mcpField
P
profiling-tables

profiling-tables

github.com/astronomerData & databases4571.0k installsUpdated 3w ago
Repository

About profiling-tables

A data-profiling skill for analysts and data teams, guiding SQL-based inspection of a table’s structure, statistics, quality, and useful queries.

Key features

  1. 01Column metadata and table size
  2. 02Type-specific column statistics
  3. 03Categorical cardinality analysis
  4. 04Sample rows and data quality review
  5. 05Structured profile with query suggestions

Use cases

  1. 01Document an unfamiliar table for a new teammate
  2. 02Inspect nulls, duplicates, and value ranges
  3. 03Review category frequencies and distributions

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/astronomer/agents --skill profiling-tables

After installing, type/profiling-tablesin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Data Profile

Generate a comprehensive profile of a table that a new team member could use to understand the data.

Step 1: Basic Metadata

Query column metadata:

SELECT COLUMN_NAME, DATA_TYPE, COMMENT
FROM <database>.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = '<schema>' AND TABLE_NAME = '<table>'
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION

If the table name isn't fully qualified, search INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES to locate it first.

Step 2: Size and Shape

Run via run_sql:

SELECT
    COUNT(*) as total_rows,
    COUNT(*) / 1000000.0 as millions_of_rows
FROM <table>

Step 3: Column-Level Statistics

For each column, gather appropriate statistics based on data type:

Numeric Columns
SELECT
    MIN(column_name) as min_val,
    MAX(column_name) as max_val,
    AVG(column_name) as avg_val,
    STDDEV(column_name) as std_dev,
    PERCENTILE_CONT(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY column_name) as median,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count,
    COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>
String Columns
SELECT
    MIN(LEN(column_name)) as min_length,
    MAX(LEN(column_name)) as max_length,
    AVG(LEN(column_name)) as avg_length,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL OR column_name = '' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as empty_count,
    COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>
Date/Timestamp Columns
SELECT
    MIN(column_name) as earliest,
    MAX(column_name) as latest,
    DATEDIFF('day', MIN(column_name), MAX(column_name)) as date_range_days,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count
FROM <table>

Step 4: Cardinality Analysis

For columns that look like categorical/dimension keys:

SELECT
    column_name,
    COUNT(*) as frequency,
    ROUND(COUNT(*) * 100.0 / SUM(COUNT(*)) OVER(), 2) as percentage
FROM <table>
GROUP BY column_name
ORDER BY frequency DESC
LIMIT 20

This reveals:

  • High-cardinality columns (likely IDs or unique values)
  • Low-cardinality columns (likely categories or status fields)
  • Skewed distributions (one value dominates)

Step 5: Sample Data

Get representative rows:

SELECT *
FROM <table>
LIMIT 10

If the table is large and you want variety, sample from different time periods or categories.

Step 6: Data Quality Assessment

Summarize quality across dimensions:

Completeness
  • Which columns have NULLs? What percentage?
  • Are NULLs expected or problematic?
Uniqueness
  • Does the apparent primary key have duplicates?
  • Are there unexpected duplicate rows?
Freshness
  • When was data last updated? (MAX of timestamp columns)
  • Is the update frequency as expected?
Validity
  • Are there values outside expected ranges?
  • Are there invalid formats (dates, emails, etc.)?
  • Are there orphaned foreign keys?
Consistency
  • Do related columns make sense together?
  • Are there logical contradictions?

Step 7: Output Summary

Provide a structured profile:

Overview

2-3 sentences describing what this table contains, who uses it, and how fresh it is.

Schema
ColumnTypeNulls%DistinctDescription
...............
Key Statistics
  • Row count: X
  • Date range: Y to Z
  • Last updated: timestamp
Data Quality Score
  • Completeness: X/10
  • Uniqueness: X/10
  • Freshness: X/10
  • Overall: X/10
Potential Issues

List any data quality concerns discovered.

Recommended Queries

3-5 useful queries for common questions about this data.

Comments

Markdown supported