mcpField
P
pr-review

pr-review

github.com/wkentaroTesting & quality064 installsUpdated 6d ago
Repository

About pr-review

A code-review skill for evaluating pull requests against linked issues and the code at the head commit. It uses five ordered checks to produce a verdict and, for revisions, specify needed changes.

Key features

  1. 01Review title, description, and tests
  2. 02Compare claims with issue and code
  3. 03Assess value, approach, correctness, and scope
  4. 04Apply verdicts by first failed check
  5. 05Report evidence and revision requests

Use cases

  1. 01Review a named pull request
  2. 02Check all eligible open repository PRs
  3. 03Decide whether to merge, revise, triage, or close
  4. 04Give authors specific revision guidance

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/wkentaro/agent-skills --skill pr-review

After installing, type/pr-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesagents/openai.yaml

Details

From the project README

PR Review

With PRs named, check each one. With none, check every open non-draft PR in the current repository that has no recommend-* label, one subagent per PR.

Check the title, description, and tests against the linked issue and the code at the head commit; they are claims.

Answer five questions in order, each with one line of evidence:

  1. Meaningful: is the problem real and still present on the base branch?
  2. Worth adding: does the value justify the scope and ongoing maintenance?
  3. Right approach: would you solve it this way, at the root cause? Fail it only by naming an alternative and what it gains: a different design, or a refactor or architecture change that lands first and shrinks or removes this change.
  4. Correct: does it solve the problem without breaking a caller or edge case, and do the tests it adds for changed behavior fail on the base branch?
  5. Minimal: is every changed line needed, with nothing that existing code already does?

Take the first failure's verdict:

FailsVerdict
Meaningful, or Worth adding for a technical reasonrecommend-close
Worth adding as a product or scope callrecommend-triage
Right approach, Correct, or Minimalrecommend-revise
Nothingrecommend-merge

Report to the caller the verdict, the five answers, and for revise the specific changes needed. The caller decides what reaches the PR.

Comments

Markdown supported