mcpField
P
performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns

performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns

github.com/mukul975Security35.2k57 installsUpdated 8w ago
Repository

About performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns

A security skill for rating IT asset criticality to guide vulnerability remediation. It combines business impact, data sensitivity, regulatory scope, exposure, recoverability, and user population into tiers that adjust remediation SLAs.

Key features

  1. 01Score assets using six business and technical factors
  2. 02Assign assets to five criticality tiers
  3. 03Adjust vulnerability remediation SLAs by tier
  4. 04Use data classification and regulatory scope
  5. 05Review scores as systems and roles change

Use cases

  1. 01Prioritize vulnerabilities on high-impact assets
  2. 02Set remediation timelines by asset criticality
  3. 03Align asset ratings with business stakeholders
  4. 04Refresh scores after changes to systems

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns

After installing, type/performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulnsin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

LICENSE
assets/
template.md
references/
api-reference.md
standards.md
workflows.md
scripts/
agent.py
process.py

Details

From the project README

Performing Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns

Overview

Asset criticality scoring assigns a business impact rating to each IT asset so that vulnerability remediation efforts focus on systems with the greatest organizational risk. Without criticality context, a CVSS 9.0 vulnerability on a test server receives the same urgency as the same vulnerability on a payment processing database. This skill covers building a multi-factor scoring model incorporating data sensitivity, business function dependency, regulatory scope, network exposure, and recoverability to create a 1-5 criticality tier that directly modifies vulnerability remediation SLAs.

When to Use

  • When conducting security assessments that involve performing asset criticality scoring for vulns
  • When following incident response procedures for related security events
  • When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
  • When validating security controls through hands-on testing

Prerequisites

  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB) or asset inventory
  • Business Impact Analysis (BIA) data
  • Data classification policy
  • Network architecture documentation
  • Stakeholder input from business unit owners

Core Concepts

Asset Criticality Scoring Model
FactorWeightScore RangeDescription
Business Function Impact25%1-5How critical is the supported business process
Data Sensitivity25%1-5Type and sensitivity of data processed/stored
Regulatory Scope15%1-5Regulatory requirements (PCI, HIPAA, SOX)
Network Exposure15%1-5Internet-facing vs internal-only
Recoverability10%1-5RTO/RPO requirements, DR capability
User Population10%1-5Number of users/customers affected
Criticality Tier Definitions
TierScore RangeLabelSLA ModifierExamples
14.5-5.0Crown Jewels-50% SLADomain controllers, payment systems, ERP
23.5-4.4High Value-25% SLAEmail servers, HR systems, CI/CD
32.5-3.4StandardBaseline SLAInternal apps, file servers
41.5-2.4Low Impact+25% SLATest environments, printers
51.0-1.4Minimal+50% SLADecommissioning, isolated labs
Data Sensitivity Scoring
ScoreClassificationExamples
5Restricted/SecretPII, PHI, payment card data, trade secrets
4ConfidentialFinancial reports, HR records, source code
3InternalInternal documents, policies, project files
2Semi-publicMarketing materials, press releases (draft)
1PublicPublished content, public APIs

Workflow

Step 1: Define Scoring Criteria
class AssetCriticalityScorer:
    """Multi-factor asset criticality scoring engine."""

    WEIGHTS = {
        "business_function": 0.25,
        "data_sensitivity": 0.25,
        "regulatory_scope": 0.15,
        "network_exposure": 0.15,
        "recoverability": 0.10,
        "user_population": 0.10,
    }

    TIER_THRESHOLDS = [
        (4.5, 1, "Crown Jewels", -0.50),
        (3.5, 2, "High Value", -0.25),
        (2.5, 3, "Standard", 0.00),
        (1.5, 4, "Low Impact", 0.25),
        (1.0, 5, "Minimal", 0.50),
    ]

    def score_asset(self, asset):
        """Calculate criticality score for an asset."""
        weighted_score = sum(
            asset.get(factor, 3) * weight
            for factor, weight in self.WEIGHTS.items()
        )
        score = round(weighted_score, 2)

        for threshold, tier, label, sla_mod in self.TIER_THRESHOLDS:
            if score >= threshold:
                return {
                    "score": score,
                    "tier": tier,
                    "label": label,
                    "sla_modifier": sla_mod,
                }
        return {"score": score, "tier": 5, "label": "Minimal", "sla_modifier": 0.50}

    def adjust_vuln_sla(self, base_sla_days, asset_tier_data):
        """Adjust vulnerability SLA based on asset criticality."""
        modifier = asset_tier_data["sla_modifier"]
        adjusted = int(base_sla_days * (1 + modifier))
        return max(1, adjusted)  # Minimum 1 day SLA
Step 2: Integrate with Vulnerability Prioritization
def apply_criticality_to_vulns(vulns_df, asset_scores):
    """Enrich vulnerability data with asset criticality context."""
    for idx, vuln in vulns_df.iterrows():
        asset_id = vuln.get("asset_id", "")
        asset_data = asset_scores.get(asset_id, {"tier": 3, "sla_modifier": 0})

        vulns_df.at[idx, "asset_tier"] = asset_data["tier"]
        vulns_df.at[idx, "asset_label"] = asset_data.get("label", "Standard")

        base_sla = get_base_sla(vuln["severity"])
        adjusted_sla = int(base_sla * (1 + asset_data["sla_modifier"]))
        vulns_df.at[idx, "adjusted_sla_days"] = max(1, adjusted_sla)

    return vulns_df

Best Practices

  1. Involve business stakeholders in criticality scoring; IT alone cannot assess business impact
  2. Review and update criticality scores at least quarterly or when systems change roles
  3. Automate scoring where possible using CMDB tags and data classification labels
  4. Apply criticality tiers to vulnerability SLAs for risk-proportional remediation
  5. Validate scoring against actual incident impact data to calibrate the model
  6. Start with a simple 3-tier model before expanding to 5 tiers

Common Pitfalls

  • Classifying all assets as "critical" which defeats the purpose of tiering
  • Not updating criticality scores when systems are repurposed or decommissioned
  • Using only technical factors without business context
  • Applying uniform SLAs regardless of asset importance
  • Not documenting the scoring methodology for audit and consistency

Related Skills

  • performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog
  • building-vulnerability-aging-and-sla-tracking
  • performing-business-impact-analysis
  • implementing-asset-management-program

Comments

Markdown supported