mcpField
Q
qe-agentic-quality-engineering

qe-agentic-quality-engineering

github.com/proffesor-for-testingTesting & quality51986 installsUpdated today
Repository

About qe-agentic-quality-engineering

qe-agentic-quality-engineering is a skill for teams implementing agent-assisted quality engineering and coordinating testing agents. It describes agent selection, coordination, persistent memory, and human-reviewed quality gates across testing workflows.

Key features

  1. 01Select agents for testing tasks
  2. 02Coordinate agents in multiple patterns
  3. 03Generate tests and analyze coverage
  4. 04Persist learnings in memory
  5. 05Validate results with quality gates

Use cases

  1. 01Introduce an agent for a focused testing task
  2. 02Coordinate a multi-agent PR quality pipeline
  3. 03Store and retrieve testing patterns
  4. 04Review agent results before deployment

MCP support

The skill documents MCP tools for storing and retrieving persistent agent memory. It also describes agent coordination workflows and quality gates.

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-agentic-quality-engineering

After installing, type/qe-agentic-quality-engineeringin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Agentic Quality Engineering

<default_to_action> When implementing agentic QE or coordinating agents:

  1. SPAWN appropriate agent(s) for the task using Task tool with agent type
  2. CONFIGURE agent coordination (hierarchical/mesh/sequential)
  3. EXECUTE with PACTS principles: Proactive analysis, Autonomous operation, Collaborative feedback, Targeted risk focus, Structured governance (observability and explainability of agent behavior)
  4. VALIDATE results through quality gates before deployment
  5. LEARN from outcomes - store patterns in aqe/learning/* namespace

Quick Agent Selection:

  • Test generation needed → qe-test-generator
  • Coverage gaps → qe-coverage-analyzer
  • Quality decision → qe-quality-gate
  • Security scan → qe-security-scanner
  • Performance test → qe-performance-tester
  • Full pipeline → qe-fleet-commander

Critical Success Factors:

  • Agents amplify human expertise, not replace it
  • Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions
  • Measure: bugs caught, time saved, coverage improved </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use
  • Designing autonomous testing systems
  • Scaling QE with intelligent agents
  • Implementing multi-agent coordination
  • Building CI/CD quality pipelines
PACTS Principles
PrincipleAgent BehaviorHuman Role
ProactiveAnalyze pre-merge, predict riskSet guardrails
AutonomousExecute tests, fix flaky testsReview critical
CollaborativeMulti-agent coordinationProvide context
TargetedRisk-based prioritizationDefine risk areas
StructuredGovernance, observability, explainable decisions (measure confidence, not trust)Audit behavior, set policy
19-Agent Fleet
CategoryAgentsPrimary Use
Core Testing (5)test-generator, test-executor, coverage-analyzer, quality-gate, quality-analyzerDaily testing
Performance/Security (2)performance-tester, security-scannerNon-functional
Strategic (3)requirements-validator, production-intelligence, fleet-commanderPlanning
Advanced (4)regression-risk-analyzer, test-data-architect, api-contract-validator, flaky-test-hunterSpecialized
Visual/Chaos (2)visual-tester, chaos-engineerEdge cases
Deployment (1)deployment-readinessRelease
Analysis (1)code-complexityMaintainability
Coordination Patterns
Hierarchical: fleet-commander → [generators] → [executors] → quality-gate
Mesh: test-gen ↔ coverage ↔ quality (peer decisions)
Sequential: risk-analyzer → test-gen → executor → coverage → gate
Success Criteria

✅ 10x deployment frequency with same/better quality ✅ Coverage gaps detected in real-time ✅ Bugs caught pre-production ❌ Agents acting without human oversight on critical decisions ❌ Deploying all 19 agents at once (start with 1-2)


Core Concepts

QE Evolution
StageApproachLimitation
TraditionalManual everythingHuman bottleneck
AutomationScripts + fixed scenariosNeeds orchestration
AgenticAI agents + human judgmentRequires trust-building

Core Premise: Agents amplify human expertise for 10x scale.

Key Capabilities

1. Intelligent Test Generation

// Agent analyzes code change, generates targeted tests
const tests = await qeTestGenerator.generate(prDiff);
// → Happy path, edge cases, error handling tests

2. Pattern Detection - Scan logs, find anomalies, correlate errors

3. Adaptive Strategy - Adjust test focus based on risk signals

4. Root Cause Analysis - Link failures to code changes, suggest fixes


Agent Coordination

Memory Namespaces
aqe/test-plan/*     - Test planning decisions
aqe/coverage/*      - Coverage analysis results
aqe/quality/*       - Quality metrics and gates
aqe/learning/*      - Patterns and Q-values
aqe/coordination/*  - Cross-agent state
Memory Operations (MCP Tools)

CRITICAL: Always use aqe memory store with persist: true for learnings.

1. Store data to persistent memory:

# Store test plan decisions (persisted to .agentic-qe/memory.db)
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/test-plan/pr-123" \
  --namespace "aqe/test-plan" \
  --value '{"prNumber":123,"riskLevel":"medium","requiredCoverage":85,"testTypes":["unit","integration"]}' \
  --ttl 604800 \
  --json

2. Retrieve prior learnings before task:

# Query patterns before starting test generation
aqe memory search \
  --pattern "aqe/learning/patterns/test-generation/*" \
  --namespace "aqe/learning" \
  --json

3. Store coverage analysis results:

aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coverage/auth-module" \
  --namespace "aqe/coverage" \
  --value '{"moduleId":"auth-module","currentCoverage":78,"gaps":["error-handling","edge-cases"],"priority":"high"}' \
  --ttl 1209600 \
  --json
Three-Phase Memory Protocol

For coordinated multi-agent tasks, use the STATUS → PROGRESS → COMPLETE pattern:

# PHASE 1: STATUS - Task starting
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/status" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{"status":"running","agent":"qe-test-generator"}' \
  --json

# PHASE 2: PROGRESS - Intermediate updates
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/progress" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{"progress":50,"action":"generating-unit-tests","testsGenerated":25}' \
  --json

# PHASE 3: COMPLETE - Task finished
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/complete" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{"status":"complete","result":"success","testsGenerated":47,"coverageAchieved":92.3}' \
  --json
Blackboard Events
EventTriggerSubscribers
test:generatedNew tests createdexecutor, coverage
coverage:gapGap detectedtest-generator
quality:decisionGate evaluatedfleet-commander
security:findingVulnerability foundquality-gate
Example: PR Quality Pipeline
// 1. Risk analysis
const risks = await Task("Analyze PR", prDiff, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");

// 2. Generate tests for risks
const tests = await Task("Generate tests", risks, "qe-test-generator");

// 3. Execute + analyze
const results = await Task("Run tests", tests, "qe-test-executor");
const coverage = await Task("Check coverage", results, "qe-coverage-analyzer");

// 4. Quality decision
const decision = await Task("Evaluate", {results, coverage}, "qe-quality-gate");
// → GO/NO-GO with rationale

Implementation Phases

PhaseDurationGoalAgent(s)
ExperimentWeeks 1-4Validate one use case1 agent
IntegrateMonths 2-3CI/CD pipeline3-4 agents
ScaleMonths 4-6Multiple use cases8+ agents
EvolveOngoingContinuous learningFull fleet
Phase 1 Example
# Week 1: Deploy single agent
aqe agent spawn qe-test-generator

# Weeks 2-3: Generate tests for 10 PRs
# Track: bugs found, test quality, review time

# Week 4: Measure impact
aqe agent metrics qe-test-generator
# → Tests: 150, Bugs: 12, Time saved: 8h

Limitations & Strengths

Agents Excel At
  • Volume: Scan thousands of logs in seconds
  • Patterns: Find correlations humans miss
  • Tireless: 24/7 testing and monitoring
  • Speed: Instant code change analysis
Agents Need Humans For
  • Business context and priorities
  • Ethical judgment and trade-offs
  • Creative exploration ("what if" scenarios)
  • Domain expertise (healthcare, finance, legal)

Best Practices

DoDon't
Start with one agent, one use caseDeploy all 18 at once
Build feedback loops earlyDeploy and forget
Human reviews agent outputAuto-merge without review
Measure bugs caught, time savedTrack vanity metrics (test count)
Build trust graduallyGive full autonomy immediately
Trust Progression
Month 1: Agent suggests → Human decides
Month 2: Agent acts → Human reviews after
Month 3: Agent autonomous on low-risk
Month 4: Agent handles critical with oversight

Agent Coordination Hints

coordination:
  topology: hierarchical
  commander: qe-fleet-commander
  memory_namespace: aqe/coordination
  blackboard_topic: qe-fleet

preload_skills:
  - agentic-quality-engineering  # Always (this skill)
  - risk-based-testing           # For prioritization
  - quality-metrics              # For measurement

agent_assignments:
  qe-test-generator: [api-testing-patterns, tdd-london-chicago]
  qe-coverage-analyzer: [quality-metrics, risk-based-testing]
  qe-security-scanner: [security-testing, risk-based-testing]
  qe-performance-tester: [performance-testing]

Related Skills

  • holistic-testing-pact - PACTS principles deep dive
  • risk-based-testing - Prioritize agent focus
  • quality-metrics - Measure agent effectiveness
  • api-testing-patterns, security-testing, performance-testing - Specialized testing

Resources

  • Agent definitions: .claude/agents/
  • CLI: aqe agent --help
  • Fleet status: aqe fleet status

Success Metric: Deploy 10x more frequently with same or better quality through intelligent agent collaboration.

Comments

Markdown supported