mcpField
P
project-setup

project-setup

github.com/codewithmukeshDevelopment7912.9k installsUpdated 12w ago
Repository

About project-setup

A tech-stack advisor skill for .NET projects that explains the kit’s defaults and their trade-offs. It helps developers choose options such as databases, authentication, and caching, while routing initialization, assessment, and migration work to dedicated skills.

Key features

  1. 01Recommendations across eight stack dimensions
  2. 02Explains rationale and trade-offs
  3. 03Prefers built-in .NET capabilities
  4. 04Accounts for dependency licensing
  5. 05Routes other workflows to dedicated skills

Use cases

  1. 01Choose database and authentication for a project
  2. 02Assess caching or messaging needs
  3. 03Select observability and testing components
  4. 04Route setup or migration requests to the relevant skill

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill project-setup

After installing, type/project-setupin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Project Setup — Tech-Stack Advisor

This skill owns one thing: the kit's recommended tech-stack defaults and why. The workflows that consume it live elsewhere:

  • Initializing a project / generating CLAUDE.md → dotnet-init (interactive flow, architecture questionnaire, CLAUDE.md generation)
  • Assessing an existing codebase → health-check (the canonical 8-dimension graded assessment)
  • EF Core schema, NuGet, or .NET version migrations → migrate
  • Choosing an architecture → architecture-advisor (always ask before recommending)

Core Principles

  1. Recommend a default, explain the why, let the user choose — Every dimension has a kit default, but defaults are starting points, not mandates. State the trade-off in one line so the choice is informed.
  2. Prefer built-in .NET over third-party — HybridCache over Redis-client wrappers, built-in rate limiting over packages, built-in OpenAPI over Swashbuckle. Fewer dependencies means fewer licensing surprises and upgrade breaks.
  3. License-aware picks — MediatR (v13+), MassTransit (v9+), and FluentAssertions (v8+) went commercial. The kit defaults to MIT alternatives: Mediator, Wolverine, plain xUnit asserts.
  4. Add messaging later, not never — Most projects don't need a message bus on day one. Default to "None (add later)" and reach for Wolverine when async workflows actually appear.

Patterns

Tech-Stack Dimensions and Defaults
DimensionOptionsDefaultWhy
DatabasePostgreSQL, SQL Server, SQLitePostgreSQLOpen source, best EF Core provider outside SQL Server, first-class Testcontainers support
AuthJWT Bearer, OIDC (Keycloak/Auth0), NoneJWT BearerSimplest secure default for APIs; move to OIDC when an external IdP exists
CachingHybridCache, Redis, NoneHybridCacheBuilt-in, stampede protection, L1+L2 — add Redis only as its L2 backend
MessagingWolverine (RabbitMQ), MassTransit, NoneNone (add later)Premature messaging adds ops burden; Wolverine (MIT) when needed
ObservabilitySerilog + OpenTelemetry, Basic loggingSerilog + OTELStructured logs + traces from day one are cheap; retrofitting is not
ResiliencePolly v8 pipelines, Basic retryPolly v8AddStandardResilienceHandler() is one line for production-grade defaults
API docsBuilt-in OpenAPI + ScalarOpenAPI + ScalarFramework-maintained spec generation; Scalar replaces Swagger UI
TestingxUnit v3 + TestcontainersxUnit v3 + TestcontainersReal databases in tests; in-memory providers hide real bugs

Once dimensions are chosen, dotnet-init bakes them into the generated CLAUDE.md, and each choice maps to a skill to load when working in that area (ef-core, authentication, caching, messaging, serilog, opentelemetry, resilience, openapi, scalar, testing).

Anti-patterns

Prescribing a Stack Without Asking
# BAD — assuming the kit defaults apply everywhere
"You should use PostgreSQL and Wolverine."
# The team runs SQL Server enterprise-wide and has zero async workflows.

# GOOD — default + trade-off + question
"Kit default is PostgreSQL (best OSS EF provider). Any organizational
constraint — existing SQL Server licenses, DBA support — that should
override it?"
Re-Running Workflows This Skill Doesn't Own
# BAD — improvising a health grading or init flow from this skill
"Let me grade your codebase across 5 categories..."
# That grading conflicts with the canonical one.

# GOOD — route to the owner
Init/CLAUDE.md → dotnet-init | Assessment → health-check | Upgrades → migrate

Decision Guide

ScenarioRoute to
"Set up this project for Claude Code"dotnet-init
"Which database/auth/caching should I use?"This skill — table above
"How healthy is this codebase?"health-check
"Upgrade to .NET 10" / "update packages"migrate
"Which architecture fits?"architecture-advisor
Stack chosen, ready to buildscaffold for the first feature

Comments

Markdown supported