About performance
A performance optimization reference skill for developers investigating slow or resource-intensive software. It emphasizes profiling before changes and covers caching, database queries, memory management, and measurement workflows.
Key features
- 01Profile-first optimization workflow
- 02Performance budgets and benchmarking
- 03Cache layers and invalidation
- 04Database query optimization
- 05Memory and resource management
Use cases
- 01Finding CPU, memory, or I/O bottlenecks
- 02Reducing repeated database queries
- 03Choosing cache invalidation strategies
- 04Verifying the effect of code changes
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ krzysztofsurdy/ code-virtuoso --skill performanceAfter installing, type/performancein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled files
References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.
references/caching-strategies.mddatabase-optimization.mdprofiling-patterns.mdDetails
From the project READMEPerformance Optimization
Performance work follows one rule: measure before you change anything. Intuition about bottlenecks is wrong more often than right. Every optimization starts with profiling, forms a hypothesis, applies a targeted fix, and ends with another measurement.
Core principles
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Measure first | Never optimize without profiling data. Gut feelings about bottlenecks are unreliable |
| Optimize the critical path | Focus on the code that runs most often or blocks user-visible latency |
| Set budgets | Define acceptable latency, throughput, and resource usage before you start |
| Avoid premature optimization | Write readable, correct code first. Optimize only when measurements show a real problem |
| Know the tradeoffs | Every optimization costs something (memory for speed, complexity for throughput, freshness for latency) |
Profiling and benchmarking
Profiling shows where time and resources go. Without it you are guessing.
Types of profiling
| Type | What it reveals | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| CPU profiling | Hot functions, call frequency, execution time distribution | Slow request handling, high CPU usage |
| Memory profiling | Allocation rates, heap size, object retention, leaks | Growing memory usage, OOM errors, GC pressure |
| I/O profiling | Disk reads/writes, network calls, blocking waits | Slow file operations, external service latency |
| Database profiling | Query execution time, query count per request, slow queries | High DB load, N+1 patterns, missing indexes |
The profiling workflow
- Baseline: capture metrics under normal conditions before any changes
- Identify: find the hotspot using the most time or resources
- Hypothesize: form a specific theory about why it is slow
- Fix: apply a single, targeted change
- Verify: measure again to confirm the improvement and check for regressions
Performance budgets
Define limits that trigger action when exceeded:
- Response time: P50, P95, P99 latency targets per endpoint
- Throughput: Minimum requests per second under expected load
- Resource usage: CPU, memory, and connection limits per service
- Page weight: Maximum transfer size for frontend assets
See Profiling Patterns Reference for profiling workflows, bottleneck signatures, and load testing strategies.
Caching strategies
Caching removes redundant computation and data fetching by storing results closer to where they are needed.
Cache layers
| Layer | Location | Latency | Use case |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 - In-process | Application memory (object cache, memoization) | Nanoseconds | Hot data accessed many times per request |
| L2 - Distributed | Redis, Memcached, shared cache | Sub-millisecond to low milliseconds | Data shared across application instances |
| HTTP cache | Browser, reverse proxy (Varnish, Nginx) | Zero network round-trip for client cache | Static assets, cacheable API responses |
| CDN | Edge servers worldwide | Low latency from geographic proximity | Static files, pre-rendered pages, media |
| Database cache | Query result cache, buffer pool | Varies | Repeated identical queries |
Invalidation approaches
| Strategy | How it works | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| TTL-based | Cache entries expire after a fixed duration | Data that tolerates bounded staleness |
| Event-based | Cache is cleared when the source data changes | Data that must stay fresh after writes |
| Write-through | Writes update both the cache and the backing store at the same time | Read-heavy workloads needing strong consistency |
| Write-behind | Writes update the cache immediately; backing store is updated asynchronously | High write throughput where eventual consistency is acceptable |
Cache stampede prevention
When a popular cache key expires, many concurrent requests may all try to regenerate it at once and overwhelm the backend. Three approaches prevent this:
- Locking: only one request regenerates; others wait or serve stale data
- Probabilistic early recomputation: requests randomly refresh the cache before expiration, spreading regeneration over time
- Request coalescing: duplicate in-flight requests are collapsed into a single backend call
See Caching Strategies Reference for implementation patterns with multi-language examples.
Database optimization
Database queries are the most common performance bottleneck in web applications.
Index strategy
- Create indexes on columns used in WHERE, JOIN, and ORDER BY clauses
- Use composite indexes that match the most frequent query patterns (leftmost prefix rule)
- Covering indexes include all columns a query needs, so no table lookup is required
- Monitor unused indexes, since they slow down writes without helping reads
N+1 query prevention
The N+1 problem occurs when code fetches a list of N records and then runs one more query per record to load related data. Instead of 1 query, it runs N+1.
Detection signals:
- Query count scales linearly with result set size
- Many nearly identical queries differing only in a single parameter
- Profiler shows dozens or hundreds of queries for a single page load
Prevention strategies:
- Eager loading (JOIN or separate batch query upfront)
- Batch loading (collect IDs, fetch all related records in one query)
- DataLoader pattern (batching and deduplication within a request)
Connection pooling
Opening a database connection is expensive (TCP handshake, authentication, TLS negotiation). A connection pool keeps a set of reusable connections:
- Size the pool for expected concurrency: too small causes queueing, too large overwhelms the database
- Return connections to the pool as soon as the work is done, because leaked connections exhaust the pool
- Set idle timeouts to reclaim unused connections
- Use external poolers (like PgBouncer for PostgreSQL) when application-level pooling is not enough
See Database Optimization Reference for query patterns, explain plan analysis, and multi-language examples.
Memory and resource management
Memory optimization patterns
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
| Object pooling | Reuse expensive objects instead of allocating and discarding them |
| Streaming | Process large datasets as streams instead of loading everything into memory |
| Lazy initialization | Defer creation of expensive objects until they are needed |
| Weak references | Hold references that do not prevent garbage collection |
| Buffer reuse | Allocate buffers once and reuse them across operations |
Lazy loading
Lazy loading defers work until the result is needed. It reduces startup time and memory use, but adds complexity and can cause surprise latency later.
Where lazy loading helps:
- Loading related database records only when accessed
- Initializing expensive service connections on first use
- Loading UI components or assets only when they become visible
Where lazy loading hurts:
- When the deferred work always happens anyway (it only adds overhead)
- When it moves latency from a predictable startup phase to unpredictable user interactions
- When it creates N+1 query patterns (see Database Optimization above)
Batch operations
Replace individual operations with batch alternatives where possible:
- Batch inserts instead of inserting one row at a time
- Batch API calls instead of calling an external service N times
- Bulk file operations instead of processing files individually
Quick reference: common bottleneck patterns
| Symptom | Likely cause | First investigation step |
|---|---|---|
| Slow response times, low CPU | I/O waits (database, network, disk) | Profile I/O and check query logs |
| High CPU, normal response times | Inefficient algorithms or excessive computation | CPU profile to find hot functions |
| Growing memory over time | Memory leak (unreleased references, unbounded caches) | Heap dump comparison over time |
| Intermittent slowness under load | Resource contention (locks, connection pool exhaustion) | Check pool sizes and lock wait times |
| Fast locally, slow in production | Network latency, missing caches, different data volumes | Compare profiling data between environments |
Reference Files
| Reference | Contents |
|---|---|
| Caching Strategies | Cache layers, invalidation patterns, stampede prevention, with multi-language examples |
| Database Optimization | Query optimization, N+1 prevention, connection pooling, batch operations, with multi-language examples |
| Profiling Patterns | Profiling workflows, bottleneck signatures, performance budgets, load testing strategies |
Integration with Other Skills
| Situation | Recommended Skill |
|---|---|
| Performance issues caused by poor architecture | clean-architecture |
| Need to refactor slow code paths | refactoring |
| API response time optimization | api-design |
| Database schema and query design | database-design |