About plg-ai-funnel
A skill describing how product-led growth teams can make products and documentation easier for AI agents to discover, interpret, and recommend. It organizes the work into four stages, from agent queries through product recommendations.
Key features
- 01Four-stage AI discovery funnel
- 02Brand and category visibility audit
- 03Documentation extractability checklist
- 04Feature-to-problem mapping
- 05Recommendation metrics framework
Use cases
- 01Audit whether AI mentions a brand
- 02Improve documentation for AI extraction
- 03Clarify product capabilities by use case
- 04Track AI product recommendations
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ majesticlabs-dev/ majestic-marketplace --skill plg-ai-funnelAfter installing, type/plg-ai-funnelin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMEPLG AI Funnel: Product-Led Growth in the Agent Era
The Paradigm Shift
Old PLG Funnel:
Landing Page → Free Trial → Activation → Conversion
New PLG Funnel:
Agent Query → Documentation Scan → Feature Match → Recommendation
The buyer's first interaction is no longer your landing page—it's an AI agent scanning your documentation to answer their question.
The Four Stages
Stage 1: Agent Query
What happens: User asks AI "What tool can help me [problem]?"
Optimization goals:
- Brand appears in AI's consideration set
- Correct category association
- Problem-solution mapping exists in AI's knowledge
Tactics:
| Action | Why It Works |
|---|---|
| Entity building | AI must know your brand exists and what category it's in |
| Third-party mentions | Reviews, comparisons, listicles feed AI training data |
| Clear positioning | "X is a [category] that [primary benefit]" statements |
Audit questions:
- Does AI know your brand when asked directly?
- Does AI associate your brand with your category?
- Do competitors appear but you don't?
Tool: entity-builder agent for authority building
Stage 2: Documentation Scan
What happens: AI scans your docs, help center, marketing pages to understand capabilities.
Optimization goals:
- Content is AI-extractable (chunked, structured)
- Answers are front-loaded (not buried)
- Each page passes the "Taco Bell Test" (stands alone)
Tactics:
| Action | Why It Works |
|---|---|
| Answer-first structure | AI extracts the first sentence as the answer |
| FAQ sections | Pre-formatted Q&A is ideal for extraction |
| Structured data | Tables, bullets, headers signal discrete facts |
| Standalone sections | AI may only see one chunk, not the full page |
The Extractability Checklist:
☐ First sentence directly answers the page's implied question
☐ H2/H3 headers are questions or clear topic labels
☐ Tables used for comparisons and feature lists
☐ Each section makes sense without surrounding context
☐ No "as mentioned above" or "see below" dependencies
Tool: llm-optimizer agent for content optimization
Stage 3: Feature Match
What happens: AI matches user's specific needs to your product's capabilities.
Optimization goals:
- Features described in user-problem terms
- Use cases explicitly mapped to capabilities
- Limitations clearly stated (builds trust)
Tactics:
| Action | Why It Works |
|---|---|
| Problem → Feature mapping | "If you need X, [Product] does Y" |
| Use-case pages | Dedicated pages per job-to-be-done |
| Integration lists | AI checks compatibility requirements |
| Pricing clarity | AI needs to match budget constraints |
Feature Documentation Template:
## [Feature Name]
**Problem it solves:** [User problem in their words]
**How it works:** [1-2 sentence explanation]
**Best for:** [Specific use cases]
**Limitations:** [What it doesn't do]
**Example:** [Concrete scenario]
Anti-pattern: Feature pages that describe functionality without connecting to user problems.
Stage 4: Recommendation
What happens: AI decides whether to recommend your product and how to position it.
Optimization goals:
- Clear differentiation from alternatives
- Social proof AI can cite
- Product tie-backs throughout content
Tactics:
| Action | Why It Works |
|---|---|
| Comparison content | "X vs Y" pages AI directly references |
| Quantified outcomes | "Reduces time by 40%" > "saves time" |
| Review presence | G2, Capterra reviews influence AI recommendations |
| Product mentions in answers | Every content piece connects back to product |
The Product Tie-Back Rule: Every 1-2 paragraphs of educational content should include how your product relates.
- ❌ "Lead scoring helps prioritize prospects"
- ✅ "Lead scoring helps prioritize prospects—[Product] automates this with AI-powered scoring"
Tool: aeo-scorecard skill for measuring recommendation success
PLG × AEO Integration
| PLG Stage | AEO Concept | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Query | Entity/Authority | AI Visibility % |
| Documentation Scan | Extractability | Citation Rate |
| Feature Match | Fact-Density | Feature mention accuracy |
| Recommendation | Product Tie-Back | AI Share of Voice |
Quick Audit Workflow
1. Test 10 queries your buyers ask
→ Does your brand appear? (Stage 1)
2. Check if AI cites YOUR content
→ Or competitor/third-party? (Stage 2)
3. Ask AI about specific features
→ Does it know your capabilities? (Stage 3)
4. Ask "Should I use [Product] for [use case]?"
→ What's the recommendation? (Stage 4)
Common PLG AI Gaps
| Symptom | Stage Broken | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Brand unknown to AI | Query | Entity building, third-party mentions |
| AI cites competitors' content | Documentation | Improve extractability, answer-first |
| AI misunderstands features | Feature Match | Rewrite feature docs with problem framing |
| AI recommends competitor | Recommendation | Strengthen differentiation, add social proof |
Related Tools
llm-optimizer- Deep content optimization for Stage 2entity-builder- Authority building for Stage 1aeo-scorecard- Metrics framework for all stages/aeo-workflow- Full implementation workflowquery-expansion-strategy- Understanding query fan-out