mcpField
Q
quality-test-implementation

quality-test-implementation

github.com/afonsoftTesting & quality1345 installsUpdated 2d ago
Repository

About quality-test-implementation

quality-test-implementation is a quality-improvement skill for .NET, Java, and Python repositories, aimed at reducing technical debt, resolving analysis warnings, and increasing test coverage. It works through code quality and testing in phases and produces a change report without automatically opening a Pull Request.

Key features

  1. 01Inspect and fix static-analysis warnings
  2. 02Address dependency security vulnerabilities
  3. 03Run tests and coverage by language
  4. 04Apply architecture and style improvements
  5. 05Update README and CHANGELOG
  6. 06Prepare a technical summary without opening a PR

Use cases

  1. 01Reduce technical debt before a release
  2. 02Resolve build and static-analysis issues
  3. 03Increase and report test coverage
  4. 04Address dependency vulnerabilities and prepare delivery documentation

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/afonsoft/skills --skill quality-test-implementation

After installing, type/quality-test-implementationin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

references/
coverage-dotnet.md
coverage-java.md
coverage-python.md
run-coverage.sh

Details

From the project README

Multi-Language Code Quality & Test Coverage

Role

Senior SRE Engineer focused on quality, stability, and technical-debt reduction across multi-language codebases.

Goal

Perform a comprehensive intervention in the target repository to stabilize the build, reduce static-analysis warnings, raise test coverage to the language target, apply high-level architectural patterns, and produce a measured improvement report — without auto-opening a Pull Request.

When to Use

  • A repository (.NET, Java, or Python) has accumulated warnings, smells, or suppressed exceptions.
  • Test coverage is below the language target and needs a structured push.
  • Technical debt must be reduced before a release or handoff.
  • Security CVEs (NU1903, OWASP, Bandit, Safety, Snyk) must be cleared.

When NOT to use: one small file, a single change review, or a quick lint pass. For reviewing a single change, use code-review-and-quality.

  • User asks or mentions this skill in English (e.g., "use /quality-test-implementation", "run quality-test-implementation").
  • O usuário pede ou menciona esta skill em português (ex.: "use /quality-test-implementation", "execute quality-test-implementation").

Inputs

  • REPO_NAME: full name (owner/repo).
  • BASE_BRANCH: branch to start from (default main/develop).
  • OUTPUT_BRANCH: feature/{YYYYMMDD}-{function-name}.
  • PRIMARY_LANGUAGE: dotnet, java, or python.

Phase 1 — Preparation and Environment

  1. Clone {REPO_NAME} if not already present.
  2. Create working branch feature/{YYYYMMDD}-{function-name}.
  3. Identify the build/test tooling:
    • .NET: *.sln, *.csproj, Directory.Build.props, global.json.
    • Java: pom.xml (Maven) or build.gradle* (Gradle).
    • Python: pyproject.toml, setup.py, requirements*.txt, tox.ini.
  4. Keep any Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("Testing", "true") (or equivalent) inside the test execution context only.

Phase 2 — Static Analysis and Warning Correction

Run the appropriate static-analysis tools and fix the following categories.

.NET
CategoryCodesFix
LoggingCA2017, S2629, CA2254Use static templates and consistent placeholders
AsynchronismCS4014, CS1998Add await or remove unnecessary async
CleanupCS0105, CS0219Remove duplicate usings / unused variables
ExceptionsS3445, S2139Replace throw ex; with throw;; add context on rethrow
Web/APIASP0019Use .Append in headers
SecurityNU1903Resolve package vulnerabilities (high priority)
Documentation—Add /// <summary> to public classes and methods

Tools: dotnet build, dotnet test, dotnet format, SonarScanner, Roslyn analyzers.

Java
CategoryCodes / ToolsFix
LoggingSLF4J placeholders, CheckstyleParameterized logging; avoid string concatenation in logs
AsynchronismSpotBugs NP_NULL, Sonar S2190Proper CompletableFuture chaining; avoid fire-and-forget async
CleanupPMD, CheckstyleRemove unused imports and variables
ExceptionsSonar S1166, S2221Preserve stack trace; do not swallow exceptions
Web/APISonar S3751, S2658Use correct header APIs; avoid mutable static state
SecurityOWASP dependency-check, SnykUpdate vulnerable dependencies
DocumentationJavadocAdd Javadoc to public classes and methods

Tools: mvn compile, mvn test, mvn spotbugs:spotbugs, mvn checkstyle:checkstyle, mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check.

Python
CategoryCodes / ToolsFix
LoggingPylint W1203, Ruff G001Use %/f-string formatting with logging correctly
AsynchronismPylint W0707, Ruff ASYNCUse await properly; avoid asyncio fire-and-forget
CleanupF401, F841 (Ruff/Flake8)Remove unused imports and variables
ExceptionsPylint W0706, W0719Re-raise with raise or raise Custom() with from
Web/APIBandit B104Avoid hard-coded * in CORS; validate headers
SecurityBandit, Safety, SnykFix high/critical CVEs in requirements.txt / pyproject.toml
DocumentationPydocstyle, Ruff DAdd docstrings to public classes and methods

Tools: ruff check ., ruff format ., mypy, pylint, bandit -r ., pytest --cov=src --cov-report=xml.


Phase 3 — Architecture and Style

Refactor only when it reduces warnings or improves testability.

SOLID
  • Single Responsibility: split classes/modules that mix persistence, business logic, and presentation.
  • Dependency Inversion: depend on abstractions (interfaces/abstract classes/protocols) instead of concrete implementations.
DDD
  • Identify Aggregates, Entities, Value Objects, and Repositories.
  • Keep domain logic independent of frameworks and UI.
Clean Architecture
  • Validate separation between Domain, Application, Infrastructure, and Presentation.
  • Domain must not depend on external frameworks, databases, or UI libraries.

Phase 4 — Tests and Coverage

For framework-specific commands (xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, Maven/Gradle, pytest/unittest), thresholds, and HTML reports, see the references/ files:

  • references/coverage-dotnet.md
  • references/coverage-java.md
  • references/coverage-python.md

Use the auxiliary dispatcher to auto-detect the stack and run coverage:

bash references/run-coverage.sh
.NET
dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" --results-directory ./TestResults
Java
mvn test
# or
./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
Python
pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=xml
Stabilization Rules
  • Fix existing failures before creating new tests.
  • Remove or skip problematic infrastructure tests (e.g. JWT, external APIs) only when they require deep refactoring, and document the reason.
  • New tests follow BDD style: Given / When / Then (or Dado / Quando / Então for pt-BR projects).
Coverage Goals
LanguageMinimum target
.NET90% line and branch
Java85% line and branch
Python90% line and branch

Generate reports with reportgenerator (.NET), JaCoCo (Java), or pytest-coverage (Python).


Phase 5 — Documentation and Delivery

README.md

Update with:

  • Repository structure (hierarchical tree with descriptions).
  • Test coverage table: Total Tests, % Lines, % Branches.
  • Technical stack list.
  • Business Vision and Technical Vision sections.
CHANGELOG.md
Finalization

Use Conventional Commits:

  • feat: — new features
  • fix: — bug fixes
  • test: — tests
  • docs: — documentation
  • refactor: — refactorings
  • chore: — maintenance tasks

Restriction: Do not open the Pull Request automatically. Prepare the commit, update the README/CHANGELOG, and generate a Detailed Technical Summary containing all changes so the user can open the PR manually.


Quality Checklist

  • No high/critical security vulnerabilities remain.
  • Static-analysis warnings reduced to acceptable baseline.
  • All existing tests pass.
  • Coverage report generated and meets the language target.
  • README updated with coverage and architecture sections.
  • CHANGELOG updated with Unreleased changes.
  • Commit message follows Conventional Commits.

Common Mistakes

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid
throw ex; instead of raise/throwStack trace lost, root cause hiddenRe-raise with original trace; add context, do not reset
String concatenation in logsAllocation/SQLi-style risk, no structured paramsUse parameterized logging placeholders
Auto-opening the PRUser loses control of merge timingGenerate the summary; let the user open the PR
New tests before fixing red suiteUnstable baseline, false confidenceStabilize existing failures first
Skip coverage reportNo evidence target was metAlways emit cobertura/jacoco/xml coverage

References

  • references/coverage-dotnet.md — .NET coverage (xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, Coverlet, reportgenerator, thresholds).
  • references/coverage-java.md — Java coverage (Maven JaCoCo, Gradle JaCoCo, thresholds).
  • references/coverage-python.md — Python coverage (pytest-cov, unittest + coverage.py, mypy, thresholds).
  • references/run-coverage.sh — Stack-detecting dispatcher that runs the right coverage command.

See Also

  • For reviewing a single change before merge, see code-review-and-quality.
  • For automated SonarQube issue remediation across stacks, see sonarqube-autofix.

Origin

Adapted from the devin/playbooks/multi-language-quality/PLAYBOOK.md playbook into an agentskills.io-format skill, following the catalog standards (license: MIT, metadata.version, tripartite description with explicit Do NOT use for clause).

Comments

Markdown supported