AGENTS.md, GLOSSARY.md, relevant ADRs and the code this issue touches, and returns ≤300 words in domain-modeling vocabulary: what exists, where, and what the issue would change.

2. Size up

Pick the route yourself; never ask Pedro to pick one by name. Ask him to confirm it (question UI) in a few lines: what you understood the item to be; the open questions, or "none"; and what happens next in plain words ("I'll ask you three questions, then write the brief"; "a subagent reproduces the bug first; I only ask you if the expected behaviour is unclear"; "this is too big for one session, so I'll turn it into a concept map").

Add the kind label (bug, feature, improvement, concept), first running label setup in the issue's repo if it lacks the label. Anything Pedro adds or corrects is another open question. Then:

  • Bug: first a Diagnose subagent with diagnosing-bugs returns the cause, the evidence and a failing test to write; its open questions join the list.
  • Open questions: settle every one here by Grilling with docs, for bugs and features alike. A question of how something looks or feels gets a Prototype subagent with prototype, in its own worktree on a prototype/<n>-<slug> branch: two or three variants differing only on that question. It keeps its screenshots in its own context and returns each variant's file paths and a short description. Tell Pedro how to open them (T3 browser preview for web; the run scripts in the repo's T3 project for Apple), ask for his pick, and record it and the branch on the issue.
  • No open questions: write the brief.
  • Too big or unclear for one session: Concepts.

3. Brief

Replace the issue body with the brief; Pedro's original text goes in a collapsed <details> block at the end.

## What
<the change, in Pedro's domain language>

## Done when
- <observable result a reviewer can check>

## Confirmed
- <each assumption Pedro confirmed, and each decision with a link>

## Notes for the builder
<where the code is, the failing test to start from, prototype branch to follow>

## Domain docs
- Glossary: <each term to add or change, as a GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md entry>, or "none"
- ADRs: <each ADR to write, as an ADR-FORMAT.md draft>, or "none"

## Verify
<"yes" with why (visible, auth, migrations, deployment, hard to check), or "no">

4. Gate

  1. A Doubt subagent gets only the path of agents/doubt.md, the brief and the repo path, no conversation. Fix what it finds.
  2. In one batch, ask Pedro every assumption he hasn't confirmed and every Doubt finding you can't fix.
  3. Set Ready.

5. Start the build

Launch the build thread with t3_thread_launch in the issue's repo project:

  • workspaceStrategy: {"type":"worktree","baseRef":"main","branch":"<kind>/<n>-<slug>","startFromOrigin":true}, where <kind> is fix, feat or chore;
  • message: Build <owner/repo#n>. Read <this skill>/agents/builder.md and follow it. with this skill's absolute path.

Give Pedro the build thread's link. This shaping thread is done.

Comments

Markdown supported