About process-documentation
process-documentation is a skill for creating clear process guides that newcomers can follow. It structures responsibilities, steps, exceptions, and escalation paths.
Key features
- 01Define process purpose and scope
- 02List prerequisites and role responsibilities
- 03Write steps with owners and tools
- 04Document exceptions and common mistakes
- 05Set escalation paths and review dates
Use cases
- 01Create a process guide for new team members
- 02Document recurring or event-triggered operations
- 03Turn rough process notes into a guide
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ mohitagw15856/ pm-claude-skills --skill process-documentationAfter installing, type/process-documentationin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMEProcess Documentation Skill
Produces clear, structured process documentation that someone new to a role can follow without needing to ask questions.
Required Inputs
- Process name
- Process description (rough notes are fine)
- Who does this process (roles involved)
- How often it runs (daily / weekly / monthly / event-triggered)
- Tools involved
- Known edge cases
Output Structure
Process: [Process Name]
Owner: [Role] | Frequency: [How often] | Estimated time: [Duration]
Purpose
[1-2 sentences. Why does this process exist? What breaks if it is not done?]
Scope
In scope: [What this covers] Out of scope: [What it does not cover]
Prerequisites
- [Required access or information]
- [Any dependency that must be completed first]
Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| [Role 1] | [What they do] |
Process Steps
Step 1: [Step name]
- Who: [Role]
- When: [Trigger or timing]
- How: [Substeps numbered]
- Output: [What exists at end of this step]
- Tool: [System used]
[Continue for all steps]
Edge Cases and Exceptions
| Situation | What to do | Who to contact |
|---|---|---|
| [Edge case] | [Action] | [Name/role] |
Common Mistakes
[2-4 things people get wrong the first time]
Escalation Path
[Name/role] → [Next level] → [Final escalation]
Review
Next review due: [Date]
Quality Checks
- Every step has a named role (not "someone" or "the team")
- Edge cases and exceptions table is complete
- Prerequisites are listed so someone new can prepare before starting
- Escalation path is named (specific people or roles, not just "your manager")
- Review date is set
Anti-Patterns
- Do not write steps without specifying who is responsible for each — ownership must be explicit throughout
- Do not omit the escalation path — every process must say what happens when something goes wrong
- Do not document the ideal process if the real process differs — document reality, then note improvements separately
- Do not skip edge cases and exceptions — they are where most process failures actually occur
- Do not produce documentation without a review date — undated process docs quickly become incorrect
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Document this process: [description]"
- "Write a process guide for [workflow]"
- "Map out how [process] works"