mcpField
Q
qe-defect-intelligence

qe-defect-intelligence

github.com/proffesor-for-testingTesting & quality51994 installsUpdated today
Repository

About qe-defect-intelligence

qe-defect-intelligence is a testing skill for teams that want to predict defect risk, learn patterns from past failures, and investigate root causes. It combines change-based risk factors with pattern analysis and structured RCA methods.

Key features

  1. 01Defect prediction from code changes
  2. 02Historical defect pattern learning
  3. 03Root cause analysis methods
  4. 04Risk scores and contributing factors
  5. 05Issue tracker synchronization

Use cases

  1. 01Prioritizing review of risky pull requests
  2. 02Finding recurring failure patterns
  3. 03Investigating the cause of a test failure

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-defect-intelligence

After installing, type/qe-defect-intelligencein Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

evals/
qe-defect-intelligence.yaml
schemas/
output.json
scripts/
validate-config.json

Details

From the project README

QE Defect Intelligence

Purpose

Guide the use of v3's defect intelligence capabilities including ML-based defect prediction, pattern recognition from historical data, and automated root cause analysis.

Activation

  • When predicting defect-prone code
  • When analyzing failure patterns
  • When performing root cause analysis
  • When learning from past defects
  • When prioritizing testing based on risk

Quick Start

# Predict defects in changed code
aqe defect predict --changes HEAD~5..HEAD

# Analyze failure patterns
aqe defect patterns --period 90d --min-occurrences 3

# Root cause analysis
aqe defect rca --failure "test/auth.test.ts:45"

# Learn from resolved defects
aqe defect learn --source jira --status resolved

Agent Workflow

// Defect prediction
Task("Predict defect-prone code", `
  Analyze PR #456 changes and predict defect likelihood:
  - Historical defect correlation
  - Code complexity factors
  - Author experience with module
  - Test coverage gaps
  Flag high-risk changes requiring extra review.
`, "qe-defect-predictor")

// Root cause analysis
Task("Analyze test failure", `
  Investigate recurring failure in AuthService tests:
  - Collect failure history (last 30 days)
  - Identify common patterns
  - Trace to potential root causes
  - Suggest fixes using 5-whys analysis
`, "qe-root-cause-analyzer")

Prediction Models

1. Change-Based Prediction
await defectPredictor.predictFromChanges({
  changes: prChanges,
  factors: {
    codeChurn: { weight: 0.2 },
    complexity: { weight: 0.25 },
    authorExperience: { weight: 0.15 },
    fileHistory: { weight: 0.2 },
    testCoverage: { weight: 0.2 }
  },
  threshold: {
    high: 0.7,
    medium: 0.4,
    low: 0.2
  }
});
2. Pattern Learning
await patternLearner.learnPatterns({
  source: {
    defects: 'jira:project=MYAPP&type=bug',
    commits: 'git:last-6-months',
    tests: 'test-results:last-1000-runs'
  },
  patterns: [
    'code-smell-to-defect',
    'change-coupling',
    'test-gap-correlation',
    'complexity-defect-density'
  ],
  output: {
    rules: true,
    visualizations: true,
    recommendations: true
  }
});
3. Root Cause Analysis
await rootCauseAnalyzer.analyze({
  failure: testFailure,
  methods: [
    'five-whys',
    'fishbone-diagram',
    'fault-tree',
    'change-impact'
  ],
  context: {
    recentChanges: true,
    environmentDiff: true,
    dependencyChanges: true,
    similarFailures: true
  }
});

Defect Prediction Report

interface DefectPrediction {
  file: string;
  riskScore: number;  // 0-1
  riskLevel: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low';
  factors: {
    name: string;
    contribution: number;
    details: string;
  }[];
  historicalDefects: {
    count: number;
    recent: Defect[];
    patterns: string[];
  };
  recommendations: {
    action: string;
    priority: string;
    expectedRiskReduction: number;
  }[];
}

Pattern Categories

PatternDetectionPrevention
Null pointerStatic analysisNull checks, Optional
Race conditionConcurrency analysisLocks, atomic ops
Memory leakHeap analysisResource cleanup
Off-by-oneBoundary analysisLoop invariants
InjectionTaint analysisInput validation

Root Cause Templates

root_cause_analysis:
  five_whys:
    max_depth: 5
    prompt_template: "Why did {effect} happen?"

  fishbone:
    categories:
      - people
      - process
      - tools
      - environment
      - materials
      - measurement

  fault_tree:
    top_event: "Test Failure"
    gate_types: [AND, OR, NOT]
    basic_events: true

Integration with Issue Tracking

await defectIntelligence.syncWithTracker({
  source: 'jira',
  project: 'MYAPP',
  sync: {
    defectData: 'bidirectional',
    predictions: 'create-tasks',
    patterns: 'update-labels'
  },
  automation: {
    flagHighRisk: true,
    suggestAssignee: true,
    linkRelated: true
  }
});

Coordination

Primary Agents: qe-defect-predictor, qe-pattern-learner, qe-root-cause-analyzer Coordinator: qe-defect-intelligence-coordinator Related Skills: qe-coverage-analysis, qe-quality-assessment

Comments

Markdown supported