mcpField
P
principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state

principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state

github.com/hachejDevelopment161 installsUpdated 1w ago
Repository

About principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state

A development skill for handling mutable state shared by concurrent actors. It recommends eliminating shared write targets when possible, and using structural serialization when a shared target is truly required.

Key features

  1. 01Identify shared mutable state
  2. 02Separate independent write targets
  3. 03Merge at reporting boundaries
  4. 04Serialize writes when sharing is required
  5. 05Treat locking as a design signal

Use cases

  1. 01Preventing concurrent file-write races
  2. 02Designing state ownership for multiple workers
  3. 03Choosing serialization for a canonical shared object

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/hachej/boring-stack --skill principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state

After installing, type/principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-statein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesLICENSE

Details

From the project README

Separate Before Serializing Shared State

When concurrent actors might share mutable state, first ask whether they need the same mutable object. If not, eliminate the sharing. When sharing is real, enforce serialization structurally: lockfiles, sequential phases, exclusive ownership. Instructions and conventions are not concurrency control.

Why: Concurrent writes to shared state create race conditions that are intermittent, hard to reproduce, and expensive to debug.

Pattern:

  1. Identify shared mutable state (files both read and write, branches both push to, APIs both define and consume).
  2. Default: eliminate the shared write target. Ask: do these actors need one canonical object, or are they publishing independent facts? Give each actor its own owned file, key, branch, or state directory, and merge only at the read/reporting boundary. Two workers writing their own lastX field into one state.json is still shared mutation. indexer-state.json + metrics-state.json is not.
  3. Only when one shared write target is a real invariant, serialize access structurally (lockfiles, sequential phases, single-writer actor, or atomic compare-and-swap). Treat "we need a lock" as a design smell to check, not as the default answer.

Comments

Markdown supported