mcpField
Q
qa-review

qa-review

github.com/arjun988Testing & quality1.3k333 installsUpdated 16w ago
Repository

About qa-review

A quality-review guide for 3D asset production, intended for exports, handoffs, and milestone checks. It combines screenshots, defect severity levels, and checklists, and requires a clear ship decision.

Key features

  1. 01Capture screenshots from key angles
  2. 02Run relevant review checklists
  3. 03Record defects by severity
  4. 04Re-verify after fixes
  5. 05Give an explicit ship verdict

Use cases

  1. 01Review before export or handoff
  2. 02Check major modeling or look-development milestones
  3. 03Compare final work against references
  4. 04Perform periodic scene health checks

MCP support

When connected to MCP, the guide uses get_viewport_screenshot to capture viewport images as evidence for visual review.

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/arjun988/blender-skills --skill qa-review

After installing, type/qa-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled filesreferences/qa-verdict-template.mdreferences/screenshot-angles.md

Details

From the project README

QA Review

Screenshot-backed review. Checklist gate. Explicit ship / no-ship.

When to Use

  • Before export or handoff
  • After major modeling/lookdev milestones
  • Reference-match final compare
  • Periodic scene health checks

Workflow

Gather brief budgets → Screenshot key angles → Run checklists
  → List defects (severity) → Fix or reject → Re-verify → Verdict

Required Screenshots

  1. 3/4 hero angle
  2. Ortho or profile if proportion-critical
  3. Wireframe or poly overview (optional but useful)
  4. Material/light beauty
  5. Vs reference (if reference task)

Use get_viewport_screenshot via MCP when connected.

Checklists (load as needed)

  • ../references/validation-checklist.md
  • ../references/visual-match-checklist.md (reference tasks)
  • ../references/naming-conventions.md
  • ../references/polycount-budgets.md

Defect Severity

LevelMeaning
BlockerWrong scale, broken normals, fails budget badly
MajorSilhouette/readability issues, bad pivots
MinorNaming, minor shading, small gaps
NoteOptional polish

Verdict Template

## QA Verdict: [Asset]

**Result:** SHIP / SHIP WITH NOTES / NO-SHIP
**Budgets:** [tris/textures] vs target
**Screenshots:** [listed]
**Blockers:** ...
**Majors:** ...
**Minors:** ...
**Next actions:** ...

Constraints

MUST DO
  • Give explicit verdict
  • Attach or capture screenshots for visual claims
  • Re-check after fixes before flipping to SHIP
MUST NOT DO
  • Rubber-stamp without screenshots on visual tasks
  • Ignore budget overruns without approval

Reference Guide

TopicReferenceLoad When
Qa Verdict Templatereferences/qa-verdict-template.mdWhen needed
Screenshot Anglesreferences/screenshot-angles.mdWhen needed

Comments

Markdown supported